Pixies a must.
>>17299502
>>17299501
Wew lad..
>>17299515
I KNOW
shadilay
>>17301705
oh god is that the girl from that one infowars video?
>>17302200
A N T I F A F U
N
T
I
F
A
F
U
>>17299498
this is a very beautiful photo, artistically and aesthetically. You could hang this shit in a gallery and get no doubletakes
>>17302611
>>17302514
yes, but it does not follow the rules of composition, therefore is not artistic. please go to school.
>>17299498
>>17302514
except for that big stupid shit in her ear.
Radio-DJ
>>17299498
good god she is perfect! Picturing her handcuffed and collared.
>>17302200
link the video pls
>>17301705
shadilay
>>17302642
>visual arts degree
>school
>>17303175
CUTE
mhmm
*chew*
we need some nationalist women to take the short hair look back.
>>17302642
>the rules of composition
Their are no rules in how you make art. As long as it is made as an expression of creativity it's art. Granted not all art is worthy of recognition, but still art.
>>17302642
t. Jobless art major
>>17303579
can't find source, do you have it?
>>17302642
That is possibly the stupidest reason to not call something art. seriously kys
>>17302642
>you have to go to school to know what art is
>the rules of composition must be followed or it isnt art
lemme let you in on a secret: your teachers only taught you those rules in the hopes that maybe 1 in 10000 students would learn them to break them. Are you that student? Has following the rules worked for you so far?
>>17304845
Word.
>>17302642
don't make fun of this guy, he could easily be the next Hitler.
word
>>17305062
We better just kill him now them, just to be safe.
>>17305933
I know her friend.
This one went to Binghamton but lives in NYC now I believe.
>>17303430
I don't know man, I feel like art probably is objective.
Just because we can't quantify something doesn't mean it can't be quantified. We actually can quantify it on some level. If you compare a piece by a master level artist to something drawn by a literal retard, we can all agree which is superior.
There's no intangible magic in the universe.
>>17306092
One guy put a toilet bowl in an art gallery, the other shat in a can.
>If you compare a piece by a master level artist to something drawn by a literal retard, we can all agree which is superior.
On technical level maybe, but which one is more expressive, which one is more artistically fulfilling for the artist?
>>17299932
No monkeys, please.
>>17299970
iDubzzz hormonoly confused twin sister confirmed
Thread is workin'.
>>17306152
GTFO of this thread then.
>>17306700
NO YOU
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>17306650
Jesus christ my dick just burst
>>17306146
I come to s to masturbate, not to read about the philosophy of art.
Fucking 4chan
>>17303923
I'd let her be my boyfriend
>>17303923
Be my pimp, Jhonny-Girl!
Sup /s/.
Muh favorite.
>>17306650
mhm, actually saved.
>>17308367
>>17303824
that camera has sensor damage, or the photographer used shit compression. Still a great photo tho
>>17309193
A lot of this thread looks like boys with bad hair cuts
>>17308209
Name please.
>>17312476
Never mind, found her.
>Ollethe, Suicide girls
>>17311621
please no
top this.
>>17303092
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRq4EAbhheE
>>17312535
she reminds me of that french decibelle chick. who is she?
>>17306611
Damn
who??
>>17306092
>Just because we can't quantify something doesn't mean it can't be quantified.
This says it all pretty concisely, though unfortunately you go on to contradict the logical consequences of your position.
The brain is a finite state machine, like everything else we've ever observed in the universe. Its means for perception is limited, therefore so are its means for perceiving artistic value. The layout and nature of its machinery might cluster heavily, but there are few truly universal higher level features. This is what "subjectivity" is based on. The systems measuring and interpreting the objective.
>>17313267
ura penchen thx to google img search
>>17313752
*edit Ura Pechen
>>17304845
You're just as wrong as the post you're replying to.
You have to learn the rules and have the skill to follow them well before you can break them in a meaningful way.
>>17312428
how old are you
>12
>17313278
Name?
A personal favorite.
close enough
classic
mmm
>>17311625
Statements like this do less to show that you don't like short-haired girls, and more to show that you want to fuck long-haired men.
>>17306152
shut it faggot
Sup.
>>17316968
paige judd
>>17302642
Doesn't the shadow line form a pleasing proportion with the frame? I also thought the richer color of her skin contrasts well with the less saturated brown of the background.
The bright sunlight washes out the floor and some details of her lower body, but her face and shoulders are clearly emphasized.
