/qa/ on the left
[s4s] on the right
>>5211321
Why isn't /qa/ having an aneurysm over the existence of pol like in real life?
>>5211323
We're fighting for a nicer 4chan.
>>5211323
because they don't care about it
glad to help!
CUTE!
absolutely accurate, we're making nice shit great for the first time
>>5211323
why do you pretend that /qa/ has an aneurysm over the existence of pol in real life?
>>5211442
Also remember that not too long ago they were rallying for the deletion of s4s
>>5211459
that's not really a lot dudester
those were mostly from one dudarooni
>>5211473
>>5211491
760/1138560 = 6,675 E-4% which is like 0,0006675%
keep in mind that those threads die with no replies, or they're spambotted to hell
http://desuarchive.org/qa/search/text/delete%20%2Fpol%2F/type/op/
>>5211491
also next time please don't make assumptions about a board you don't browse because that was very rude and this is a nice board so rudeness is forbidden ok bud?
>>5211526
>1,000,000 posts
>77,000 are about pol
7.7% of ALL posts are users having an aneurysm over pol
I'm gonna marry these cuties!
>>5211562
>Every 13 posts on qa someone whinges about pol
>>5211566
>>5211593
That's just false dude
first of all
You assumed that everybody that says something about /pol/ is whining about /pol/ which is completely wrong!
Some of them come from the /pol/ users, some of them come from bait threads. Look at the spammed threads, the spammer wants to disguise his posts as /pol/ posts so that they don't get deleted and so that he can sagebomb succesfully all of them.
Pic related, it's 1% of the posts, do you think that 1% of qa has an aneurysm about [s4s]? Do you think that every 91 posts someone whines about [s4s]?
If you search for /tv/ in the archive you get 15000 which is 1.5% of the total posts, do you think that 1.5% of the board has an aneurysm about /tv/? Do you think that every 50 posts someone whines about /tv/?
I feel like you dislike us for whatever reason it might be while you probably never lurked our board, and you're trying to further your negativity, which is pretty sad because we're a nice board. Those implications you're throwing at us are pretty insulting.
>>5211665
>People talk about pol on qa significantly higher than any other board
Thanks for proving my point
>>5211687
Who are you quoting?
Please consult all the points before posting!
Pretty much nobody talks about /pol/ right now. There are 5 /pol/ threads in the catalog right now, they're all made by /pol/ themselves and they're all dying with no replies.
You should look at the board catalog before opining on the board itself, because talking about stuff you have no idea about makes you look pretty stupid.
Now, please tell me why are you furthering your negativity, do you do it to "win" or you have some other reason, please tell me about it.
>>5211720
topkeke
>There are five threads all about pol on qa at this very moment
>>5211725
Wow you've done it again, you didn't even read my whole post!
Why are you trying to frame us as some kind of a /pol/ whining board?
>>5211731
>us... a /pol/ whining board
There we have it folks, he admitted that qa is nothing more than a pol whining board
straight from the horse's lips
>>5211742
That's not what I said at all, please consult all the points before posting!
>>5211746
>That's... what I said, please...post
Such unabashed admission of malevolence
>>5211759
"I am a homo that likes to twist other people words and suck cocks"- You
Wow I didn't think about your sexuality, sorry namefriend
>>5211766
>I am a homo that likes to... suck cocks
Too much information dude
I'm out of warped perspective anime pics now
>>5211780
Ok then but now, in all seriousness, all complete seriousness, as in no more memes or witty comebacks, why?
>>5211795
I'm a busy girl. Put a pin into that thought and come back later.
>>5211801
lol you aren't a busy girl you're funposting on s4s right now, you have nothing else to do
>>5211808
That's where you're wrong kiddo; I've got dishes to wash
Smell ya later~