How are normies able to not care about a girl's sexual past?

They are just as degenerate

also desperate

They do care, they're simply in denial if they say otherwise. Most of them just try to forget about it because as disgusting as it is, normalfags simply can't handle being alone.

File: 1503852153601.jpg (55KB, 632x699px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 632x699px

When I asked my normie friend he said he doesn't care and it's just a part of life. I wish I'd didn't cared otherwise I'd probably would have a gf by now.

It fucking disgust me the thought of kissing a woman when her lips were probably on another dudes dick in the past.

>>39473616
The majority care. It's just the "sex positive" feminists and numales on reddit who don't care.

They're not as strict about it as robots, your average man doesn't care if his gf has had a handful of boyfriends in the past because he's probably had a handful of gfs, but it starts to get tricky when she's fucking guys for car club t shirts (I know a girl who did this) or gets a little alcohol in her and unzips her pants and lets guys finger her at a party (I've seen this) or she's at the club every other weekend, having one night stands whenever possible.

1. Don't think about it Morty
2. Sleep around yourself so doesn't seem as gross in comparison
3. Seriously don't think about it.

If you meet a girl and she keeps talking about her exes tell her to shut the fuck up. If she won't shut up about it, dump her and move on.

File: 1501455501654.png (179KB, 508x494px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 508x494px

>>39473936
>or gets a little alcohol in her and unzips her pants and lets guys finger her at a party (I've seen this)

did you get in on that?

>>39473616
They care about your lack of sexual past

>>39473616
well I hang around chads and they don't care because they are not settling with her. chad only wants to have a good time and they just dump them. after turning most girls in to sloppy seconds they shame betas for not marring their disgusting leftovers.

Beyond pregnancies and STIs it doesn't matter.
You faggots are just insecure because you are virgins and spend all day poisoning your minds on a board filled with butthurt losers.

File: 1497653689503.png (349KB, 757x632px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 757x632px

>>39474016
>i hang around chads
>hang around
the amount of normie shit in this board has reached peak levels

File: db280_fig3.png (153KB, 960x721px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 960x721px

Totally normal brah

File: oregon-shooter.jpg (38KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 640x360px

>>39474109
This board turned normie ever since the faggot in pic related got this place on mentioned on the news.

>>39474163
>implying that's not how you found out about this board too

>>39474109
trust me I am not a normie still a kv and never had a gf but I can make friends with males because I put my dominance instinct aside.

Because for a normal the worst case scenario is no sex.

A 500lb woman smeared in her own shit and infected with hiv is better than no woman at all to a normalfag.

>>39473616
Because they can't think long term they're just thinking hey I get laid and I'm not alone

>>39473616
this is a prostitute

>>39474317
Prostitute today, wife tomorrow.

>>39473616
It takes more energy to care about something than it does to not.

File: 2017-07-22-18.44.jpg (93KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 540x960px

When she tells me I'm better than all 5 of her exes who clearly had no idea what they were doing and had no idea how to channel their inner perversion.

>>39473616
The more important question is why would you even care? If you have a problem with it then that's not their issue, it's yours.

Poeple have sex, deal with it.

File: milhouse.png (118KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 300x300px

>not feeling entitled to anyone's virginity
>being confident enough in yourself that it isn't even a question whether or not you're the best she's had
>having sex with enough women that it balances out/doesn't matter to either of you
>wearing a condom so you don't get STDs
basically they aren't pussywhipped BEFORE they have sex with a girl, a lot of the times not after, either, which is probably an alien concept to you nerds

>>39473616
The truth is most men do care about women's pasts, It's just beta cucks on the internet that don't care.

Most women have slept with 3-4 men per decade once they become sexually active, what you see on the internet is nowhere near reality.

>>39474598
> The truth is most men do care about women's pasts, It's just beta cucks on the internet that don't care.

Surely you mean the other way around? Only beta's care.

>>39474425
you're not very bright are you?

she says that to everyone she fucks

>>39474049
>t. proud cuckold

>>39474442
This desu desu


Oregano comentariues

>>39474645
You're mistaking losers who fuck a bunch of trashy sluts while working a low paying jobs and party all the time for alphas.

Men care how many people their long term relationship have been with, the don't care about the number for the slut they are fucking.

>>39474598
As socio-economic status increases the number of partners decreases.

>>39473616
>How are normies able to not care about a girl's sexual past?
Because normies lost their virginities in their teens, likely to anothet virgin, and have had sex with multiple partners up to that point. Therefore because they've had multiple partners they don't care that the woman has multiple partners.

