Take the goods and hide 'em. Post your sweater meat, et al.
>>17502082
this
>>17501698
TFW your tits are so big you can't see the stain on your shirt
>>17502082
>to try and
*to try to
>>17501651
>>17501653
Sauce?
>>17502184
Both are right. Look it up yourself if you don't believe me. You're really not doing OP any favors by following in his footsteps.
>>17502276
She spilled yogurt all over herself. What a slob..
>>17502238
>Both are right.
You probably think that using "they" as a singular pronoun is """right""", too.
A construction becomes "correct" NEITHER by entering common use NOR by being forced on the masses from above. Rather, it's correct by virtue of being less ambiguous than its alternatives.
The purpose of language is clear and unambiguous communication, with a minimum of possible confusion. Adhering to rules with minimal exceptions decreases the likelihood of misunderstanding.
>>17502082
Back to /pol/ grammar Nazi!!
Not sure how y'all feel about traps, but enjoy some OC
"Another one"
-DJ Khaled
>>17501649
bump
>>17502566
Who is she?
>>17502370
I see London, I see France, I see her pierced nips through her shirt
>>17502942
I hate reading novels written by someone with a mindset like this.
good thread op.
>>17503870
>>17502942
tl;dr
>>17502281
This bitch has rabies!
>>17503874
Mother of god... name?
>>17503878
Ancient traditions are not necessarily good traditions.
Pretty languages are not necessarily good languages.
Something that's "good enough" may still have room for improvement.
>>17502906
People also used to use double negatives for emphasis. Do you really think you're making a good arguement?
>>17502942
What the fuck is wrong with you??
>>17503864
Aah, Christinamodel. How old is she now?
>>17503988
>I don't want my language to make any sense: the post
>>17502527
I think that using one set of quotation marks is right, and using more than that is autistic. I also think that if major linguistic authorities agree that a fucking idiom is fine to use, it's probably fine. You fucking retard. Nobody has a problem with "and try" except elitist fuckheads like you. What you're advocating for is a complete denial of expressiveness in language. George Orwell wrote a book about that. It was called 1984. Read it sometime, pick.
By the way, bring it on, fuckhole mods. I'm talking about English grammar on /s/ instead of posting endless location and sauce threads. I'm clearly the problem here. Don't warn me and delete my posts like a fucking pussy. Just ban me. Fucking sack up and do it.
>>17501656
Ungft
>>17502391
>>17502395
>>17502400
I live for this shit
>>17503921
Idk but here's more
>>17504514
Name? Moar
>>17506309
That's a pretty terrible 'shop.
>>17506325
>>17506322
>>17506318
I know I should not be attracted to Venti, but god damn I'd bend her over, eat her arse then fuck her until she passes out, or I do.
>>17502527
Ambiguity begets art in a major way. If unambiguity were the only goal of a language, you'd have lojban
>>17505882
You lose some of your credibility when you use terms like autistic to mean incorrect, while arguing about common usage and terminology.
That said, I don't see why we're arguing semantics in /s.
>>17502527
Stop posting underage girls.
>>17506277
>>17506306
WTF is this, pics for ants?
>>17507129
Yah
>>17507129
Why shouldn't you be attracted to her tho?
>>17504514
i'm in love
>>17507129
nothing wrong with liking a sexy gamer gril with gigantic tiddies and supremely fertile child bearing hips
>>17507974
Also v legitimately funny character
>>17506306
made me wanna fuck a fat girl in mountain scenerey
>>17502654
http://35photo.ru/davidfotographer
>when costuming ran out of big coats
I saw this slut on random news report the other day and she was wearing this big trench coat and immediately knew she was trying to hide her tits, the shape of her body was obvious. Google her name and lone behold I was right again.
Lone and behold
>>17509218
whom
>>17509343
gorgeous
>>17509343
whomst?
image unrelated but kristen stewart needs to peg me
makes u thimk
>>17503879
rutgers strong! smash racism!
friend's gf was cold
>>17510086
interested on pic story
What happened to her arm?????
>>17503874
>>17503921
>>17506301
Abigail McCabe
>>17510125
the story was pretty much posted along with the pic. nothing too interesting, just a quick picture they didn't notice i took
>>17502191
katrina hartlova katerina katrin ... something like that. I'm not usually into boobs this big, but this girl makes me horny as hell.
wwyd?
>>17510412
turn 360 degrees and walk away
Why would you post a tiny picture of an ugly fat chick with her tits out of view in a sweater puppy thread?
>>17510412
Essentially this >>17510458
>>17510458
>360 degrees
>you're still walking towards her
>>17502570
thats a tarp? Really?
>>17510143
More pics?
>>17503874
I mean, girl on the left has nice tits and all, but looking at this picture I can't help but wonder "HOW THE FUCK CAN YOU MAKE FRIED CHICKEN AND APPLE PIE WITHOUT GLUTEN?!"
>>17502191
Katarina Debrova/Hartlova. I've seen her in stuff from scoregroup.
>>17512309
Different flours. Neither strictly need wheat flour.
You can make apple pie with rice or tapioca flour, it's just not usually as good.
Fried chicken can be cooked with all sorts of stuff - corn meal is particularly nice.
>>17512353
That said, unless you have celiacs or a wheat allergy, there's really no point in going gluten free. The diets that avoid it are bs.
bitch on instagtam, follow her!! she really likes dicks
>>17506306
why bother posting that fucking whale
>>17514358
>>17514359
>>17513568
I like her eyes but she's such a dumb whore
>>17514298
Sauce?
>>17509732
Use "whom" only when the indirect object of a sentence. i.e. "Billy threw the ball to Jill." Jill is the indirect object: "To whom did Billy throw the ball?" would be a correct use of the word.
Also, Julia, or Julia Boin, as she is sometimes known, is the woman in question.
>>17515014
Sorry, that should be, "Use 'whom' only WITH the indirect object of a sentence"
I'm drunk: cut me a break.
>>17514442
So? It's not like this is a "Who would you wife up?" thread.
>>17512309
Corn meal.
>>17502570
Don't blur bitches' fucking faces you spastic cunt. Off yourself. White knight queer.
>>17516851
>DSC_0490
>"Enjoy some OC"
>claims of trap but no visible evidence
Just think about it for a second anon.