Previous:
>>17483326
So it begins again
>>17507515
This reminded me of when I was younger. The hair and pose.
I fucked the 2nd oldest daughter.
Then the 3rd oldest.
Then the 4th oldest boy seen me getting duiick sucked by the 2nd and 3rd and I had to let him suck me or he would tell.
Weird but good times.
>>17508595
Whut?
Do wigs count?
>>17509503
What do you people consider "short hair"? Cause to me, it would be above or at the ears.
>>17508595
So now the board Indians are RPing, great.
>>17509503
If it goes past their jaw line there is no way you can consider that short. It's medium at best.
>>17509622
correct.
More of her? She's perfect, I need more
Moar ?
>>17510172
Thanks, I'm good
>>17510172
please
>>17510172
hell yes
>>17510172
Enough with her already, literally thousands of pics have been uploaded and links have been posted in every thread from skinny to bbw to feet to short hair to YLYL
>>17510172
My faps wtf. Pls post more!
>>17511446
>>17510619
>>17510409
guys, look in the previous thread(s)
there is a something as too much, even of a good thing. eg. heroine.
>>17510726
what he said.
>>17509878
You know, that got me thinking. 4chan's containment boards technically are designated shitting streets.
how likey a short hair chick will be a lez? My ex broke up with me, then she cut into a short hair....it's like......1 to 2 inch short
>>17515191
Designated shit(pos)ting streets
Anybody know who she is?
>>17515965
filename
>>17507515
who dis?
>>17510060
>>17510058
>>17510052
Sauce/name
>>17516500
Bless ya anon
Any love for the ones getting shorn?
>>17516500
Did not realize she was going to be such a train wreck.
Wtf
>>17516846
gonna level with you,
how could you not deduce that from that pic
>>17507516
moar?
>>17517735
left pic has a serious trap-vibe going on, wew.
>>17517636
Oh I knew it would be bad. Dyed blue hair, the boots (fuckin trusties man) sipping tea on an old couch covered by a bed spread. I was anticipating bad. Just not that bad.
>>17518739
>>17518740
>>17510172
What's her name? Love this girl
>>17519043
who is this beauty again?
This thread is the same everytime
It's a bit depressing
>>17519186
>>17519188
http://www.kindgirls.com/gallery/metart/liza_74644/3569/liza
>>17519191
can we differentiate between "short-haired females" and "gender queer?" K thx.
>>17518705
HNNNNNNNNNNNNGH
>>17519550
obligatory
>>17519614
>>17519616
>>17519617
>>17519549
Why should we you pussy? As long as they're all women.
>>17519024
holly smith; look in the previous thread, theres 2 links for pics/vids
>>17519024
https://eroshare.com/ejc1mwbl
>>17519699
Name?
>>17519644
That's just my point. If they're gender queer, they're not women, they're non-binary. Looking to fap to cisgendered only, thankyouverymuch.
Large-breasted trans also acceptable.
>>17519705
<3
>>17507515
Source or name?
Bumping a beautiful thing.
>>17519987
get the fuck out of here
>>17519987
>gender queer
>non binary
you wont jerk off to imaginary genders? if its a dude who got his dick cut off, i understand, but if its and edgy woman your dick goes limp?
faggot.
>>17519047
if only she had a tasteful bush, then she'd be completely perfect.
>>17519043
name?
>>17521219
THIS
>>17521222
and add this anon to that^
>>17519992
>>17519705
how are other women supposed to compete?
>>17516816
more fully shaven females please
>>17522529
>>17522532
>>17522533
>>17522534
>>17522537
>>17522540
>>17522543
>>17522545
>>17522529
>>17522532
>>17522533
>>17522534
>>17522537
>>17522540
>>17522543
>>17522545
Does this angel have a name?
>>17522549
twitter: quid pro crow
@crowmunist
insta: crowmunist
an SJW but I don't care
>>17522553
sjws deserve nuclear fire
>>17522548
>>17522577
>>17522580
>>17522587
>>17522594
>>17519043
Time to save this thread !
>>17522984
>>17522988
>>17522996
>>17522996
Source???
>>17519616
Cute
>>17523000
>>17523005
fuck off
>>17523015
>>17521219
>edgy women
I'm all for edgy women, but there are non-gendered non-binary people out there who straddle the line. Androgynous =/= short hair.
>>17523022
>>17523023
you faggots and all your labels and qualifications
>>17516719
Seconding this, IQDB/etc brings up nothing
>>17523023
>non-gendered non-binary
again, these distinctions don't matter because they're not real.
