Nuclear Energy Economy

>>7977242
Nuclear power is dead.

File: dark_mark.jpg (33KB, 1057x611px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1057x611px

>>7977250
N...no

>>7977250
i disagree.

Its actually expanding in usage globally and in the US.

>Nuclear power capacity worldwide is increasing steadily, with over 60 reactors under construction in 15 countries.

http://world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/plans-for-new-reactors-worldwide.aspx


Its has a great EROEI and is CO2 emission free

>>7977257
>CO2 emission free
This AGW cult needs to go away, there is radioactive waste piling up that will be around for 40K years in which time we will probably have incurred a couple more ice ages. In the meantime we fire it out the barrels of guns. Fucking monkeys.

>>7977264
You don't knoe jack shit about nuclear energy. Seriously, stop talking.

>>7977264
Thats pretty ignorant.

AGW is scientific fact.

Its your "radiation is always bad" boogeyman that is complete applesauce.

File: nuclear-energy-poll.gif (19KB, 546x354px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 546x354px

>>7977257

The jig is up

>>7977270
>half-sample

nice try.

most people are also idiots and are uneducated about radiological risks

>>7977275
most pronuclear fags are uneducated too and only support it because they think it makes look smarter/science-y

>>7977286
i believe your thinking about pop-sci retards supporting solar highways and ethanol subsidies.

>>7977286
Most people who support nuclear are proper engineers and scientists.

>>7977242
Ça ne marche pas, promis juré craché, si je mens je vais en Angleterre.

>>7977334
Vous dites bonjour à la Reine

It works well.

File: 16.jpg (72KB, 764x429px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 764x429px

>>7977242
electrolysis is very inefficient, but hydrogen production at night when solid fueled reactors can't ramp down makes sense


The world should be building late generation II PWR reactors as fast as we can, Westinghouse 4-loop, CANDU-6, CPR-1000, VVER-xxx, all work amazingly well and have an incredible track record with many reactor-centuries of heritage

EPR is a waste of money, jury is out on AP-1000, depends how cheap the Chinese can do it, APR-1400 is amazing so far, very cheap for gen III, high power, could be very promising for export

ESBWR could be very cool if it ever gets built, although ABWR has had a really rough start

>>7977384
thanks for the feeedback.

>PWR
looks like the way to go for now.

Centrifugal enrichment has been a boon for better EROEI.

>>7977250
>>7977264
>>7977270
>>7977286
Why is there always this one guy posting the same exact posts in every nuclear thread? Hint: It's because he makes the threads.

File: seven_unique_posters.png (872B, 90x30px) Image search: [Google]

872B, 90x30px

>>7977435
bretty sure the samefagging was obvious no offense anon-kun

I mean...pic related

File: 6546546546546.png (30KB, 748x393px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 748x393px

>>7977435
>>7977461
OP here

I and "nuclear power is dead" guy are 2 different posters

>>7977242
France

>>7977264
>be around for 40K years
Er, 40 million years.