File: IMG_7410.jpg (14KB, 128x250px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 128x250px

>>39473616
It's not a normie thing, even robots have this some debate about wether or not a girl being a virgin when you date her should matter. Also the answer is no it shouldn't matter. Relationships come and go, it's the very nature of them. Some last longer than others, and sex is bound to happen most of the time. So if you're dating a girl who's had boy friends in the past she most likely isn't a virgin. That shouldn't be a problem because she has not dumped those guys and is devoted to you. That's all that matters.
>But her pussy has been soiled
Sounds like a you problem, I'm assuming you also hate when your food touches you pansy faggot.

>>39473720
No, when you've been with girls, you don't care, because you did things, she did things, both of you lived your life. Why would you care? ofc unless she's been fucking your neighbors and everybody knows she's some whore then yeah, but otherwise it doesn't matter and nobody is in denial.

>>39474956
Correction, meant to say she has NOW dumped those guys, not NOT.

>>39473616
Because men also have a sexual past. My current girlfriend had only had sex once before meeting me. I have slept with a bunch of girls. It'd be hypocritical for me to be angry about her when I've done the same thing but more than her.

>>39474956
Personally I wouldn't care much about the number, unless the number is so big it makes you wonder why she went through so many relationships.

Sex outside relationships instead is an instant dealbreaker because I do not do it and if a girl did she's clearly not compatible with my values.

>>39474956
>She is done riding her chad boyfriends and is ready to settle down with a financially stable beta orbiter.

>>39474956
>Sounds like a you problem, I'm assuming you also hate when your food touches you pansy faggot.
Bad comparison. Would you like to eat stuff that someone else has slobbered all over? I bet not. That's not to say your post was wrong.

>>39473616
Good self esteem makes them care less about possible comparison being made.

Pretend not to care, but when they bring up their exs or things I feel sick.

>TFW girl I was seeing didn't give her head because she use to on her ex and didn't like it.

>>39475028
Yeah, but this kind of thinking requires you to have empathy for women and consider them people which is congenitally impossible for most robots.

Because they only care about her sexual present (i.e., that she's fucking him and not someone else). Betas look nervously back, Chads look confidently forward.

>>39475028
>>39475092
Men of taste
>>39475075
Projecting Faggot

>>39473616
they don't feel the need to have a pure virgin waitfu because they live in the real world, where they probably also did crazy shit in the past

>>39474956
>this fucking delusional
we get it, you're a normie

>>39474425
holy kek you believed her?

>>39475179
Not an argument my good man

File: the so called, master race.jpg (79KB, 960x620px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 960x620px

I am not a small dicked cuckold so I do not feel threatened by the other guy, unlike the average cumskin from /r9k/

>>39473795
Iktf too well friendo

>>39475075
do u see yourself as a beta orbiter? chances are youll be treated like one, i dont think i need to tell you but never breed

File: 1489026914050.gif (564KB, 800x430px) Image search: [Google]

564KB, 800x430px

>>39473795
>I'd didn't cared
>I had did not cared
That's a lot of past tense.

File: Heritage[1].jpg (47KB, 633x360px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 633x360px

>>39475222
here's your argument, my good man
now fuck off kike

>>39473616
Most girls have degenerate sexual pasts. Virgin girls don't exist unless they're devoutly religious and they'll all end up with charismatic pastor Chads anyway.

Because mine was worse.

>>39474956
>>But her pussy has been soiled
>Sounds like a you problem, I'm assuming you also hate when your food touches you pansy faggot.
No, I hate when my food touches somebody else's food before mine
if irony was a horse, you would be paul fucking revere faggot

Question for all you permavirgins: you are so fixated on getting a virgin gf, but how would you know? How would you know she is a virgin and not just lying to you because she knows you're an insecure faggot?

>>39475472
>she doesn't act like a roastie
>she tells me before I ask her

They obviously do, you can tell by how angry it makes them when they see these threads

>>39475337
Not a kike and not an argument you fool.
Take note everyone, I'm about to use his own argument against word. Key word, MORE marital partners, doesn't say none or in your case virgin. As another anon stated in this post, it really depends on how many guys she dated. If she's dated like 100 guys I can see where your coming from, but several is completely fine.

Moreover, anyone who knows anything about social science knows to take statistics with a grain of salt. Statistics only show correlation and not causation. So if you were showing me this to covince me that if a women had dated plenty of guys in the past you're guaranteed to have an unsuccessful relationship, you've failed miserably.

>>39474956
>comparing food touching to getting fucked

It's more like the food on my plate was in someone else's mouth and they spit it out and people expect you to put it in your mouth because
>it's only been in 3 other mouths! What are you a germaphobe?

Germaphobe meaning gay

>>39473616
Literally out of sight out of mind, as long a girl doesn't talk to or see any guy she has fucked then its like it didn't even happen. So if a woman had fucked her friend or even their friend it becomes tainted.

