Why doesn't someone make a Tinder for 4channers only?

>>39405390
>Why doesn't someone make a Tinder for 4channers only?
I don't want to talk to fucking women
I want to smash their skulls
I want to watch women feel extreme pain

>>39405390
They did, it's called /soc/

>>39405390
Because it would attract the same kind of normies that browse /soc/ and /b/.

One of two things would happen:
>eventually flood with stacies looking for attention, followed by chads looking for easy pussy, becoming an alternate to tinder with no real difference
>Dead on launch because anons (fem or not) don't find each other desirable

>>39405413
t. frustrated trapfag after realizing he can never compete

>>39405484
>Dead on launch because anons (fem or not) don't find each other desirable
I wonder how many robots are lonely simply because they have unrealistic expectations or if it's because women only date significantly up.

>>39405390
Because this website is mostly men

>>39405429
implying /r9k/ isn't overrun by wannabe robot normies

>>39405505
Anyone browsing this site knows what kind of losers who post here, even if they think it somehow doesn't magically apply to them. The very idea of that kind of person is unattractive.

>>39405536
See the first scenario.

File: 1487753577441.jpg (495KB, 1440x1005px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1440x1005px

>>39405571
>Anyone browsing this site knows what kind of losers who post here, even if they think it somehow doesn't magically apply to them. The very idea of that kind of person is unattractive.
Trapfags are delusional enough to think they're anime girls.