This sort of body type - muscular but not obscenely so, and thick as hell.
Short hair/pierced nipples a plus.
Loving it so far!
The exact thread i came here for
does she take dick? Hot for sure!
>>16987311
She's bi
She redeems Australia for all their shitposting
>>16988096
Almost.
Those inverted cunts.
>>16987310
that leg looks way weird.
>>16988096
Nah, she brings a whole other set of shit to the table. She, like a lot of Aussie chicks these days, is a bit of an insufferable SJW.
>>16988152
eh. that's actually slightly less shitposty than people whining about SJW boogeymans.
>wahh people don't like when i'm an asshole, it's everyone elses fault!
>>16983625
Stefania is my favorite thanks op!
>>16988313
I get the people who whine about them can be annoying too, but the only people who deny they exist and refer to them as a nonexistent boogeyman are either people obfuscating because the term hits too close to home or those who just don't know what they're talking about.
They're very real. They're not a boogeyman. They're nowhere near as innocuous as you make them sound.
Stefania is a beautiful world class woman, but she wears her politics on her sleeve. You can't look at any of her profiles without getting a big fat dose of them so comments on them are unavoidable.
Why so little hair? Steroids?
>>16989412
IIRC she shaved her head for a charity thing and she liked the result in the end
>>16989487
She looks so much better like that though holy shit
Way better with short hair.
>>16988624
The boogeyman talk doesn't allude to them existing -at all-; of course they exist, they live in Brooklyn, Austin and SF. They nest in Tumblr. The boogeyman refers to them -overruning- the site, trying to make it politically correct and non-'problematic'
>>16989585
>>16990630
She's just aesthetic as hell, can wear both perfectly.
What do y'all prefer, blonde or brunette?
Also, did she get a boob job or is it just the way her fat distributes?
>>16990684
Well, there's already evidence of various subreddits, s4s, int, and lgbt raiding different boards. This conflict between 'sjws' and their opposers has been going on for around 3 years.
Honestly, I'd rather have them all fuck off, but that's not happening any time soon.
>>16990696
I ask cause pictures like this seem all around thicker, but the breasts look larger as well. Probably just has killer genes.
>>16988152
How so?
I swear, this woman is as close to perfect physique as a lady can get.
>23
What am I doing with my life...
>>16983625
>Burly women
>>16983625
She is so beautiful! I love her! Gorgeous!
>>16992374
>Thickset
>Muscly
Cmon, you really trying to say she does nothing for you?
This is how your woman would look if she had damn near perfect fat distribution and pulled her weight around the farm. She wouldn't be as manicured, but I think that's a plus.
>>16992492
... They are called Burly.
>>16992506
Yes, I just assumed like an asshole it was intended to contest their attractiveness.
My bad.
>>16992259
Two things about getting older they don't prepare you for:
1. Eventually jerking off to people younger, more beautiful and much more accomplished in life than you.
2. Watching everyone you look up to (actors, musicians, comedians, etc) die because they're all inevitably decades older than you with nobody to replace them.
>>16991499
My guess would be the fact she's super into body positivity to the point she spams "DropThePlus" hashtags everywhere and buys into some of the more delusional aspects of that line of thinking.
/s/, why is Stefania perfection?
I remember I had this mental picture in my mind of the perfect woman; thick, below-average height, muscular but not to the point where it's distinct and defined (think hardbody), with short hair a plus. Australia was also always one of my favorite countries.
May I say, when I discovered Stefania Ferrario, my cockhead chafed against my popcorn ceiling my dick grew so much.
she's seriously perfection
>>16994362
Go back where you came from, shitslave.
>>16993478
>below-average height
5'8" is below average for females in your country?
>>16994295
As close as humanly possible.
>>16993429
To real, man. It's true, but just wasn't ready.
>>16994499
Maybe not below-average, but given how 'big' she looks in the pictures she's in, you'd expect her to be taller than that. Seems too small for her.
>>16993478
>Popcorn ceiling?
The fuck are you on about?
