anime is faget

>>5502969
truuuuuuu

yes because lift is still generated under the wings next question

ferociously

>>5502969
The answer is actually yes and the reasons behind it are quite interesting

>>5502971
wrong the plane is not mobing relativ 2 the air so there is no lift

>>5502969
would a plane take off if it were on near frictionless water???

same thing

File: Air_dry_dynamic_visocity_on_pressure_temperature.png (28KB, 518x382px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 518x382px

>>5502989
wronmg te air is moved by the conveyor belt just use the drag equation you imbecile of course the velocity of the air at the hieght of the wings will be lower than at the surface so a higher v for the 747 would be required which depends on the distance to the conveyor belt and the viscosity of the air which depends of temperatire anyways ok next question kiddo

File: 1469548760714.jpg (6KB, 200x251px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 200x251px

>>5503000
TRIPLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>5503000
not if the water was flowing backwards to the plane

>>5503026
yeah but its near frictionless so any reverse force the water exerts is negligable

File: 1485832567350.jpg (6KB, 228x200px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 228x200px

>>5503026

can boats accelerate against a river current? of course. a sea plane's prop is just like the boat's that moffukin plane is taking off no probs

>>5502969
The funny think is this won't even prevent the plane from movinf forward, it's like saying "if you push somone on a tread mill forward at the same speed as the treadmill, they won't fall down because their legs are on the ground"

>>5503004
ur dreamin m8

>>5503344
>>5503044
good doubles

>>5503000
great trips