Why does everyone hate De Broglie–Bohm? It's certainly

>>7853612
Bohmian mechanics is the only consistent interpretation. Down side is that it doesn't generalize to relativistic quantum mechanics (yet).

>>7853612
>MWI mysticism

Thank you. /sci/ is sadly full of people who think that shits factual. They might as well just be saying "its magic!"

>>7853665
Can confirm QM isn't magic.

>>7853630
>Bohmian mechanics is the only consistent interpretation.
Yet, it isn't accepted by a consensus of scientists.

>>7853665
> /sci/ is sadly full of people who think that shits factual
Iirc over 50% of physicsts believe MWI is the correct interpretation of QM.
Perhaps that would explain why other people, on here for example, believe in it.

>>7853752
>>Iirc over 50% of physicsts believe MWI is the correct interpretation of QM.
nah

http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.1069

>>7853678
That's not what I said

File: 10955307_906753189372643_2575829907386200650_n.jpg (41KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 960x960px

>>7853612
Eh, please check your facts.
Bell experiment proves that hidden variables theory is wrong.
Pic is relevant, HVT is not on it, Copenhagen and MWI are.

>>7854037
Many worlds might as well just be called "its magic!" the theory.

World splitting is a ridiculous and ill defined concept.

>>7854052
Its a hypothesis and nobody debunked it so far so its accepted. Do it yourself and youll be worldly acclaimed scientist.

>>7854058
Rather a world acclaimed philospher.

That said, I also find MWT rather cringy.
Didn't even know about De Broglie's interpretation but from what I skimmed it sounds rather interesting. Expected some hipster shit first, though the name should have made me think otherwise in the first place.

I like his Böhm-Jacopini theorem. It helped a lot creating my own language.

>>7854085
please elaborate

>>7854037
only local hidden variables