Are women superior to men?
They are superior to me atleast.
They aren't, but society allows them much power to live superior lives to most men.
They're definitely nicer than men.
>>39613544
There is only one thing in which women are superior than men.
Social intelligence
Doesn't matter how good you think you are as a man, socially women are always better. The sad part is instead of using that advantage to help other people they use it to manipulate people for their goals
>>39613544
Pretty much in a naturalistic sense. They evolved slightly to manipulate men, obliviously because they're more violent and risky.
But as women freely pick the best genes we'll soon all look neoteny like Asians, because women like genetically superior men who look non-threatening enough to cuddle and show off to their girlfriends..
>>39613859
Wrong
>>39613612
Definitely wouldn't mind if this happened to me.
>>39613544
In intellect they are, since went from the bottom of the social hierarchy 100 years ago to the top now.
>>39614130
>In intellect they are, since went from the bottom of the social hierarchy 100 years ago to the top now
Leaving be how they're not actually at the top of the hierarchy, by reversing your argument we can also say they've been at the bottom for the rest of the tens of thousands of years and I don't see how that makes them more intelligent than men.
>>39613859
You shouldn't judge 3d women off your experience in animu.
>>39614240
In modern culture men fucking worship women are you retarded.
>>39613544
Only Catgirls are superior to men.
>>39613544
absolutely not, but as men we're allowing women to triumph over us with no reason. It's those "chivarly" beta fags who don't realize escorts and onaholes exist.
not really
but man can't exist without them
>>39614392
God is a woman. Nature is the goddess that rules this entire planet. Think about it. Who is in control of the means of reproduction?
>>39613544
They're a lot prettier than we are. Also, they're much more useful biologically, since they produce life and all that.
>>39614478
That goes both ways though. You take a group of 1000 women, put them in a cage, wait 100 years, there will be no humans left. Add a man to the equation, you're going to have a few thousand humans. But of course, a situation with few men and lots of women is more beneficial when it comes to population growth and survival of the species so for that reason I think you could argue that women are "better".
>a society with 10 men and 100 women=peace and dramatic expansion, at least initially
>a society with 100 men and 10 women=total fucking anarchy
>>39613859
>They're definitely nicer than men.
>women
>Nicer than men
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Ive only met a handful of women that were nice 100% of the time to any and everybody. I'd estimate a good 95% of women are complete bitches if you aren't a chad/chang/tyrone
>>39614589
men are . Men own women. A woman can't rape a man and disappear while he gestates and births a child.
look at how much women freak out over sex bots. they know artificial wombs are next. Imagine if you could raise a child of your own genes, or just a clone of yourself.
>>39615209
>Men own women
That's what they want you to think.
My only friends have been females. I hate being around other guys because it's always a competition between to be on top of the social hierarchy. It's annoying, can't they just chill?
>>39613859
They generally are. But as many a robot already knows from experience, niceness doesn't necessarily have much weight or run deeper than the surface. Especially for women, a lot of their niceness is superficial.