Black holes aren't real. Prove me wrong.

>>7698205

Your mom.

>>7698205

That's not how this works. You made a claim, thus it's up to you to provide evidence to back it up.

> B-but it's impossible to prove a negative!

True, that's why you shouldn't have phrased it such a retarded fashion.

>>7699414
If you try to claim they're wrong, you yourself have made a claim that must be backed, though.

>>7698205
No. Go fuck yourself and read a book about black holes.

Then what lies at the center of a galaxy?

>>7699420
>Go fuck yourself
Anon is going to go masturbate while thinking about you now.

How does this make you feel? To know that you did this?

We're inside a black hole right

Prove me wrong

>>7699427
ebin

>>7698205

>go to your mom
>spread her legs wide open
>stare into the abyss

There is your proof

>>7698205
Two groups—in Germany and the U.S.—monitored the orbits of individual stars very near to the black hole and used Kepler's laws to infer the enclosed mass. The German group found a mass of 4.31 ± 0.38 million solar masses,[2] whereas the American group found 4.1 ± 0.6 million solar masses.[3] Given that this mass is confined inside a 44 million km diameter sphere, this yields a density ten times higher than previous estimates.

Astronomers are confident that these observations of Sagittarius A* provide good empirical evidence that the Milky Way has a supermassive black hole at its center, 26,000 light-years from the Solar System[8] because:

The star S2 follows an elliptical orbit with a period of 15.2 years and a pericenter (closest distance) of 17 light hours (1.8×1013 m) from the center of the central object.[23]
From the motion of star S2, the object's mass can be estimated as 4.1 million solar masses.[3] (The corresponding Schwarzschild radius is 0.08 AU/12 million km/7.4 million miles; 17 times bigger than the radius of the Sun.)
The radius of the central object must be significantly less than 17 light-hours, because otherwise, S2 would collide with it. In fact, recent observations of the star S14 (S0-16)[24] indicate that the radius is no more than 6.25 light-hours (6.75 billion km/4.2 billion miles/45 AU), which would be far beyond Neptune's orbit, leading to a density limit 8.55×1036 kg / 1.288×1039 m3 = 6.64×10−3 kg/m3.

>>7699416
Way to be a halfwit. You don't understand simple fallacies, what are you doing on /sci/?
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof

File: 1438092110340.jpg (42KB, 475x479px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 475x479px

>>7699416
>provides no proof to backup claim
>Claims are rejected - lack proof
>Instead of providing proof, he shifts the burden onto the other arguer to prove his baseless claim wrong

Top quality fallacy m80

>>7698205
>trial murder case
>"Prove I am a murderer!"
>"nah, prove you are not a murderer!"

Cant we just explore and discover and advance? Why is there always arguing?

>>7698205
fuck you we can observe their effect on nearby systems and it is consistent with our model of black hole

>>7700039
>>7700083
I do understand the fallacy, I'm telling you why you don't.

>>7699414
>> B-but it's impossible to prove a negative!
That meme needs to die anyway, of course some negative statements can be proved.

>>7700039
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque

fuck off, retard

File: pepedemontesqieu.jpg (59KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 480x360px

>>7698205

black holes *are ill defined

>>7698205
if they don't exist, then who was phone? checkmate athiests

>>7699421
God

>>7702009
that would be tight if it were true.

>>7701633

You made a claim, back it up.

>>7699416

Are you seriously retarded enough to believe that I'M the one who needs to back up a claim? I'm not saying he's wrong, I'm saying he needs to bring evidence!

Thank god you exist, otherwise the helmet industry would collapse.

>>7702615
>I'm not saying he's wrong, I'm saying he needs to bring evidence!
Then you aren't generating an issue, now are ya? Not doing what I said you shouldn't do, now are ya?

Learn to not just read, but understand, you stupid shitfaced cocksucker.

>>7698205

prove yourself right. otherwise fuck off.

>>7702579
your mom was tight last night

>>7699519

So the density is less 7 grams per cubic meter and this means it must be a black hole?
I'm denser than that.

>>7703295
>I'm denser than that.
Indeed you are. The densest of the dense.

File: 20151128_204625-1.jpg (3MB, 2587x1932px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2587x1932px

>>7703364
This is an example of what we knew about black holes 40 years ago and nothing has been disproved since.

E=mc square? ? verses Black hole. .Do they support eachother or wipe eachother out??

>>7698205
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.

OP none of us have an available budget to do as you request. Go ask /biz/ for funding and come back when you have enough for a space telescope.