le crossdressing c programmer

ok

>>5407412
more like stinkpad

>>5407412
its funny because all the trans people in tech dont know anything about hw and memory mgmt.

>>5407902
lol thats because there a bunch of winy baby's that wear girl clothes

>>5407902
hime isn't a tranny

>>5407412
Stupid retarded C programmers I hate them.

For the next 10 minutes I will be posting as many nudes as 4chan allows

>>5407973
That's exactly one because more would be a porn dump.

(also one might still be a porn dump if the DUMBASS MODS say so)

Can you guys fuck off back to /lgbt/?
Thanks.

>>5407973
Looks like time is up. Glad I got to post as much porn as physically possible.
Goodbye forever I'm going to commit suicide again
░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▒▒▒▒▀▄▀▀▀▄░░░░░▒▌▒▀▐
░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▒▄██▒▄▀▌▒▒▒▄▀▀▐▀▄▌
░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐█▀▄▀▒░▐▒▄▀░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░░░▌▄▀▒▒▒░░▌▒▒░░░░░█
░░░░░░░░░░▄▀▀▒▐▒▒▒▌▌░███▄▄░░░▒▌
░░░░░░░▄▀▀▒▒▒▄▀▒▌▐▐▒▌▒▒▒▒▀▀█▄▒▐
░░░░░░█▒▒▒▒░▐▐▐▐▒▌▐▄▀▀██▄▒▒▒▒▀█▄
░░░░▄▀▐▒▒▒░▒▒▌▌▐▐▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▀█▄▒▒▒▒█
░░░█▄█▌▌▒░░▌▒▐▐▐▐▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀█▄▒▒▒█
░░██▀▒▒▐▒░░▌▒▌▀▄▀▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀█▄▒▒▌
░▐█▒▒▒▒▒▀▄░▐▒▌▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▀█▒▐
░█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▄░▀▐▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▒▒▀█▄▌
░▌▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▄▄▀▄▒█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▄▀▒▒▒▒██
░▌▒▒▒▒▒▀▀▒▒▒▒▐▒▀▄▒▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▄▀▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▌
░▐▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▄▀▀░▀▄▄▄▄▀▀▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█
░░█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█░░░▀▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▐
░░░█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█░░░░█░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▌
░░░░█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█░░░░█░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▐

>>5407983
Steven Pinker

File: 1494958715727.jpg (97KB, 950x960px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 950x960px

>>5407982
>>5407910
RUDE

>>5407982
You've never visited /lgbt/

It's a blue board, and it's basically a gayer version of /r9k/

>>5408091
that can't be
/r9k/ loves traps and /lgbt/ is almost entirely on the fence trannies who HATE HATE HATE crossdressers because crossdressers do it for sexual fun and not because they're sick in the head.

>>5408097
>/r9k/ loves traps and /lgbt/ is almost entirely on the fence trannies
You think maybe they could get together some day.

They could call it trapcon.

where da gurlcawk n00dz @

Your fortune: （　´_ゝ`）ﾌｰﾝ

File: 1446098746183.jpg (126KB, 331x510px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 331x510px

GIMME THE BEAT BOYS


AND FREE MY SOUL

>>5408118
is that the elusive programmer (male)?

>>5407983
ur butt is stinky

At night, the people come and go
They talk too fast, and walk too slow
Chasing time from hour to hour
I pour the drinks and crush the flowers
What have I, what have I done to deserve this?

long story short one time I was on a vacation at the beach with me fam'ly, and my brother had invited his friend to come, so there was the 5 of us... and we were all in our late teens like 16/17 something like that, keep that in mind because later you'll be like how old was he? but anywho we went to one of the local pizza places on the boardwalk to get some food and me brother was feelin' a bit rough in his tummy and we all decided it would be funny to go to the amusement park area and ride the haunted house ride like as a laugh so we're all waiting in line and my brother's like ugh man i think i have to shit and we're like man just wait this line will move quick we'll ride the ride whatever and he was like ughh and then we're standing around and i look at his face and he suddenly makes the "i just shit my pants" face like it's unmistakeable that's the only face that it could be and i busted out laughing and was like dude are you serious and he was like man i gotta and then i was like guys ____ was so scared to go on this haunted house ride he pooped his pants and my parents were laughing at him a little and i can't imagine how horrible he must have felt but it was extremely funny and i literally still joke about it with that friend of his who was there to witness it it was a classic hilarious time

>>5407983
you're such a tease

>>5408537
no that's a girl

>>5408567
The whole time reading this I was waiting for some hot sex but you know.

>>5409617
lies!

>>5407412
>why are you casting the return value of malloc()?
Why not?

DUKE IT OUT IN DC.

>>5410614
Because void * is directly assignable safely to any pointer type, and if you cast, you're hardcoding the type of the object in one more place. Idiomatic C is to write something like

struct foo bar = 0;
...
bar = malloc(sizeof *bar);

Then, if you later decide that bar should really be a struct baz, you only need to change in the declaration, instead of hunting down all the places where memory is initialized.

>>5410635
struct foo bar = 0;

is invalid C. You probably mean

struct foo *bar = (void*)0;

>>5410635
If I decide it should be baz, do I only need to change

struct foo bar = 0;

to

struct baz bar = 0;

?

Do I free the memory in either case simply by writing

free(bar);

?

>>5410658
This is still no valid C. You cannot implicitly convert an int to a struct and you cannot free non-pointer variables.

>>5410654
Sure, I mean

struct foo *bar = 0;

There's no need to cast the 0, since assigning 0 to a pointer is guaranteed to set it to a null pointer constant.

>>5410680
Yes, that's true, but you should note that sizeof(0) may be != sizeof((void*)0)

>>5410701
Certainly, but that won't affect the code at all.

sizeof *bar

will correctly evaluate to the size of a struct foo, not the size of an int, or a char, or a (void *).

>>5410666 (trips)
>>5410680

Is this valid C?

unsigned int length = 1;
struct foo *bar = 0; /* struct baz *bar = 0; */
bar = malloc(length * sizeof *bar);
/* do whatever with bar here... */
free(bar);

>>5410701
Yes, 0 is an integer literal, while (void*)0 is a null pointer constant literal, they behave very different.

>>5410725
I don't immediately see any reason why not.

>>5410701
Also, it's considered poor form to put parentheses around the thing you're sizeof-ing. That's only necessary when taking the size of a type, like "sizeof (int)". For other uses, putting in parentheses is like writing "return(4)", and is sort of confusing.

>>5410726
According to section 6.3.2.3 of the C99 standard,

>An integer constant expression with the value 0, or such an expression cast to type
>void *, is called a null pointer constant. If a null pointer constant is converted to a
>pointer type, the resulting pointer, called a null pointer, is guaranteed to compare unequal
>to a pointer to any object or function.

So both are null pointer constants, actually.

File: NEW MEME.png (9KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 420x420px

>>5407412

>>5410725
This is valid, provided that struct foo is declared.

>>5407900
>>5408555
unchecked