A statistical analysis of footprint data has found that Foot

>>7721739
k

Where are the corpses.

Where are the recent fossils.

I will grant you that a relict population is not impossible, but I still think it's exceptionally unlikely.

>>7721744
>corpses
10.000 black bears die every year in the woods
I'm out there almost all the time but I have never seen a single black bear bone

>>7721748
Millions of people live in the areas claimed to be inhabited by Sasquatch, and have done so for hundreds of years,and there is no body.

It just seems awful improbable anon.

>>7721757
They said the same about wolverines. Don't worry you'll get your body soon enough.

>>7721744
Perhaps they bury their dead. I've never seen a human corpse and I live in a city of a few million.

File: 1450012020308.jpg (13KB, 230x230px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 230x230px

>>7721759
Those are some flaming hot implications, friend

>>7721739
The existence of New World primates would suggest this is easily possible.

>>7721758
Yeah but that was when no one had a recording device glued to their hand.

You think in this day and age a sasquatch could hide from humans?

>>7721757
I lived in an area inhabited by bears and wolves but never saw either, only occasional tracks, nor did anyone I know. If a wild animal actively avoids humans it takes a lot of trickery to even get a glimpse of one

there's enough sightings of sasquatch that I'd entertain the possibility of its existence though I have no idea why it'd be suppressed(if it exists, it's being kept secret, this much is obvious).

File: Patterson Gimlin..webm (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

looks pretty real to me