Why don't you want to throw marxists out of helicopters?

i do but i want to follow the law

File: 1479339320584.png (200KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 2000x1333px

>>5110419
Are followers of a dead ideology really the biggest concern your isolated life has?
1st world problems, where you are so high on the top you have to prop up corpses to feign opposition

>>5110435
>Are followers of a dead ideology really the biggest concern your isolated life has?
Yes, especially when they never shut up.

>>5110479
Whatever floats your boat

File: 1363636923487.jpg (38KB, 432x251px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 432x251px

>>5110419
WE KILLIN JEWS?

count me in!

>>5110419
throwing people from helicopters is not nice
btw snakes can't hear

>>5110860
comies are rudefigs tho

>>5110867
how?

y do 17 year olds who post trump and garbage think they're smart enough to engage political discourse lol it's funny cuz they say a whole lot of nothing, citing things that happened but never present a cohesive argument

you need to go back :P

>>5110876
I've been telling you time and time again, the problem is social media.

More specifically: The problem is using farmable generic point systems as motivators for content (such as karma, "shares", or "likes")

Social media is a huge business, too big to fail. They gamed the internet to mold it into a place where people feel locked down to a handful of sites because that's where their profiles and vanity points are, and where all the share buttons go.
and they did it because they WANT everyone to turn humor into that polished self-contained garbage you mentioned because when people consider that to be top of the lines humor it's easier for memetic advertising to take advantage of them.
They WANT the internet to be a cesspit of debate instead of genuine fun, because through debate everyone reveals exactly who they are and what they believe (and ad companies wet dream)

Big Data has successfully reduced internet users into batteries (for data). This is the real matrix and you're living in it.
You want to go back to the real internet, before it was unwittingly turned into a machine whose components are the new generation of internet users themselves? Too bad, we can't go back.

Just remember who the real enemy is, those generic point systems. It's the method through which they attempt to enslave you.

>>5110419
VIOLATION OF THE NAP!

>>5110872
taking other people's property isnt nice

>>5110908
not doing anything whilst making people work for your property giving them almost nothing in return is not nice

>>5110915
killing me because you want what i own without agreeing to my terms instead of just starting your own business isn't nice.

/pol/ is property of esfores and we dont negotiate with rude people

>>5110918
why kill?

>>5110922
because you used the commie strawman where i'm a factory/land owner and you're part of the "exploited prole"

>>5110925
i didn't call you a capitalist pig, and i didn't call for killing

File: 1471359405123.jpg (38KB, 403x403px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 403x403px

>>5110932
because you'd be wrong you commie shit

>>5110936
why did you answer a statement?

>>5110937
Because this is free AmericaN board he can post whaNte

File: nichijou4.png (73KB, 400x363px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 400x363px

>>5110941
of course
mfw i forgot

File: 1485852839918.png (24KB, 764x706px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 764x706px

>>5110876

Hi John Oliver.

>>5110915
>not doing anything whilst making people work for your property giving them almost nothing in return is not nice
This is what economic illiterates actually believe.
Surplus value is so fucking retarded I can't even believe you people still believe in it. STOP!

Why do socialists think they will gain anything from taking over the means of production?

Why are they stupid enough to think their personal material wealth will somehow increase when in reality it won't?

This is probably the biggest hole in socialist theories yet hardly anyone here talks about it.

>communist revolution
>take every last penny from capitalists
>divided up amongst everyone it works out to about $500 per person(yes that little)
>go to spend that money
>prices increase because no new consumer goods are produced in this situation
>workers are in the same exact situation they were the revolution but now the economy is completely destroyed

OR

>communist revolution
>every consumer good the capitalists own is split up and given to the workers
>it's such an extremely small amount of goods that not even 1% of workers will be able to get any of this

OR

>communist revolution
>money is abolished
>workers take over the means of production completely
>the same exact quantity of consumer goods that was being produced under capitalism are again produced
>the working class has to work JUST AS HARD and JUST AS LONG as they did under capitalism to produce the same amount of shit they were previously consuming
and this scenario is forgetting about the economic calculation problem and the fact economies like this never work.


Either way you go about this there's no getting "MUH SURPLUS VALUE" back. 99.5% of the consumer goods the working class was producing was already being consumed and owned by the working class, not the capitalists. The capitalists own only extremely small amounts of consumer goods(houses, cars boats, tvs, food, porn, medicine) compared to what the whole working class owns.

>>5110915
>not doing anything whilst making people work for your property giving them almost nothing in return is not nice
Also you know if they gave you the "full value" of your labour, you would be NO BETTER OFF.

It would simply cause inflation because the same amount of consumer goods exist. The working class is already consuming 99% of consumer goods. There's nothing else to "get back". Money does NOT equal resources and it definitely doesn't equal only consumer goods.

Please redpill yourself on economics before it's too late.

File: CewsQKK.png (194KB, 906x542px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 906x542px

KILL EM ALL

File: dam son.jpg (50KB, 640x634px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 640x634px

>>5111122
did you write all that by yourself? wew lad, too bad no one's going to read it on it's way to page 10