>He posts on /s4s/

>>5102082
Well, guess what? It's pretty much the exact opposite of everything in your post. Thought you really nailed it this time, didn't ya? But I guess you neglected to anticipate the fact that everything you've ever said is probably wrong. That doesn't surprise me very much. What is shocking is that you had the audacity to think anyone here would be interested in reading that meaningless drivel. What in God's name could possibly have been going through your mind when you typed that? Oh, that's right, nothing at all. Not a thought whatsoever about how your post would reflect on you as a person. Now you're stuck with it. Regardless of the fact that you posted anonymously, the stain of that post's abysmal quality will forever surround you with an aura of shame that can never be scrubbed off. You probably won't even notice, though, will you? That's the problem with your kind; you aren't even human. Just as long as you get your two cents in, all the scorn in the world won't deter you. But people will not tolerate this kind of thing for very long. The time is coming when these types of missteps will be met with swift retaliation and even those undeserving will be swept away with its forcefulness. I just wanted you to know that you have played a part in this unfortunate sequence of events, even if the guilt can't sting you now.

File: you.jpg (111KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1280x720px

>>5102129
Wow nice post nerd. Didn't read lol. SAVED.

>>5102082
The problem is, OP, that you probably aren't seeing all the posts. If you are just viewing [s4s] through the /s4s/ board, you don't see the green posts, the posts with letters in their ids, or anything numberless. Together, those make up about 40-70 percent of [s4s], depending on the day. So conversation will appear disjointed and spastic, because you won't be getting the full picture.

I actually just flipped over to the /s4s/ interface to make this post, and it's pretty funny how unintelligible [s4s] is like this.

File: Screenshot_2017-01-28-23-05-46-1.png (256KB, 582x627px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 582x627px

>>5102148
It was probs a copypasto fam

>>5102082
who are you quoten?