>>17523121
I'm a firm believe that Florida isn't real and yet I'm told it's not up to me.
>>17523121
Neither is your heterosexuality
>>17523149
>found the post-modernist
are you gonna take my computer hostage like evergreen?
>>17507516
I remember that as being the rumored Zeriyah nudes
>>17523121
>>17523155
>
>>17523064
This.
How about posting a fucking picture?
>>17519614
>>17519616
>>17519617
>>17519619
she has such a pretty face. are there nudes out there?
I'm finally ending 30 days of nofap and I'd love to finish to her
>>17523341
>nudes
You wish. And so do I.
Posting in a glorious thread.
>>17518740
name
>>17513046
hnnnnnnngggg
>>17525061
http://www.suicidegirls.com/members/rango/album/2527999/invincible-summer/
>>17513046
Is that clickflashwhirr?
Any Amelia/tsubakiscarlet?
>>17525998
Couldn't find anything with image search. Who is she?
>>17523141
Florida exists outside of your trust fund head
>it's a "let's have another thread using the same damn tired pictures of whites and ugly sluts with hairstyles that don't fit them" episode
I hate you faggots so god damn much, you ruined a perfectly good niche for me and I'll never be able to enjoy it the same way again
>>17523141
Considering I live in Florida you are quite wrong
>>17526537
holy shit you're a whiny little bitch. how about posting some of your own original pics you lazy cunt?
>>17526338
>implying there are no trust funds in Florida
Are you >implying rich people don't go to Florida? Ever hear of an exclusive resort called Mar-a-lago?
>>17526539
ah yes, but how can you be sure.
>>17526537
>hairstyles that don't fit them
Says you.
>>17513036
Faaaaaaaaaaacuk in love
>>17509975
"Can I speak to the manager?"
>>17527051
"Yes you may."
*unzips pants*
>>17519707
Sauce?
>>17516816
Not my kink. Different thread with this!
>>17509979
This looks like Adam Scott.
>>17522584
>>17522577
>>17522580
Stop posting men, please.
>>17507518
More?
>>17526326
Crystal Thierry, aka page 73 girl
>>17527447
Wishful thinking on your part
I'VE GOT STUFF
>>17527518
>>17527519
>>17527521
>>17527523
>>17527525
>>17527527
>>17527530
>>17527531
>>17527533
>>17527534
>>17527535
>>17527536
>>17527541
>>17527542
>>17527545
>>17527547
Fo Porter is perfect
>>17527548
>>17527550
>>17527551
>>17527552
>>17527555
>>17527557
>>17527558
And all out of Fo.
>>17527559
>>17527561
>>17527563
Anyone even in here?
>>17527564
>>17527566
>>17527568
>>17527564
Welp, image limit, anyway. Will continue dumping what I have left if anyone is around to make a new thread.
>>17527499
>>17527498
ah, emmpot
>>17527519
that's perky, alright
>>17527564
I need a name
>>17529078
Okay. How's "Bill" work for you?
no sadder words on the internet than
>image limit reached
>>17527572
On it.
NEW/NEXT
>>17529125
>>17529125
>>17529125
>>17510172
lmao this fucking faggot is literally cancering up every board
Epic thread.
Perfection.
>>17507515
Would be so much better if this was a boy.
Remove tits, add dick. Perfect.
>>17519106
sveta from Herge many years ago
>>17509878
p a j e e t w a v e
>>17507519
Holy shit, what's her name?
>>17526537
>hairstyles that don't fit them
Some are like this but most are ok anon
>>17519987
>gender queer
>non-binary
Dude what are you even talking about
>>17534060
they're postmodernist/neomarxist buzzwords that thoughtlessly and arbitrarily try to erase well established and firmly confirmed structures
denying the fact that humans are a dimorphic species is just one of many cases where this cancer festers
>>17522709
Sauce, man. I need sauce !
>>17534217
Dude what are you even talking about
>>17534217
"postmodern" doesn't apply to human sexuality, language ebbs and flows and is constantly changing, this isn't architecture. "Neomarxist" doesn't apply here at all, it's an economic term you're using in an attempt to sound smart.
>Well established and confirmed structures.
Um, well yes, the old, binary terms were indeed established and confirmed as true. Now they're evolving into something else. Get woke.
>tl;dr
"Every human falls into one of two categories" = False.
>>17535173
>Now they're evolving into something else. Get woke
no, they arent.