>>16996255
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popcorn_ceiling
>>16993429
Well to be fair, she is classed as a plus sized model, implying she is fat and needs to lose weight, when she clearly isn't.
>>16987248
please be an uncensored version of this somewhere
>>16998112
>implying she is fat and needs to lose weight
Not necessarily. The term is relative to the average of the industry. Most people have much more body fat/muscle and proportions which deviate from Western models.
>>16998112
While that's true, she's a beautiful exception, not the rule. Most plus sized models don't look anything like her. Stefania herself is gorgeous enough that she'd be getting work no matter what she's classified as.
The plus size designation applies to anybody who doesn't fit into the classical waifish model type. It makes no distinction between people like Stefania and blobs like Tess Holliday. The thing is, the #droptheplus advocacy doesn't come across as getting rid of a largely useless term, but as a softer and no less misguided HAES movement.
It's stupid that healthy fit models like Stef get labeled the same as the fatties, not that the fatties get labeled differently than people who aren't obese.
>>16999026
>doesn't come across
So what is she supposed to do if she wants to get rid of the useless term grouping her with fatties?
>>16989337
Are those rain gutter pipes on those buildings?
>>16999104
redefine the term.
Any dancing or stripping videos?
I can't fap to pics anymore unless reasons.
>>16999654
I can't fap to pictures either. This thread is just as appreciation.
>>16999654
It isn't about the fapping, my brother. I find it difficult to fap to such perfection in the first place (though I could) - it's about seeing as many pictures as possible and marveling at the beauty of it.
>>17000235
>>17000296
Pretty much. There aren't often people with so many positive traits combined.
>>17000296
Why not do both? Works for me.
Wish there were more shots of her snatch
>>16994362
She's not even close
>>17000978
Whatever floats your boat. There are some people so transcendingly beautiful, just being able to look at them becomes an almost religious experience and fapping doesn't even enter my mind.
>>17001186
I was at work once when I saw someone like that. I started crying (not bitch faced, it was only tears for some reason) and spoke gibberish to them before promptly hiding in shame.
They were a physical incarnation of quintessential beauty.
>>17001159
Are there any at all?
(Uncensored of course)
>>17001291
Not that anon, but I have a few.
>>17002497
Thanks for posting those, anon.
>>17004678
>tfw you will never marry her
I don't want to live on this planet
>>16994295
Type of ceilings in some homes made between the 60s n 80s, aka stucco ceiling or more accurately an acoustic ceiling, went out of favor after the ban on asbestos, which it often contained.
>>17000296
already fapped still lurking cause A S T H E T I C
>>16987303
GET ON THE PAYLOAD
>>16989585
She looks like every other female on the planet, maybe she wanted to stand out.
Idiot.
>>17001193
vampires.
its how they lure their victims.
>>17007697
More like thralls than vampires.
The blood gives them power.
A select handful might be angels, but they generally disguise themselves as little old ladies, not sex goddesses.
>>17007705
I'm not crazy.
Shit exists yo.
And I'm not the only one who believes it. I met an old man, I should have trusted him, but I could see it in his eyes, he believed also.
I just couldn't confide in him. We had religious differences.
>>17007719
I told him I wanted to learn foriegn langauges, and he told me langauge was a tool of the vampires. He told my of the fall of babylon and how after the tower fell god cursed men to speak different languages so that when men from different lands would talk to each other they would only hear "babel".
>>17007727
They act as though they are benigh, they are the bringers of civilization, but the truth is they have broken mans spirit, turned him into a herd of blood cattle.
Civilization broke our backs.
But I just couldn't tell Larry that. I saw the look in his eyes. I knew that if I told him everything we had ever built was based on a lie he'd crack.
And for what its worth, civilization does have some good things in it. Good things, and good people.
>>17007732
If you hadn't been circumcised under their auspices, you would not have the lust, anger, and penchant for war so inherent in modern man.
You would not be such a slave to beauty.