>>39475590
Girls do take showers and wash their vaginas. You literally cannot tell if she had sex with someone just a few hours before. You'd know this if you had ever seen a vagina in real life.

>>39475518
>she has had sex with 10 men but doesn't act like a roastie
>she lies to you about being a virgin because she knows you're an insecure faggot

You'd never know.

>>39475590
>What is a shower
You are amazingly stupid

>>39474425

let me guess youre the only one who ever made her cum and she's never even been spanked before you right lmao gullible

By telling themselves it's not that big of a deal and they can't go back in time and unfugg those dudes. If you eliminate every woman with a sexual past it limits your dating pool so you may end up with nothing. Right? What a cuckolded mindset to be in. Maybe I am just describing myself. I don't know.

File: IMG_0063.jpg (127KB, 695x779px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 695x779px

Because they're not insecure faggots who are scared that they'll never live up to her ex.

Robots want kissless virgins so that she has nothing to compare them to

>>39475560
>Statistics only show correlation and not causation
you deduct the causation from what you know happens in real life. in this case - women being roasties
that's non-marital zero sexual partners, which translates to virginity
>>39475650
>she has had sex with 10 men but doesn't act like a roastie
she doesn't act, she is the roastie
>she lies to you about being a virgin because she knows you're an insecure faggot
i wouldn't ask if i weren't sure she isn't virgin, but it would also depend on her commitment to you

File: 1499918374400.jpg (41KB, 455x500px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 455x500px

>>39474163
>>39474242
I'm unironically leaving this website forever after reading this

Enjoy your board, normites.

>>39475638
>he has a valid point
>better try to insult him by saying he never gets whore pussy

That one really got me bud.

>>39475651
>a mans semen doesn't linger in a females body for the rest of her life fucking up her future offspring because of too many diffrent genes

http://www.medicaldaily.com/dna-sperm-ex-partners-lingers-female-flies-and-influences-genetics-her-offspring-305934

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegony_(pregnancy)

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/10/141001090238.htm

>but Stacy said her body count doesn't matter

You're right! You're beta male genes will be surpassed by all the chads she's fucked before (^;

>>39475843
>There is no evidence of such effects in humans
Literally the first link you posted. But I guess you just want to ragepost your bitter virgin copypasta instead of actually providing facts? It's a good thing that someone of such low intellect as you will never breed.

>>39474425
>"so satisfied with your performance"
please tell me that's just an escort

>>39475843
>suggest
>might
Lmao none of your articles are any more "factual" than a fucking fairy tale. It's all speculation. Plenty of people's parents have had partners in the past and their kids came out fine, but you're going to let this small chance that isn't even confirmed stop you? Your kids are also likely to get autism and other diseases too, but of course you don't give a shit about that because it isn't sexual.

>>39474109
Nice Pepe, mind if I save it?

oreganooooo

>>39473616
because they have a sexual past too

>>39475785
>you deduct the causation from what you know happens in real life
>from what you know happens in real life
Literally the most vague and incorrect thing said in this thread so far. With your logic, big foot exist because we see giant as foot prints in the ground that we KNOW happened in real life, so big foots gotta be the cause. Like I said, statistics show correlation and not causation. What your static fails to show is the plenty of other reasons why people's marriages fail (such as financial, and shit like that). Why should a small statistic speak for every women on the planet ?Its also outdated by almost 10 years and doesn't even show how many people participated in the survey, of factors about them that could've contributed to an unsuccessful marriage.
I said it before and I'll say it again. Not a fucking argument.

>>39475952
1000 years ago we though the earth was flat?
>What's your point?

>>39475843
>First link uses words like suggest, might, words associated with things that aren't confirmed to be factual
>Second link is a fucking theory
>Third link pertains to bugs

Literally none of these are arguments, did you even fucking read them? Or did you just search up "articles about past male partners genes affecting new partners genes" and pick the first 3 results. I'm assuming you did the latter. The odds of that happening are slim to none, and if it was higher you'd see it happening more frequently which it doesn't. Your kid will be fine and will come out looking like you, none of your articles refuted that with any unfalsifiable facts.

File: 1499010376115.gif (968KB, 227x221px) Image search: [Google]

968KB, 227x221px

>>39474425
>so far
uh oh

>>39475952
>I obviously didn't read all the articles the response

Let's do a quick mental exercise try to keep up

>all skulls of ancient people have perfect teeth
How's this possible when braces hadn't been invented for 1000s later, but now in the modern age even when we're the most advanced we've ever been we have the most health defects we've ever had. How come the more comfortable we as humans become the more mental illnesses, and diseases we get?

