Dark Mistresses

File: Cathar2.png (5MB, 1192x4224px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 1192x4224px

>>17213826

File: Shosanna_smokes.jpg (770KB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]

770KB, 1920x800px

>>17213828
Doesn't have to be dark hair and pale. As long as there's a cold look

File: adad.png (786KB, 1880x998px) Image search: [Google]

786KB, 1880x998px

>>17213831

File: 1406635100120.jpg (184KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 3000x2000px

>>17213833

File: -2016-1-2.jpg (292KB, 818x1100px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 818x1100px

>>17213834

File: fei-wang-1104fecf95974c8bba65f47a0064414a.jpg (43KB, 550x792px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 550x792px

>>17213838

Autism the thread

>>17213891
Nice buzzword. Seriously, think about what you just said. How does that relate in any way?

>>17213894
Should have said agnosia the thread. You're right autism is a broad term.

>>17213916
So... because someone likes a particular type of woman he has brain damage? Or do you mean from the woman's perspective and not me?

>>17213930
I mean it is difficult to read, "coldness" into some of the images posted. Ultimately, the person viewing the image makes a personal decision on the models' facial expression.

Making a thread on a widely subjective topic leaves room for interpretation.

>>17213947
I would say most of the images posted have cold expressions. Maybe not some of them in my compilation post here >>17213828

but it's also about dark hair and pale complexion.

>>17213952
Also I sort of mispoke. I didn't mean JUST cold.

File: Sarah_Piantadosi_Codie_Young_Terry_De_Havilland_6.jpg (146KB, 768x1000px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 768x1000px

>>17213831

File: Codie_Young_1.jpg (61KB, 549x827px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 549x827px

>>17214039

File: medium_portrait (1).jpg (87KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 540x720px

>>17214040

>>17214043
lily mcmenamy

File: lana-del-rey-big-eyes.jpg (70KB, 620x554px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 620x554px

>>17214043

File: 1483114160084.jpg (59KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 640x640px

>>17214086

File: abra1188683.jpg (202KB, 1400x788px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1400x788px

>>17214088

>>17214063
OP here. Who is she? She fits it exactly.

Op again. And thanks everyone. I went away for a bit and didn't expect these replies.

>>17214399
Seriously, she's close to my perfect type.

>>17213947
God forbid you have to think for yourself.

File: Catharine 2017.png (627KB, 690x722px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 690x722px

>>17214412
I've just added her to my new ideal type comp

>>17214399
Seriously...she is the same person as your pic...

>>17214502
What pic? I know all of the people in my images. She's definitely not.

>>17214516
Christ. That's Eva Green? Sorry, my bad. I just did a reverse search. That's weird...She didn't look like her. Never seen that pic before.

>>17214074
oh god yes. And when her and barb are all snuggled up in bed.

>>17214422
Not him, but I kinda agree - of course I can interpret op-text and the first pictures and arrive at a conclusion - but thats not necessarily the same conclusion for everyone, as op-text is incredibly broad.

Per se, there is no problem with that - but, as I've come to know this board, such broad threads without clear direction can only lead to two results:
Either, only op posts whilst others lurk or discuss the topic, going in circles ad nauseam.
Or, someone else starts posting something, that belongs in the thread according to how he understood op - but doesn't belong according to others. Which leads to the same ad nauseam discussions which will only die off, whence the thread dies...

TL;DR: RIP thread

>>17215374
This is an image discussion site.

File: jepsen-v.jpg (296KB, 1000x624px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1000x624px

>>17215374
If you would just post pictures of girls you think fit the type instead of blathering on like some kind of autistic, this wouldn't have happened.

>>17213947
And then you can post pics you like and if someone posts pics you don't like you don't look at them.

>>17213947
t.icefag