How bad is being happy for you?

> Brain activity is bad for you.
You should stop all your brain activity, it's bad for you :^)

>>7973775

Well, thinking itself also promotes the growth of high-grade gliomas.

http://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2015/04/brain-tumor-growth-stimulated-by-nerve-activity-in-the-cortex.html

This might also explain why men are at slightly greater risk for these kinds of cancers than women.

>>7973803
> A research says nerve activity in the cortex grows ALREADY EXISTING tumors.
oh wow, if I ever get a tumor I should stop using my head so it can grow more comfortably.
Also how does that relate to your argument ? You need to stop every kind of activity in the cortex, not just happiness. So you need to turn yourself into a vegetable so that a tumor doesn't turn you into a vegetable.

I got brain tumor from this thread

>>7973811
that wasnt me, im not talking about tumors, im talking about addict behaveyour.

>>7973901
Was that misspell intentional....

>>7973901
How did you jump from happiness to addictive behaviour ? Incase you're talking about addictive substances than yeah, don't do cocaine.

>>7973938
you can see from the scans

>>7973913
no, i hit the wrong key

>>7973974
an addiction implies tolerance and withdrawal though. are those always occurring regardless of the user?

>>7973974
so are you saying that because they both show responses in the same region of the brain they both are equivalent. now i dont know much about the brain or the effects of chemicals on the body, but i would think that there is more to addiction than just the region of the brain which the chemical stimulates. by that i am just appealing to the fact that just because two things look similar in one aspect doesn't mean that they are necessarily the same. (not the guy your were replying to btw)

File: benis.png (452KB, 1315x914px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 1315x914px

>>7973771

benis :D