We're animals like everything else here. Ask any farmer or dog breeder and they'll tell you a virgin animal will breed the best offspring. >>39476152

>>39476273
>big foot exist because we see giant as foot prints
if there were nothing but chickens in the world, then this assumption would be correct
>What your static fails to show is the plenty of other reasons why people's marriages fail (such as financial, and shit like that).
>i'm gonna divorce you cus you're a broke ass nigga
>i expect alimony
>Why should a small statistic speak for every women on the planet?
it shouldn't, but the majority is a majority for a reason
>doesn't even show how many people participated in the survey
enough women
>increasinglynervousman.jpg

>>39476399
>>39476152
>lmao smoking MIGHT cause lung cancers lmao
>lmao doing meth MIGHT kill you LMAO
>LMAO it's just a theory that MIGHT HAPPEN LMAO

Wohhhhhhh heyyyy calm down there big guy I don't mind what you turbo chads who sweat testorone think, go after a girl who's had 10+ sexual partners it won't fuck me over any. But I don't want to hear it when your mongoloid children think my beautiful children are body shaming yours by simply looking better

>>39476573
The difference between smoking and meth and this unconfirmed theory your claiming is we have an overwhelming amount of evidence that clearly shows a direct causation between smoking and lung cancer and meth and death. So much to the point that we can claim with absolute certainty that those statements are factual. Look at the amount of people's parents who've had pasts with other people and come out looking exactly like their birth right parents. The odds of that happening are literally slim to none. None of it's confirmed, you don't have nearly the same certainty with smoking and meth with what your claiming and you're delusional if you believe so.
>ut I don't want to hear it when your mongoloid children think my beautiful children are body shaming yours by simply looking better
Nice projection, my children will be just fine. If your children come out looking like shit it's because YOU have shit genes and shitty aesthetics. Not some unconfirmed pseudo bull shit chance of some other dudes sperm fucking them up. There's plenty of people who are the result of their parents being full virgins and come out looking like shit. Why? Because their parents looked like shit.

because they aren't pathetic shutins insecure about their dicklets

>>39473616
perhaps because many of them are either degenerate or stupid fucks? seriously, i've seen more than a couple of times dudes getting into serious shit for not knowing who the hell those bitches have been with (from getting aids to getting dragged into a fight because yes oh yes she didn't break up with the last boy and got utterly rekt). Nowadays dudes have to take caution

>>39473616
Because they get to be their sexual present, unlike robots.

>>39476493
>if there were nothing but chickens in the world, then this assumption would be correct
Clearly missed the point of my analogy. You claimed that causation is derived from things that happen in the real world. While you're partially right, it isn't that simple. In the example of Bigfoot, yes, you have something happening in the real worth (i.e. The foot print) and alleged causes (big foot, or the obvious cause, a hoax). The question is how do we find the true cause? By ivestigation and considering all the factors, something your statistic fails to do, rendering it a shitty example and not an argument.
>i'm gonna divorce you cus you're a broke ass nigga
>i expect alimony
Was this your half asses attempted at projecting ? That's actually a legitiment reason why some people get divorced, and it happens with both women who were virgins and non virgs. So thank you for proving my point.
>it shouldn't, but the majority is a majority for a reason
Wrong. Your first answer was right, it shouldn't. Because you haven't considered all other factors in these participants lives that's could've contributed to their divorce.
>enough women
In other words, you don't know how many people participated in the survey. Could've been a couple hundred for all you know, which accounts for like what, an extremely small number of the population? Not to mention the fact that countless other factors weren't even considered, and outliers.

>>39473616
Because normies have had sex before. Only virgins with little to no chance of ever scoring actively care about a women's sexual past. In the normal world, where people are normal, the normal thought process is that both parties have had sex before, so it's best just to not be concerned about it, unless stuff like STIs are involved.

>>39476911
>>i've seen more than a couple of times

lol, how do you see anything when you don't even have a job or go outside? keep making up stories haha

File: anatomy & risks.gif (2MB, 2048x3072px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x3072px

>>39473616
> How are normies able to not care about a girl's sexual past?
In this day and age, they would have to be ignorant idiots.

>>39474049
> Beyond pregnancies and STIs it doesn't matter.
It most certainly can matter, depending on what she did or allowed/endured. The images (two in an animated gif) are very much related.

>>39476866
Any sauce on that last claim? No? Oh that's weird. However the only reason there hasn't been a correlation with birth defects and past sexual partners is because we haven't looked for one. Garuntee you if you asked all mothers to fill out paperwork talking about their past sexual partners you'd see the effects in their offspring. It's the same as in ancient times when people would die randomly and you'd have no idea why. Only until you started testing for stuff did you get answers.