Her form is uncomfortably close to the edge of the photo, but it was probably cropped later. It needs more border. I imagine this is your biggest complaint.
Her pose is emotionally subdued, with calm downwards eyeline and a stable triangular form.
And how can anyone say that a healthy body has bad composition? Human proportions are a big part of the foundation of all formal ideas on composition.
Any shitwank on the internet can say "that sucks". But do you actually have a reason for your opinion you can communicate? If you can tell us why it's bad and what can be done to improve it, you might help us understand composition better, making us better consumers and producers of art. We might have a productive discussion. We might even be impressed with your knowledge! (But I wouldn't count on it.)
Just stating your opinion without any reason is the most fucking worthless waste of time, more masturbatory than masturbating.
>>17319459
IMHO, just a bit TOO short.
>>17311709
diamonds
>>17313147
Christ, are all American women this insufferable?
Next time someone makes a short hair thread, post a thread rule that they have to be naked. These threads are wasted on a bunch of NN bullshit.
>>17321868
Next time some whinefag bitches about a thread without contributing an example of something supposedly better, he should then be forced to kill himself.
>>17306092
>If you compare a piece by a master level artist to something drawn by a literal retard, we can all agree which is superior.
Yes, but art is subjective because the finest Pointillism, Cubism, Modernism and Renaissance are all superior, but not all of them count as things that are appreciated. I think Renoir is the master of all and Jackson Pollock is taking the piss. Doesn't mean I'm right. Or wrong. Thus it's subjective, thus you're wrong. So shut up.
>>17306092
High art snobbery is just political. Some people are just respected in that high art society and they basically get to make the rules with what they prefer. But beauty is still in the eye of the beholder, which is why there are hoards of people who prefer anime to abstract art. It doesn't mean one is better than the other.
>>17321887
>irony
>>17299970
Is that Lena Dunham?
DISGOSTAN'
>>17313540
Lol classic pre-Kantian fallacy. You just assume without argument that the world of objects is prior to subjectivity and consciousness, even though we have just as much reason to believe the opposite is true.
Also some of the tits in this thread gave diamonds to my diamonds
>>17313147
>>17303200
>>17303175
>>17301705
>>17301709
>>17303327
>>17303326
Man the video shatters my illusions of her good looks that the pictures create in this thread. Selfies are such bullshit.
>>17306031
Who the Fuck Is That ?
>>17322480
OP didn't "whine" about the thread. Just saying.
Best "short hair" thread in awhile. Thanks posters.
>>17322951
>>17322954
>>17322963
>>17322979
>>17322965
>>17322980
>>17322983
>>17322985
>>17322989
>>17322991
>>17322993
>>17322995
>>17322999
>>17323001
>>17323004
>>17323006
>>17323007
>>17323015
>>17323017
>>17303430
>Their are no rules in how you make art
Retard detected
>>17323018
>>17323032
>>17323035
>>17323038
>>17304845
Class warrior justifying their lack of education.
Ignorance is not a merit.
>>17323143
>>17323144
>>17323145
>>17323150
>>17323159
>>17323164
>>17323169
>>17323187
>>17306152
Retard
>>17322853
whats with the quote marks?
>>17322824
Who is she ?
check out all of them https://eroshare.com/qtp0ns3j
>>17325105
https://eroshare.com/qtp0ns3j
>>17323025
Because there are no rules in how you make art you autistic piece of shit.
>>17300489
Sauce?
>>17324684
Do you have more of her?
>>17312379
wut
>>17322354
WHO
Mila
>>17306251
Name?
>>17314642
Sauce?
>>17306650
Cute girl. Cute necklace. NAME?
>>17326069
Why do anons like this always have to come along and shit up a perfectly good thread.
>>17327560
Too picky. Would still fuck.
>>17299971
what time period was this photo taken?
>>17327560
sorry it's not cock dude. try the gay thread instead. or better yet how about you post something better?
>>17327560
spotted the cuck
Does anyone here have a picture from the other short hair girl thread? it was some tumblr looking girl with glasses and dyed hair with a black shirt
1/6
>>17328642
Cap :(
>>17323018
Cute, any more? Or name, sc, insta?
>>17325814
Sara, Wicked Weasel (see imagefap)
>>17303280
Sauce?!?!?!?!
>>17313157
Go look up Lenya on xhamster or imagefap, you'll find her
>>17306152
fuck off faggot
>>17328635
>>17328639
>>17328641
>>17328642
Ugly as fuck
>>17331661
Bet your mother dropped you on your head when you were little. On purpose.
