Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
str8 4ward
CSE (Cavity Structure Effect) 2016-02-08 11:40:06 Post No. 7842841
[Report] Image search: [Google]
CSE (Cavity Structure Effect) 2016-02-08 11:40:06 Post No. 7842841
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: maxresdefault.jpg (60KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
60KB, 1280x720px
Real of Fake?
>>
> the only "evidence" is a shitty b&w photo
> no physical explaination
200% FAKE
>>
>>7842854
http://www.keelynet.com/greb/greb.htm
here's an attempt of physical (not mathematical!) explaination
>>
>>7842854
also this guy did some videos on it
https://www.youtube.com/user/911stuff/videos
I'm not implying im convinced tho, just baffled
>>
>>7842854
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duaxmhD7vG4
>>
>>7842841
I do believe the LHC are doing particle experiments using chitin late in 2016 (I will search for the link)
>>
>>7842873
> UFOs use this technology
> You can see the curve shape in UFO videos
Are you le serious ?
>>
File: emdrive_2.jpg (55KB, 600x381px) Image search:
[Google]
55KB, 600x381px
>cavity resonance frequency
Isn't this how the meme drive operates that NASA recently discovered and still can't figure out? What if he managed to find a very tiny version that uses ambient energy instead of powerful microwaves. Eveny with tiny thrust if enough are stacked onto each other you could fly. Attributing this as UFO technology or warping space/time could just be him not understanding what he's looking at. I believe he's an entomologist, not a physicist after all.
On the other hand....
>Hey look at me! I invented anti-gravity!
>Here's proof, some photos and all my work showing how I did it.
>I had to censure the part of my work showing how I did it so other people don't do it too
Classic set up for a scam. All that's missing is the bit where he asks for money.
>>
>>7843035
The thing that NASA discovered was a ridiculously small amount of energy output that wasn't even bigger than the margin of error.
>>
>>7842859
>here's an attempt of physical (not mathematical!) explaination
>physical
>not mathematical
Not going to read.
>>
>>7842841
you are asking if an antigravity machine powered by dead bees is real?
>>
>>7843190
> DUDE UFO TECHNOLOGY LMAO
ok
>>
>>7843192
how much did you watch? 2 seconds?
>>
>>7843195
No, he's talking about the batshit ufo stuff at the end of the video. Which was just as nonsensical as the rest of the video.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80Bk39UT4e0
>>
>>7843038
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57q3_aRiUXs
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2