But this evidence is so damning and so revealing it will never make mainstream news and will be shrugged off as "angry virgins" trying to hurt he strong and independent female. And all you betas who not only defend this shitty behavior but defend it are only hurting your future prospects

File: IMG_1476.png (477KB, 800x834px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 800x834px

Abundance mentality

When you know you can bang as many girls as you want, loyalty becomes a lower priority

At least one of the dozens of women must have caught your sperm

Low SMV men are either very accepting to cuck levels (I.E. can't find a non-slut and settle as a beta provider)

Or they become enraged when cheated on, or learn she was a slut

When a girl seems like she won't be loyal I don't give a shit, I'm already banging 2 others who I can drop her for

>>39477032
>that's could've contributed to their divorce
>financial
>she leaves him to get with another dude
>roastie
>an extremely small number of the population
why do you think it matters? why do you think the results are so erratic that it cannot possibly reflect the fidelity of women?

>>39473616
Who is the guy on the bed?

>>39477180
>all X are the same

This argument is so shitty

>>39476451
>all skulls of ancient people have perfect teeth
Actually that's false, more people have perfect teeth today do to inventions of things like tooth paste, tooth brushes, mouth wash, and modern day dental studies.
>How come the more comfortable we as humans become the more mental illnesses, and diseases we get?
Have you ever opened a history book in your bloody life ? We actually have less diseases than we did back then. Think of shit like the Black Plague and stuff that we've gained immunity to now thanks to modern medicine.

>We're animals like everything else here.
Agreed
>Ask any farmer or dog breeder and they'll tell you a virgin animal will breed the best offspring.
Wrong, you get the best offspring by breeding the the healthiest animals with the strongest genes, regardless of their sexual past you uneducated bellend.

>>39473993
No unfortunately. But I did see the guy take her to a back room afterward and presumably finish the job.

File: 1482034604697.jpg (68KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 480x270px

>>39473616
A girls sexual past doesn't matter if you're only DATING her, you're just getting your turn on the town bike desu. If you're MARRYING a girl for breeding purposes thats completely different and there sexual past is a serious issue. I mean, c'mon, you want your children coming out of a vagina that's had any dick in it other than yours?

>>39477217
He didn't say that, idiot

Ivy League universities have conclusively proven that impulsive people and lower IQ people are almost guaranteed to end up in jail or on welfare

Past behavior is the greatest indicator of future behavior

>>39477180
>Why does considering all the possible factors that contribute to the same conclusions that I'm claiming is the result of one factor matter
>Why can't the factor I'm arguing in favor for be the only factor so I can win this argument
So what your saying is you care more about being right and justifying your endeavor for a perfect virgin waifu that what's actually true? Interesting. I'm starting to think that everyone that restores to statistics on this website has never taken a highschool, or any statistic class in general in their fucking lives lmao.

because they only care about enjoying their time in a disgusting women womb pounded by well over 10 guys.

File: 1504326262176.png (312KB, 405x481px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 405x481px

>>39474425

>so far
Anon...

>all these fucking normal fags trying to justify picking off the table scarps chad left behind
fucking pathetic

>>39477100
.gif
nice faggot no need for no zoom.

File: 1504110111702.gif (18KB, 340x340px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 340x340px

>>39474956
Looks like a roastie got her flaps twisted up in a knot.

>>39477235
>ancient ppl have good teeth
>thats false
no links provided stoped reading here cuck.

>>39474425
Bitches say that to their current bf regardless....

You are not 14 anymore, come the fuck on.

>>39477449
Burden of proof lies on the positive assertion

>Dinosaurs had feathers
Requires a citation

>>39477118
>any sauce on that last claim
Are you actually so arrogant and confident that you unironically believe that EVERY SINGLE beautiful (by general societal standards) person with good facial aesthetics on this planet is the result of having a virgin mother. I'd like to see some evidence for that claim.
>However the only reason there hasn't been a correlation with birth defects and past sexual partners is because we haven't looked for one.
So you're a scientist now and you know everything that they have any haven't looked for. Did they also pay you to shill this garbage on these threads?
>Garuntee you if you asked all mothers to fill out paperwork talking about their past sexual partners you'd see the effects in their offspring.
I don't give a fuck about what you think. You can guarantee me anything you want it doesn't add one bit of credibility to your claim, infact if your so confident, get off your lazy arse and go do exactly that. Oh you won't? Of course not because you know you're full of shit.
>It's the same as in ancient times when people would die randomly and you'd have no idea why
Lack of modern day medicine, poisonous plants, poor hygiene, I could go on. Pick up a damn history book for heavens sake.
>But this evidence is so damning and so revealing it will never make mainstream news and will be shrugged off as "angry virgins" trying to hurt he strong and independent female. And all you betas who not only defend this shitty behavior but defend it are only hurting your future prospects
>This evidence is so revolutionary and it's soooo good but no one will listen to it. I know the secrets to life, they'll all see one day. They'll see...THEY'LL SEE!!!
No one listens to it because it's full of shit and had little to nothing supporting it to the point that we can claim that it's eaven plausible. For heavens sake one of your articles was regarding bugs.