>>17322983
Holy fuck her eyes
>>17313540
Just because something is finite doesn't mean it can't describe an infinite.
Take the numbers 1,2,3,4 and 5. The difference between them is finite and easily countable. But the number of numbers between the two points is infinite. If you count in tenths you get 1.1, 1.2 and so on and once you reach 5 go back and count between in hundredths 1.11, 1.12...
My computer is finite, it's harddrive is finite and yet in this small javascript reply to popup I have described something which is infinite.
>>17328061
I LITERALLY STARTED THIS THREAD
>>17332253
So go start another one whinefag
>>17313272
Anymore of her? She looks sooo much like an ex of mine.
>>17312428
pounding femme twinks up their dirty asses is an even better way but hey, why not both?
Best short hair pornstars? Blonde hair pref
>>17332484
Makenna Blue
>>17321863
obviously.
>>17322860
those eyebrows are quite...vigorous...
>>17315632
his point still stands.
just because something doesn't follow the "rules" doesn't ,mean it's not art.
>>17321360
Thank you, please continue to shut down more pretentious asshats in the future.
>>17302642
This comment is funny because the photograph follows both the rule of thirds and the golden mean.
>>17312535
I'd rather have her on top of me :^)
>>17299501
>>17299502
In what universe is that a tomboy?
>>17299506
I've seen this pic quite a number of times, but who is she? I got to know!
>>17334589
Melissa Clarke. You can google here and find some ridiculously hot pics I can't post because this thread reached the image limit, although she doesn't look as perfect now as she did back then (drinking is England's national sport, and that's taken its toll on her).
>>17334602
*google her
Fuck, no more drinking on weeknights
>>17325815
looks like Emily Argen
>>17332253
Props, nigger. I came plenty
>>17303280
hot damn
>>17323190
moar or sauce
>>17325109
WHOOO
>>17308209
That's essence suicide, right? Man I love her stuff, I wish I could find it all again
>>17316956
I like her too, keep going
>>17312379
sheit she's fit
>>17317056
the real life Zarya... I love her
>>17311440
That ladyboy has the prettiest eyes I've ever seen.
>>17323122
Art school is bullshit. In Europe it's where poor people go if they can't afford real school and in America it's where rich people go because they don't need real jobs.
>>17323164
I'm supposed to pretend this is attractive to empower her, right?
>>17335249
We're supposed to think this is funny to enable your self-denying faggotry right?
>>17312428
>addtext . com
kek
>>17323164
who the fuck is this weab slut and why is her pussy and nignog mulato nose so appealing?
>>17303430
No.
>>17299501
>>17299502
Short hair is a good look for her. Just barely keeps her from looking like "generic blonde whore model no. 5"
>>17306611
>>17313267
>>17313752
Ura Pechen is the photographer. The model's name is Sveta Grachtchenkova.
Cunt
>>17323312
Grow some taste.
>>17335256
She's a fucking gargoyle.
>>17337302
And you're a whiny bitch. We all have our crosses to bear
>>17324535
which suicide girl is this?
>>17323015
WHEW
>>17323015
5 years into gulag and chill and she gives you this look
>>17337325
>>17337325
What exactly does a bear holding a heavy cross look like? Please explain.
>>17302534
What in the hell
>>17338994
Your mother
>>17322954
Holy shit I think I have this magazine issue in my dad's bathroom.
>>17336403
>Sveta Grachtchenkova
Thanks anon.
>>17334583
The universe in which she's holding a tool, so she's, like, soooo macho
>>17306650
I knew this girl. Every time someone posts this picture, I'm reminded of the time I first posted it. Her name is Nicole Larking. She's English. And the I used the picture in a "how to get over her" thread. It brings up all sorts of memories when I see her. Damn.
New thread
>>17342577
>>17342577
>>17342577
>>17342577
>>17306155
So chris ray gun
>>17312428
>Implying I wouldn't fuck someone like Buck Angel
>>17312535
>dat "me oh my, whatever could you be looking at?" off-camera look
perfect
>came to see pixie thread
>instead, retards posting cropped faces, and non nude fucking everywhere
>insecure fuccboi faggots bitching about pixie chicks
literally stop wasting my oxygen you useless sacks of human garbage
>>17345007
>Marsha Marsha Marsha!
Butthurt whinefag
>>17328570
Her name?