From an evolutionary point of view, why do I want to hug this

>>7948201
Because you associate large facial features and soft textures with human babies, which is it evolutionary advantageous to care for.

Or something.

File: the-big-brown-bear-21561413.jpg (24KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x300px

>>7948249

>>7948201
>>7948249

This, kind of.
It's an example of coevolution to make you food for the bear.

>>7948261
humans are not viable food for bears

File: stefanmolyneux bear.jpg (89KB, 634x428px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 634x428px

You say that because you're looking at a picture of it.
Trust me, the intimidation factor is real, when you actually see one up close.

This is what they look like without the fluff.

>>7948201
Social conditioning, you've grown up with soft cuddly things (dogs, rabbits, cats, fuck even Winne the Pooh). So now you're a grown adult you still feel those same childhood "instincts" to run up and hug the shit out of it.

>>7948249
Also some of this, probably.

>>7948257
I want to hug the shit out of that bear.
>tfw it would just maul me to death.

File: image.png (74KB, 412x351px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 412x351px

BEARPOSTERS vs GORILLAPOSTERS

>>7948249

That is fucking popsych rubbish

>>7949533

It will give birth to bearilla posters when someone can be bothered to use photoshop

>>7949517
Wow, that really is a bear.

>>7949533
Dumb frogposter.

File: StefanMolyneux.jpg (8KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 480x360px

>>7949517
> stefanmolyneux bear
Not an argument.

>>7948201
>prehistoric OP sees bear
>"awww how cute!"
>prehistoric OP tries to pet bear
>bear tears OP's head off
>he dies
>his shit genes are removed from the gene pool
And that, my friend, is where the evolutionary advantage lies.

File: annoyedbear.jpg (19KB, 400x318px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 400x318px

>>7949565