>>39477235
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/11902097/Ancient-Romans-had-perfect-teeth-thanks-to-healthy-low-sugar-diet.html

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/ancient-romans-in-pompeii-had-nearly-perfect-teeth-180956859/

http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/02/24/172688806/ancient-chompers-were-healthier-than-ours

^please read

http://www.cheeseslave.com/ever-wonder-why-did-indigenous-people-had-straight-teeth/

You completely ignored what I said about mental diseases which were pretty much non existent back then

>and stuff
Wow you're a regular poin dexter


https://www.dogbreedinginformation.com/best-age-to-breed-a-dog/

https://books.google.com/books?id=nJc_AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA273&lpg=PA273&dq=farmers+breed+with+virgin+animals&source=bl&ots=-Fy_ujJp0t&sig=E_LrBzS152_Dz6J9kj7dTsdmkF0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-k9jxx4fWAhXk7IMKHSn5CFwQ6AEIaDAS#v=onepage&q=farmers%20breed%20with%20virgin%20animals&f=false

>Le I'm so smart because I get information from other people

Truly smart people get the answers on their own instead of just taking what they hear. Hopefully you're iq isn't passed onto your kids, hopefully that comes from a past sexual partner of your wife

File: IMG_1456.jpg (496KB, 732x1008px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 732x1008px

>>39477389
All women are scraps

You incels put them on a pedestal and wonder why you don't score

No girl will ever be "yours"

>>39473616
I don't like frigid prudes.
Also sauce?

>>39477310
we're talking about relationship desu not sex.
>all mens are pigs.
no roastie they just want a piece of your roaten flesh.

>>39477217
>accuses me of generalizing
>generalizes
>>39477321
you mentioned exactly one other factor other than virginity, that being financial, which can be debunked easily
if a woman leaves her husband in financial adversity that reflects her character
>what's actually true
what's actually true is that women need a tight leash and know nothing of honor or loyalty
that's why statistics are so great
they can be crystal clear but there will someone arguing, swearing to god that's not the actual cause of it

>>39477449
>needing a link for something that's taught in almost every highschool world history class
Get a load of this guy, can you imagine being this dumb? You must've been the guy choking his chicken during history lectures.
>>39477422
Nice projection faggot ;)

File: 1504095339868.jpg (205KB, 476x590px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 476x590px

>>39477505
spoted the cuck i m-must p-protect chad harem

I don't understand most robots.
You're all a bunch of sex craved creepers yet you hate sluts? They were made for you.
Good luck finding a sweet innocent normal girl who's going to indulge you in all of your weird fetishes.

File: you're next faggot.png (289KB, 690x314px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 690x314px

>>39477597
>taugh in class.
goooooood goy.
keep believing mr shekelstein.
pic related is you, saged for good measure.

>>39477589
The fact that it's a reflection of her character doesn't debunk shit dick head. All it suggest is that a women's character is a factor that could potentially lead to an unsuccessfully marriage, proving my point even further.
>that's why statistics are so great!
Great for showing correlations, not causation :^)

>>39477683
>i dont understand most robot
implying hes not a robot.

GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY BOARD REEEEEEEEEEE

>>39477716
>le all history books are Jewish conspired lies meme
>instead of listening to factual history books take my bull shit I pulled out of my ass from a website (which is much more likely to be Jewish conspired than a book) instead
Funny, but not an argument.
>>39477671
Nice projection faggot

>>39473616
I need sauce on that webm now please

>>39477734
if she has a shitty character, like most roasties tend to, she will value herself on what she can offer besides that, which is sex
>they can be crystal clear but there will someone arguing, swearing to god that's not the actual cause of it!
thick cunt.

File: 1504115322311.jpg (2MB, 2808x3140px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2808x3140px

>>39477734
listen here cuckoid beta.
if a women got 10 guys before you, meaning the average satisfaction rate will be lower and the relationship will vanish quikly after.
on the otherhand if you got yourself a virgin gf who never ever experienced "sex" she will instently be forever attracted to you and be remembering you as her first "love".
>inb4 insecure virgin.
once again im talking about relationship not performing an intercourse with a roastie.

File: smug_pepe_pissed_pants.png (163KB, 303x566px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 303x566px

>>39475472
she doesnt have any roastie flaps you stupid normie

Depends heavily on the context. If they have had 4 relationships over 5 years, it's probably fine. If they have had 4 relationships over 5 months you can start to worry.

