This is probably my favorite porn image of all time.
It love the girl's expression.
I love how dominant she is.
I love the guy's butt.
But I think what I really like about this pic more than anything else is that it's "femdom" taken to the absolute max of realism. The problem with femdom fetishes based on male behavior patterns is women don't act like that and the porn stars aren't good at acting. So they're just really disappointing.
This image has stayed with me over the years whereas the others have failed because it reflects a form of femdom that actually exists: namely, female assertiveness. Women will simply never be into ballbusting or sissy hypnosis for real. but this kind of domination, the idea of female pursuer, female aggressor, really does exist, as I've experienced it myself.
The woman's facial expression (discrete but lustful) and the man's body language (totally passive, 'standing at attention'), reveal a domination as thorough as any ballbusting retardation. In fact, moreso, because she's not using any weapons. In light of this I'm not even sure what the appeal of sadism is. You can control and influence people without hurting them, what does the violence add to the fetish? To me it only detracts; if you require whips and chains to dominate, your 'domination' obviously does not have much psychological force.
Good read, but I don't have anything to say.
>>39637627
Interesting observation and pinpointing the fetish.
However, I don't like looking at men's asses, so please post something similar, yet without a man's ass.
>>39638093
>I don't like looking at men's asses
Are you some kind of faggot?
Hot athletic girl in junior high used to slap and squeeze my butt in the hall, and hit on me aggressively, Me a blushing boy shied away.
>>39637627
I think ur just a homo desu.
>>39638113
How do you get an ass that nice? Like the indents on the sides?
just flex
>>39638128
girls used to grab my ass in high school too. Recently I got told I have a bubble butt.
>>39638137
He's flexing his glutes. If you are lean and have a good amount of muscle that's what it looks like
Can't remember what started the conversation, but the girl said in front of whole class that she likes me because of my ass.
>>39638230
Chicks like men's asses I've had like 30 women total grab it, slap or it just say "you have a sexy ass." I don't think I've had even one sexual encounter with women that has gone without mentioning the ass--it's literally always their favorite thing about me.
Don't listen to any stereotypes about sexuality. You know that saying "sterotypes always have a kernal of truth"? That's probably valid about ehtnic groups and shit but it's not true at all about peoples' sexual desires. Just talk to women man, they're not like the psych books say, at least not all the time. Many women are plenty assertive, I've always found dom chicks to date me and I"m not talking paid ones.
>>39638158
qt girl (male)
>>39638406
This post is correct about everything
Lots of girls are assertive and I think that quality really relates to their confidence levels
I used to be full autism, and the women I pursued were always passive and insecure
My autism has to an extent diminished over the years and now I find that women who are less insecure are also less passive and will often be assertive when comfortable
>>39637627
I dunno man. I would say there's an element of irony in this kind of female domination.
Its dominant behaviour, but it is being directed towards someone who is more naturally dominant than the woman (darker skin tone, muscular build). The implication of the image is not a subversion of male dominance, but a cultural state where women are more free to go out and get what they want. However 'what they want' continues to be dominant men.
So you have hypergamy, where the advantage of dominant men is accelerated, not checked, by the growing tendency towards dominant behaviour in women. Indeed, the more dominant these women become the fewer number of men are sufficiently scary/physically-impressive/aggressive etc to make these women feel feminine and therefore to elicit their maximum sexual excitement.
You may love how dominant she is, but unless she is aging and you are young, or you are rich or some sort of specific outlier like that, then its a dominant apeman Chad she is looking out for, and not you (assuming you lean more towards robot than Chad).
Sorry to sound so negative.
>Women will simply never be into ballbusting or sissy hypnosis for real.
Are you sure of that? I remember one guy from Canada telling me he'd known several girls who wanted to squeeze his balls. He was a popular Chad type and I can accept his testimony.
There are also certainly girls who like dressing boys up as girls and playing games involving gender reversal and so on, I'm pretty sure feminization fantasies are often based on experiences boys have had with that behaviour in women.
I personally had a girl who loved making me jealous and admitted as much. She would say outrageous things to basically cuckold me and she genuinely got off on it.
>>39638406
>i've always found girls to date me
either you're lying or you probably shouldn't be here
>>39638696
>The implication of the image is not a subversion of male dominance
Eh I wasn't really reading a cultural critique into it at all. I'm just reading pure 'what's being depicted here based on clear things like body language and facial expressions.' I think reading cultural 'message' into these things is basically playing the lottery. I mean yes, there might be some Freudian insight you can fish out of sea, but it's one of just a handful in a pool full of nothingness.
>>39639022
Right, but your original interpretation of the image does carry with it assumptions about what is being said about the subject matter. You can't escape that.
That's like saying that the statue in pic related isn;t saying anything about japan because its not 'physically' depicting them.
A woman sexually objectifying and dominating a man is a statement, just like visa versa.
The interpretation you took, that it points to an existing form of female assertiveness, might well be true. But it is not the most OBVIOUS or DIRECT interpretation in a world where the equalisation of male and female power in social circumstances is a matter of cultural preoccupation.
Nor does the question of interpretation really affect my main point: If women are more 'dominant' these days, it simply means they feel more free to go out and get what they want (at least what they want in the short term).
Only problem is that this happens to be animalistically dominant men, brutes, and its bad for society in general and certainly for r9k types that this is the apparent endgame of sexual liberation.
>>39638137
Eat: oats
Do: squats
I love guys and girls butts. Just wanna fuck em all