Thread replies: 4
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Hi /sci/
I'm not trying to make a boastful thread (you all will put me to shame anyway) but I saw this site (pic related) that correlates various tests with levels of intelligence. I've only the ACT once and I got a 32 first try without studying (yes, not hard, whatever). I'm kind of a savant with geography and I'd love to do something related to that. I'm transferring schools next year (I'm 18) to pursue geography. Is this a good idea? I realize GIS is the hot topic nowadays and I'd likely get into it more (I already have QGIS installed, learning how to work it).
I can memorize geographic knowledge fairly easily and have been drawing maps ever since I saw them. What is my skillset /sci/? What am I good for?
no bully pls, I'm seriously in a crisis. I also have the potential to be a professional athlete, but that's not necessarily sustainable... I also value academia very highly, as well as music. I love to write fiction.
I'd like /sci/'s unbiased and raw insight.
>>
What do you mean by pursuing geography? As a civ. engineer? As an analyst?
>>
I hope you're trolling kid
let this thread be proof that intelligence is completely wasted on those people without the will to be a creator in the desert that is life.
>what is my skillset
hahahahahahahahah
>>
Assuming you don't mind travel, I would recommend geology. It deals with geography and then masses more on top of it. Whether you are analysing core samples or taking on the detective-like field work to ascertain historical geological activity, you will be dealing with an awful lot of geography. So I would recommend that.
Thread posts: 4
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1