The Weekly Peek #81

File: postpeeker160_toppeek.png (60KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 256x256px

Peek.

Your fortune: Good Luck

File: 1467965832373.png (106KB, 696x602px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 696x602px

>>4599799
>>4599800
Good ish, good sequential dubs.

>>4599799
good paper i read it
good double i check it
bad fortune i look at it

https://clyp.it/aod3gksz

>>4599799
ah, peek, dubs

File: no_poke6.png (892KB, 1895x1666px) Image search: [Google]

892KB, 1895x1666px

poke #6

>>4599799
The Weekly Peek,
The Weekly Peek.
As much fun to Read as it is to
get dubs,even though it doesn't rhyme.

>>4600202
What happened to The Weekly Poke?

>>4600202
Nice 02s

Your fortune: Outlook good

>>4600800
they're just beautifool dubs times two.

About as beautiful as The Weekly Peek. Soon available on Audible, I think. Because someone's gotta read it to Swaglord.

>>4601132
LOL GOT EM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>4601132
BAZANGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>4601132
LE SHOTS FIRED!!!!!!!! LUL!!!!!!!!!!!!

File: 1468536660279.png (304KB, 509x556px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 509x556px

Hahaha hi guys

File: businessman-holding-open-briefcase-full-of-money-ACEBXB[1].jpg (121KB, 1300x956px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1300x956px

>>4599799
Hey post peeker, my good man, have a little gift from me. Man, it would be nice if your next paper were a tad more purple.

File: Untitled.jpg (4KB, 411x387px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 411x387px

>>4601204
whys there fugging a's all over your suit... ?

hmmmmmmmmmm................

peek

>>4599799
didnt read

File: 1452692420315.jpg (6KB, 208x148px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 208x148px

peek

File: temp.jpg (4KB, 460x405px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 460x405px

peek

File: hahahaha.gif (227KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 800x533px

peek

What banner you gonna do, [s4s]?

peek

>>4601669
The most vexing parse is a specific form of syntactic ambiguity resolution in the C++ programming language. The term was used by Scott Meyers in Effective STL (2001).[1] It is formally defined in section 8.2 of the C++ language standard.[2]

An example is:

class Timer {
public:
Timer();
};

class TimeKeeper {
public:
TimeKeeper(const Timer& t);

int get_time();
};

int main() {
TimeKeeper time_keeper(Timer());
return time_keeper.get_time();
}

The line

TimeKeeper time_keeper(Timer());

is seemingly ambiguous, since it could be interpreted either as

a variable definition for variable time_keeper of class TimeKeeper, initialized with an anonymous instance of class Timer or
a function declaration for a function time_keeper which returns an object of type TimeKeeper and has a single (unnamed) parameter which is a function returning type Timer (and taking no input). (See Function object#In C and C++)

Most programmers expect the first, but the C++ standard requires it to be interpreted as the second.

File: 1356833734062.png (24KB, 239x281px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 239x281px

WHAT THE HELL, MAN?
THAT'S A TOAD, NOT A FROG!
I AM UNSUBSCRIBING FROM THIS BIASED NEWSPAPER!
LIBERAL MAINSTREAM MEDIA HAS DONE IT AGAIN!

File: swen_yoshi.jpg (90KB, 960x678px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 960x678px

>>4602234
pls dont unsubscribe or da peek'll en-up like da poke