""

File: 20170424_150412.png (26KB, 531x425px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 531x425px

>>5355072
!?

File: pepyuh.png (192KB, 711x633px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 711x633px

>>5355075

File: 852.png (107KB, 680x448px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 680x448px

>>5355095

File: pephug.png (85KB, 606x505px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 606x505px

>>5355104
hu
g

File: 8f4.jpg (93KB, 1387x702px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1387x702px

>>5355108

File: 1489910833172.png (37KB, 1127x685px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 1127x685px

>>5355108

File: 1471005907570.jpg (39KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 657x527px

I'll call it in pone

File: ab7.jpg (20KB, 680x179px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 680x179px

>>5355122

File: cowboypep.jpg (41KB, 585x501px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 585x501px

les play cow boy

File: 618.png (39KB, 839x657px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 839x657px

>>5355144
nu i wan tu pley hary pooter

File: peppp.jpg (58KB, 463x325px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 463x325px

>>5355147
Certainly not, Harry Potter is not good material for young frogs like you, Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series' only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it's certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: pep cort.jpg (349KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 1600x1064px

ordrer in t he cort

File: 1fe.png (59KB, 658x662px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 658x662px

>>5355155

File: pep dargon.png (349KB, 1616x1220px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 1616x1220px

>>5355147
ockey u b heiry en i b dargron

File: 1487050348948.png (20KB, 641x524px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 641x524px

hail
hitlre

File: pep hilter.jpg (12KB, 235x240px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 235x240px

>>5355211
oh hai howe u duoingn

File: 6A0D8E1B-1784-4CC0-9A4D-6F48DCCDC92B-51920-00003AA7E6199230.png (15KB, 240x304px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 240x304px

love uuu

why does he have that step shape indent in his eyeballs?

File: IMG_20170426_220224.jpg (147KB, 600x486px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 600x486px

>>5355501
Κεkε