>let's say you live in a rather large city of 1 million
>50% of those are women, giving us 500,000 potential partners
>In an average first world country maybe 15% of those are in your age group, which leaves us with 75,000
>very conservative estimate is that 5% or 3750 of them are neither, fat, feminists, whores, nor any combination of the three
>rough estimate 20% of them will be at least a 7/10, narrowing it down to 750 eligible mates
>roughly half, or 325 of them will be single
>going by tinder data, a male of median attractiveness will have a 0,84% chance of being ''liked'' by any given girl
>assuming tinder sluts are 10x as picky as these girls, that still leaves 63 women
>2 of these will be lesbians
What are your chances of meeting one of them?
>say you approach or ask out one woman in your age group every week for 10 years
>75,000/3640=144~, meaning it's less than a 1% chance
>not accounting for different schedules, living in different areas and so on, since cycling through all eligible girls in a methodical manner is not very likely
>even if you do get a gf, it's a 50% chance you'll divorce, meaning she wasn't your soulmate in the end after all
>this all entails you talking to more girls in a month than you've probably talked to your entire life
Good luck.
This is bullshit. Just go outside and talk to girls instead of rationalizing why you can't ever get a GF with this shitty defeatist attitude.
>>39608246
What's the chance without factoring in them needing to be 7/10
Shit, fucked up the last bit. Still, 61 women in a city of 1,000,000, and at best you might approach less than 1% of the girls in your age group, and only 0.084% of all 75,000 would fit all of the criteria above. The numbers don't lie.
>>39608246
ah yes, because only people who live in my city come to my city
or that i'm not statistically more likely to hang out with people closer to my age group than people much older or much younger than me
>>39608301
Assuming 20% of them are 7/10, your chances would be 5x as good. Meaning there are 305 girls who fit the criteria I've set up. Still, that would include all the ugly girls too.
>>39608246
>"Here's why finding the perfect person is statistically improbable"
>implies any gf is perfect
Just wing it, dumbass. Nobody will fit all your criteria. Just find someone attractive and see if you click.
>>39608342
>or that i'm not statistically more likely to hang out with people closer to my age group than people much older or much younger than me
Read again. That was factored into the equation.
>>39608356
That gives me at least a small shred of hope, which is one shred more than I already had
>>39608362
Yes, a girl who is your age and single, but not fat, feminist, ugly, or a whore. Truly unreasonable standards.
>>39608415
Ugly is pushing it, but the rest is reasonable imo
>>39608246
75,000 in my age group, fine.
>95% of them are either fat, feminists, or whores.
nah
>80% of the decent ones are gf material
nah
>half single
I'd lean more towards 70% single (for my particular age group in my particular area, say)
>1% chance of being liked
lmao this is bullshit.
>>39608387
>>39608325
>>39608246
Her Asian boyfriend. Although they might have broken up but she prefers Asian guys anyways, so her next guy will be Asian
>>39608387
>Read again. That was factored into the equation.
no, it wasn't
>>39608437
>nah
Do you live in Eastern Europe?
>lmao this is bullshit
Bruv, read again, I said 10%. Shiet, say 70%, your chances are still pretty small.
>>39608469
>>say you approach or ask out one woman in your age group every week for 10 years
>>39608497
the OP pointed out that x number of people are in my age group, but didn't factor in that people are far more likely to hang out with people in their own age group
i.e. even though 15% of the eligible population are within my age group, there's more than a 15% chance that the people i know and are friends with are within that age group
>>39608544
I did. You'd ask out 3640 girls in your age group, or 1/144.
>>39608544
>>39608764
sry mate, I saw where my math was wrong now. It'd be more like 1/20. Still though.
>>39608415
Anyone talking like this would consider anything less than perfection as "ugly".
>Your age and single
stupidly common. Not to mention that relationships are in contstant flux, so a girl who is dating today could be single tomorrow, or the next day, etc. Options open and close constantly.
>>39608811
>Anyone talking like this would consider anything less than perfection as "ugly".
Are you new here? but 7/10 isn't perfection lol
>using math to validate your bitterness and laziness
That's why -you- won't get a gf. Funny how people beat your odds every day, huh?
>>39608246
Adjusted for my area and opinion:
> city of 1 million
> 500,000 women
> 75,000 in my age group
> 20 % are feminists, whores or obese (eastern europe anon) - 60,000
> I'd be attracted to 80 % of that portion (r9k...) - 48,000
> half of them are single: 24,000
> chance of me being liked by a girl: 0,00001%
> that leaves 0.0024 of a woman
assuming I ask one per day for 10 years:
>75,000/0.0024 = 31,250,000 (meaning it's 414% chance)
Wait am I a Chad???.... dafug
>>39608246
Here senpai, some more fun for you