<neat>

Extrapolate wtf that meant.

>>7662604

I can't really think of anything clever to say in response to this but I'd still like to submit this post so it can be immortalized in the archives

>>7662604

>Disclaimer: The above statement has not been evaluated by anyone with a high school diploma. The concept is not intended to describe, model, detail, or explain any observable phenomenon.

Someone did math poorly, and then said, hey, instead of me just sucking hard at math; maybe reality is actually impossible!

Which would be more interesting, but sadly, no, that guy really does just suck hard at math.

>>7662604
>mathematically impossible
What is that even supposed to mean.

And either way, it's wrong. Raindrops and raindrop formation can be described mathematically.

>>7662825
Yea this is like the old "bees can't fly" thing.

People use to say that because according to conventional models their wings shouldn't have been able to generate enough lift to actually get their body airborne.

This doesn't mean its "impossible" though or science/math can't explain it, its just unusual. Bees don't flap their wings straight up and down they do a kind of rotation and this helps them generate the lift they need.

Bees are unusual, water is unusual, its not impossible though and it can be modeled mathematically.

>>7662604
Pure water raindrops are impossible. Raindrops that condensed around dust particles are what we see.

>>7662604
Is this the new version of the "bee flight is aerodynamically impossible" thing? Because that is my least favorite maymay.

>>7663832
this
come on /sci step up your fucking game 70% of this thread is from highschool it's fucking pathetic.

If you retards actually watched the video at minute earth you would know they don't mean literally impossible.

That's why raindrops form around particulates in the air, not spontaneously.

>>7663849
Well if OP had linked the fucking video I would have watched it.

>>7662613
I smiled

>>7662613
It's a video from a youtube channel called MinuteEarth.
It's a click bait title to grab the viewers attention, the creator is actually quite intelligent. I haven't watched it in a while but he says something along the lines of it being extremely improbable for a single raindrop to form, unless there is an activation site

>>7663829
it's*

File: RaindropShape.png (33KB, 685x656px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 685x656px

>>7662604
>mathematically impossible
Mathematics offers no concept of physical reality and erroneous concepts can still be mathematically consistent. That's why we have experiment-based science.

>>7663832
>Pure water raindrops are impossible
They are impossible because we have so many aerosols in our atmosphere. But theoretically, if we hadn't, then pure water raindrops would still be possible.