File: 1504133077518.jpg (127KB, 700x894px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 700x894px

>>39477785
>482 BILLION I SWEAR GUYS !!!!!!
>NUCLEAR WEAPON I SWEAR GUYS!!!!!1!1!!!!
gotta love shekelberg wagie cuck orbiter.
pic related u cuck.

>>39477559
>>39477826
https://spankbang.com/1h71w/video/skinny+white+girl+bbc+training

>>39477959
you're an original god among men anon

I have my limits. But mostly what keeps me from being able to judge is, I know what its like. Sex. Its good. However, when a girl has a reputation as a bicycle it raises red flags that tell any sensible human being to either back away, or make her a one time thing.

>>39473616
They pretend they don't care because they think it's "cool". Keep in mind that almost everything that normies do is done because they just want to "fit in" and "be cool". Notice their speaking algorithms change yearly, with them saying things one year that they will never say the next, simply because they are copying whatever is "in". Right now, it's "in" to not care about a woman's past and what she's stuffed in her cockhole. A lot of them will lead on sentences with a statement like "Is it weird if I..." because they want affirmation that they are not weird, or if what they are saying/doing IS weird, they will immediately receive feedback and adjust their entire lifestyle to conform.

Pathetic, really.

File: 1504096387618.jpg (60KB, 635x410px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 635x410px

>>39477897
you have taken only a few redpills anon.
now listen and join the robotdom.
If you still want to continue take the red pill if you want to leave now and stay in your delusion take the blue pill.
blue pill: you're right anon, they are just insecure beta cucks.


red pill: if you want to settle with a girl she must be a virgin, you must be the first guy in her pure preserved vagina.
a women with multiple sexual intercourse and parterners will have a hard time getting an orgasm knowing how chad cock was in comparision with yours.
now if you just want a one time thing, then you can go ahead and fuck as many roastie as you want,
pic related anon.

>>39474956

>guy fucks my food

Yeah I'm not eating that.

>>39477508
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newscientist.com/article/dn24817-ancient-hunter-gatherers-had-rotten-teeth/amp/

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20160229-how-our-ancestors-drilled-rotten-teeth

^pleade read :^)

Listen man, why the fuck are we even talking about this? How did we get from talking about virgin vs non virgin women to this ? We can go back and forth all day about wether ancients people had better teeth. Sure, I'll agree that due to a less sugary died like your first article suggest, the romans did infact that good teeth. But it was due to a, what again? Less sugary diet, nothing about a woman's past partner.

As far as the issue with the dogs, domesticated dogs can generally have pups twice a year, so you could imagine how much wild dogs or wild animals in general mate, often times not with the same male, and their young come out fine.
>Truly smart people get their answers on their own
Did you conduct the research for how ancient people have perfect teeth? Or how about regarding the dogs? No. You got it offline, in other words, from someone else. That's not getting your answers "on your own" and makes you no better than me.

Now back to the topic at hand, truly smart people know that statistics can only show correlation and not causation. Hopefully you're iq isn't passed onto your kids. And like I said before, there's no sufficient evidence of genes being passed from a past partner in humans, and even if it is possible the odds are slim to none.

>>39478059
this anon got it all right, steam id desu.

>>39477846
>if she has a shitty character, like most roasties tend to
>le all rosaries are shitty
No wonder you aren't married and probably never will
>she will value herself on what she can offer besides that, which is sex
I love how you think you can hypothetically pyscho analyze women and not only that, genuinely believe that all women's minds considering what and how they value things works the same. This must be the sort of mind gymnastics pseudo intellectual bull shit you faggots believe, kek.

>>39477866
Statistics show correlation and not causation. Not an argument. You can show me all the statistics you want, none of them even consider the countless other co tributing factors that also lead to unsuccessful relationships, and thus are rendered shitty examples.
>>39477908
>Le Jew monster aaaaahhhh!!!
Can you stay on topic here you low attention span faggot? We're talking about virgin vs non virgin here, take that shit to /pol/.

File: oVkyoIO.png (764KB, 967x875px) Image search: [Google]

764KB, 967x875px

>>39473616
pick the correct girl and one does not even have to consider said girl's past anon

>>39478281
keep getting mad cuck beta,

>>39478429
n o t a n a r g u m e n t

ravioli ravioli this comment is originaloli

>>39477826
>>39477959
>>39478004
Cucks like you two need to hang from trees.

