really

>>5601927
Only once you squish their figs off

>>5601927
In mathematics, a real number is a value that represents a quantity along a line. The adjective real in this context was introduced in the 17th century by René Descartes, who distinguished between real and imaginary roots of polynomials.
The real numbers include all the rational numbers, such as the integer −5 and the fraction 4/3, and all the irrational numbers, such as √2 (1.41421356…, the square root of 2, an irrational algebraic number). Included within the irrationals are the transcendental numbers, such as π (3.14159265…). Real numbers can be thought of as points on an infinitely long line called the number line or real line, where the points corresponding to integers are equally spaced. Any real number can be determined by a possibly infinite decimal representation, such as that of 8.632, where each consecutive digit is measured in units one tenth the size of the previous one. The real line can be thought of as a part of the complex plane, and complex numbers include real numbers.

>>5602791
I know.
One can show that a nonconstant holomorphic map f for two riemannian manifolds X and Y locally implies a map equal to z in its kth power. As a corollary you get then that f is an open map and if X is compact then Y is compact too and f is surjective. If P is now a complex polynomial then it can be extended through P(infinity) = infinity to the field of meromorphic maps which can be shown to equal the holomorphic maps between the riemanian number sphere without infinity. Because of the stuff above P is surjective since the sphere is compact and thus P(infinity) = infinity which is not zero. Therefore 0 lies in the polynomials over the complex plane and as such polynomials with complex coefficients have always a complex root. This is the fundamental theorem of algebra.

>>5601927
dumb animeposter