When do you think women peak in attractiveness? I'm fine

27 is the optimum age
Some are certainly still hot in 30s but I'd say on average 27 is the peak.

>>39421333
Unironically between 12 and 16

5-8, maybe.

>>39421349

That's a good answer. Late 20s chicks still look young, but have a hint of sexy maturity.

>>39421356
>>39421367
Women, not children. Pedofags are retarded.

>>39421356

You're unironically a creep

16 is okay if you're 18-19, 12 is not okay unless you're super close in age

>>39421394
even if they're joking that's still lame

Is it normal that I have little attraction for women over the age of like 43?

I can't jack it to milf porn

File: Jamie-Leigh-Parker[1].jpg (31KB, 615x409px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 615x409px

>>39421394
>>39421400
Tell me how this girl isn't beautiful.

Either before they hit puberty or after they turn 65.

File: 14474302_1169085443172094_7832800560012066816_n.jpg (237KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1080x1080px

white girls: early 20's

>>39421459
she's cute in a non-sexual way, but she is not someone I want to bone. When she's 18, that will change most likely.

>>39421496
I wonder if she has smelly feet

>>39421333
It depends on your preference. I personally like women of any ages (except old ladies above 60 or 70 though they can look much better with the right clothes and make-up). I apreciatte the beauty of a teenager as much as a mature woman. Hell even little girls' beauty

>>39421394
>Women, not children
Breaking my balls here, anon.

File: 16387235_983944818404632_5145617174149415299_n.jpg (16KB, 235x315px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 235x315px

>>39421440
Most people dont anon. Any female over the age of about 30 is considered out of the prime

File: shakira.jpg (86KB, 567x700px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 567x700px

>>39421542
Early 30s is till prime IMO, up to 35 depending on the chick

late 30s and early 40s I can still deal with, pic related I would still sniff her asshole and she's 40

>>39421515
Why 18?
>Gone through puberty?
Nope. She started it probably around 8 to 11 and will finish up around 16.
>Fully developed physically?
Nope. She'll likely finish developing in early 20s.
>Mentally mature?
Nope. That'll be when she's around 26 to 30. Our brains need to develop judgment skills into our late 20s.
>Legal?
Maybe legal where you're from but I could live in a country where it's legal to be with a pubescent woman.
Face it, the only reason 18 is the marker for "boning" for you is because most of the ideas and opinions you have are socially constructed, not because of any "facts" or "truths".

>>39421569

a 12 year old is clearly not mature in any sense of the word

a 16 year old is much closer to being adult like, but personally I stick with 18+.

>>39421569
>Face it, the only reason 18 is the marker for "boning" for you is because most of the ideas and opinions you have are socially constructed, not because of any "facts" or "truths".
so wise anon-sama

>>39421638
Did I say I care about maturity? I'm wondering why you think 18 is the magic age for sexual relations with a woman.
Oh, it's because you're an American living in the 21st century whose point of view is dictated by others and social stigma. And for some reason you think your society's viewpoint should be the same for everyone else.

>>39421667

You gotta draw the line somewhere, 18 is a good point for that, but I think 16-17 is okay too if you're close in age and not 40.

Why exactly do you need to fuck chicks who are way under 18? I'm 22 and I rarely get sexually attracted to chicks under the age of like 17.

File: shakira.jpg (65KB, 620x827px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 620x827px

>>39421561
>Shakira
My fucking nigga. They make em good in Columbia from what I can tell, she's stunning for her age.

>>39421729
Hell yeah, she's fine.

There's a 32 year old (I'm guessing) Colombian chick at my job, I wanted her so bad and she even seemed to like me at first, but for some reason she seemed to have stopped liking me. Random tangent, but it made me sad.

>>39421333
10 yo.
Not for debate.

>>39421333
>I'm fine with anything 18-40 of course, but I think chicks are hottest from 27-32.
agreed

for me anything 15-50 can be hot like fire, but 27-32 is prime when it comes to sexyness

File: file.png (276KB, 715x476px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 715x476px

>>39421333
A prime age for a girl. is 14-19. You know that girl who died because her sister was streaming on IG live? I found her cute af. The more isolated I am the less I'm giving a fuck about society's norms.

>>39422069
I dig 18-19 year old chicks but 14 is way too young

>>39422079
Too young because you don't like it? Or because legal reasons?

>>39422090
I'm not into 14 year olds, and legal reasons

17 is the absolutely lowest I would go (I'm 22)

>>39422103
I can respect that.
You have been muted for 2 seconds, because your comment was not original.

16 is the peak for most of them and that peak level stays consistent for 5 years or so and then get less attractive as time goes on.

I know everyone has their own opinion, but I don't see how anyone can be attracted to tanned, saggy, wrinkly, stretch marked, chunky mayo assed 40+ year old women. The sight of them in sleeveless shirts or nightwear literally brings on flu-like symptoms.

>>39422258
I'm not the into chicks over 40, but 30s are still good

>>39421333
they learn how to use it
and how to be people instead of clingy teens