>>39474425
>so far
lmao

>>39473616
By having sexual pasts of their own.
>tfw more experienced than my gf
>tfw have taught her to enjoy being abused
>tfw can finally live out most of my fantasies and all I needed to do was find an inexperienced girl

>>39474163
>hey guys, gunthony fantano here

>>39479784
goddamnit
rnifisncds

>>39475472

hymen you fucking retard

>>39473616
If you have slept with a girl yourself it isn't an issue. I have been with one girl, my ex. Four years and we probably had sex over 500 times. That is a fucking lot more than most stacies have had in all their combined one night stands etc. How can I expect a girl to not have her own experiences if I've indulged myself to such an extreme?

>>39473616
Because we are well adjusted human beings that don't hangups about trivial shit, and we know that for both men and women we don't always end up with mr/ms right on our first try.

Guys and girls mess around and meet new people in order to get a grasp on love life and how one should choose a mate, and in the process also learn about themselves and what they want in a partner, and how to behave in a relationship yada yada.

Obsessing over your partners past is unhealthy and unnecessary, go out there and play nice silly child.

>>39474163
Schoolthony Shootano here

>>39474163
This board was not created as a safe space for loser tards, I was here alongside plenty of "normal fags" since r9k was launched, and it sure wasn't a crap ton of self-loathing threads about how life ain't fair you fucking degenerate cunts

>>39480037

Did you also experiment with your own gender in the locker room, you know - to get an idea o what you want in a partner and how to behave in a relationship?

>>39473795
>kissing a woman when her lips were probably on another dudes dick in the past
>probably

If something have 99.999% probability it is not "probably".

See it this way

fucking her means you are cucking all her past lovers

>How are normies able to not care about a girl's sexual past?

because they have their own sexual past, you only care because you're a virgin or have had limited sexual experience

>>39480180

Anon not the guy you're responding to, but just because this board was created for 'x' reason, and just because normies and roasties have been here since the beginning - doesn't mean you belong here. r9k evolved into a board for the beautiful ones - introverted, sensitive males of high intelligence. Preferably virgin. You don't belong here and never will.

File: 1467856955091.jpg (16KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x480px

>>39474442

/thread

shut it down now.

>>39473795
Blow yourself up for 70 virgins then

>>39474163
This board use to be about general women hatred and men who were actively avoiding relationships to save money and avoid compromising their time.
If anything you virgins ruined this board with your incessant whining about not being able to get a gf.

>>39478071
>red pill
God damn mgtow cunts have appropriated our meme. Redpill means holocaust denial, not voluntary celibacy by neckbeards

They do care, they just pretend like they don't because it's socially frowned upon to care. If you showed a guy a video of her at a party sucking 10 dicks from 5 years ago, he would absolutely care. He wouldn't be like "Oh it was just in the past, whatever."

I don't care because I'm a hedonist. Why the fuck should I care? It's not as if I'm gonna marry some girl. I'm in this for sex. I never plan on marrying or being in a long term relationship because it doesn't appeal to me.

Also the fact I was born blessed with a trouser python helps me reconcile it.

>>39481273
That's because it's easy to put something in the past and pretend it didn't happen when you didn't witness it. When its right in front of you for all to see, its far more visceral and hard to get by.

because we do not see women as objects which lose value when they are "used"

I care, I just don't tell women I care and I leave them wondering for what reason they were dumped. It torments them, it bothers them deeply when you just dump them and don't tell them why.

I've slept with 50 women, which isn't even that many. It would be pretty hypocritical of me to care that someone I was with had slept with more than a handful of people.

>>39481064

No, this board used to be /b/ but focused on original content. It had threads about history, sci-fi, politics, films, music, news, relationships, advice, it had rate and raid threads and all kinds of wonderful things. It used to have a mascot of a green-faced anonymous gentleman wearing a suit.

/r9k/ Was the main 4chan board for a year or two. It was never meant to be what it is now.

>>39475725
>The Richter scale was invented with him in mind
That's a fucking brilliant line. If I could actually fuck without cumming in 2 minutes of thrusting I'd use that line

>>39473616
My ex was a whore.
I was told by several of my mates that she's a whore.
She fucked a few of my mates not long before we got together (didn't find out for a while).
We split up after 2 years because she was exchanging nudes with mates of mine.

Whores will most likely always be whores.

File: Winnie the Pooh chaos.gif (1MB, 320x287px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x287px

>girl I'm going out with asks me about my sexual history
>I'm KHV but I make up some bullshit about having slept with 2 women before
>she tells me she's had sex with 20 guys and a few times in threesomes
>I scream internally

>>39482309
Literal nightmare fuel, why would anyone admit that

>>39482328
She obviously didn't think it was a big deal. She was really surprised when I said 2 and basically said "Wow, Anon, I thought you would be at like 10 at least."

Because normalfags are subhumans.
Normalcattle deserves to be holocausted.