>"Every human falls into one of two categories" = False
humans are a sexually dimorphic species, there are only two.
>"postmodern" doesn't apply to human sexuality
postmodernism pushes the idea that there is no truth, and everything is relative. eventually this type of thinking would get to a point like this.
>Neomarxist" doesn't apply here at all, it's an economic term you're using in an attempt to sound smart.
neomarxism is a term used for when people used the ideas of power structure from marxism and apply it to things other than economics. examples are identity politics, etc.
>tl;dr
its not people trying to sound smart, its you not understanding you've been brainwashed into being a neo-commie under the trojan horse of equality and understanding.
>>17534659
hes talking about how these 3rd party gender "identities" are a smokescreen for postmodern/neomarxist ideology, and aren't actually real. science proves it, until these ideologues ruin science (which they are trying to do) like they have the humanities.
Sabrina Nichole
>>17535193
even taking this reply at face value, we can now apply "postmodernism," which would then negate your previous argument, but neomarxism doesn't apply because it's only you using it, not anyone else.
You're speaking in terms of strictly procreation, and literally no one is in this thread to procreate, my man, we're here to rub one out and then get back to our preferred SFW board.
>>17535202
>additional sexualities are false, because the only definition of sex is P in the V
I have some badass hermaphrodite porn to show you, since this is clearly someone's first day on the internet.
>>17535717
This
>>17535173
>"postmodern" doesn't apply to human sexuality, language ebbs and flows and is constantly changing, this isn't architecture. "Neomarxist" doesn't apply here at all, it's an economic term you're using in an attempt to sound smart.
you have no idea what these terms actually mean and how the core ideologies are wielded by the chaotic social justice movement that is very very tightly tied in far left gender and queer politics
>>17535173
>Um, well yes, the old, binary terms were indeed established and confirmed as true. Now they're evolving into something else. Get woke.
no, the underlying structures that the terms point to are scientifically well established and factual, being that humans come in two distinct forms (male and female), and "gender" mirrors this binary to the point that is nearly a perfect correlation statistically (which shows that gender is by definition not independent from sex)
sjws on the other hand are trying to re-invent the system including inventing new words that point to a new structure that has no basis in anything other than their volatile revolutionary ideologies that spit in the face of science
>>17535173
>"Every human falls into one of two categories" = False.
when it comes to gender, every human does indeed fall into one of two categories due to dimorphism
extremely rare genetic anomalies do not count as new genders or new sexes, and your gender is also not simply some kind of "decision" that you make
as a side note, I used to joke around saying obvious garbage like "biological sex is a social construct" until I actually saw some retarded abomination of a "professor" state exactly that on national television (Canadian I think) with a serious face
>>17535717
you cant even keep your own ideology together, can you
>sex and gender are different
>but they are the same when its adventageous for my side.
also hermaphroditism or intersex is a birth defect, not another gender/biological sex.
>>17535714
i'm not the op you were replying to at first, just thought i'd point out your ignorance to the bullshit you're spreading.
>>17508530
<3 <3 <3
winona ryderish
>>17535724
>rigidly defining gender according to whether someone ejaculates sperm, or carries the egg
You know what, I'm not even sure if we're debating gender/sex/identity anymore, and I'm not sure you are either.
My original comment was that a girl ITT looked like she had a genderqueer identity, and you started shouting about how they're definitely female because they have ovaries (even though you can't see them).
At best, we're debating apples vs oranges. At worst, you're trying to hammer all humans into a rigid binary structure that humans don't really allow for, because gender (regardless of sex) can be fluid and diverse, like humans themselves.
>>17536054
>make a joke about hermaphrodites
>someone explains hermaphrodites to you
You must be fun at parties.
>>17536728
>"You must be fun at parties"
>Is complaining about the possibility of women in a porn thread having a different personality than expected
>>17536728
>At best, we're debating apples vs oranges. At worst, you're trying to hammer all humans into a rigid binary structure that humans don't really allow for, because gender (regardless of sex) can be fluid and diverse, like humans themselves.
we find the main problem with your side.
you seem to be confusing gender identity with personality.
>and you started shouting about how they're definitely female because they have ovaries
also you don't seem to see that you're talking to a few different people, and assuming intent. i wasnt the first response, and i doubt they were shouting, just responding.
>>17536728
>you started shouting about how they're definitely female because they have ovaries
I did no such thing
>>17519711
Bruh
>>17522607
Fucking hell. An absolute beauty. Who is she?
>>17538576
Lydia Graham