>>17007741
If a beautiful woman seeks to arouse men only to deny them, is that not wicked? Unless she intends to share her body with every man who asks it of her, asking nothing in return, is that not prurient? And if a woman should do so, then what man would want her, outside of the wretches who line up at her door? Is not exclusivity the means by which a woman selects and attracts a mate?
How can we see the modern trend towards infidelity as anything but a sin when it leaves so many forlorn lovers in its wake, so many desperate hopefuls, so many sad and lonely hearts?
>>17007752
Look, Rabbi; you're using the wrong head here.
She has purple pubes.
Just let that sink in for a minute.
OK, clearly, this is a sign from Jesus that you need to lighten up and enjoy life a little...or let others do so in your absence.
T H I C C
oh shit none of these girls are really muscley save that last one
>>17007697
>>17007705
I only wanted to share a strange story of beauty. Y'all gonna make me terrified of each one I see.
Oh my she is gorgeous
>>16993478
>my cockhead chafed against my popcorn ceiling
oddly specific....
jesus christ id go to jail for her. THAT THIIIIIIIICCCCCCCC NESSSS
>>16987336
you mean she's perfect
>>17005796
Would you be her cuck?
>>17010224
I'm not sucking dick unless I get paid money.
>>17007850
S H O O P E D
>>17010489
I may be mistaken, though I thought the bare minimum for cuck was her fucking someone else with the title partner potentially (but not always) getting off to it. Not sure what you're on about.
Like this.
Any moar?
>>17010224
No, Why would I share her with anyone else? I fucking hate you dumb cuck posters.
>>17007585
>Idiot.
Whoa, whoa sorry to 'insult' your 'girlfriend' there buddy.
>>17007752
>How can we see the modern trend towards infidelity
Good I guess? Men still get what they want; pussy. But as far as marrying? No, no thanks. Not anymore.
>>16991499
She makes a living by being objectified but also complains about body issues and fat shaming and objectification. Shes in a documentary called embrace where she says she had depression wahh wahh etc due to body issues.
Too bad shes a man hating dyke.
>>17010873
>Calls others dumb
>Ignores the premise
The initial statement is anon not wanting to be on this planet if he could not marry Stefania. It is a given she is out of our collective league and marrying doesn't guarantee sexual access to her, or even her company. However, I wanted to know if that anon would still marry her if he was guaranteed no sexual access.
>>17011024
I donno, doesn't stop me from appreciating her physical. Never going to interact with her either, so I don't give a hoot.
>>17011023
she's technically the perfect person and if anyone called her fat she has every right to be upset, that's a crime.
>>17009342
>unironically using the THICC bullshit
Is it so hard to just reach over and hit the K key like someone who isn't retarded?
>>17012619
>However, I wanted to know if that anon would still marry her if he was guaranteed no sexual access.
That's a stupidly specific question anon. For the vast overwhelming majority of humanity the idea of pair bonding and the institutions that come with it mean sexual access and often monogamous access.
Why would you need to ask the question, if he would still marry her without sexual intimacy, if you weren't doing exactly what >>17010873 suggested?
And if you weren't, why would you expect >>17005796 to settle for a hypothetical marriage without physical intimacy, something "marry," already implies without further elaboration for virtually everyone?
>>17014221
Ironically, you've already answered the questions you pose in your dissertation.
Also, physical intimacy isn't limited to sex.
Reminds of an ex-grlfriend
>>17007585
>She looks like every other female on the planet
I fucking wish
>>17017275
The problem here is you're picking apart words when the argument is obvious. That post even used "sexual intimacy," to refer to the same thing which should eliminate confusion.
This is a thread dedicated to admiring her physical body where most of the content features nudity. Anyone saying they want to marry her in this context obviously means that union to include being sexual. This simple concept only needs nuanced explanations for annoying cuckolds. Judging by your post here >>17012619, that label seems to apply since for most people the idea of marriage not including sex or even company is an absurdity.
That or you were being painfully literal (again) and picking apart >>17005796's words when he likely used marry as a succinct label for a stable and committed long-term monogamous pairing and not the formal legal status.
>>17019551
It is obvious, yet it ignores its own premise which is coincidently the original question.