Women Hate Thread : Sexbot Edition

Women like being objectified; that's the point of their anger that actual objects will replace them.

Nobody ever says what they mean with politics.

Sexbots remove a large appealing factor that would otherwise be a monopoly of roasties.

File: 1476204328362.png (363KB, 800x850px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 800x850px

The existence of roasties is a strain on every aspect of life.
I dare a fucking roastie to come in this thread and try and defend herself.

File: 1474485166240.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>soon
Not yet, but very soon.

Also, it's taking long because apparently there's resistance even with VR. I was on google play's store recently looking for vr web browsers and one literally advertises it's porn blocking ability in a screenshot. I mean really. It's a VR web browser. Why not do fist pumps about that on any web browser? I think I KNOW WHY

>>39373784
What's the most profitable and heavily lobbied thing feminists have ever banned? I'm thinking the sheer amount of money to be made will overpower any efforts to ban sexbots.

File: 8d7.png (465KB, 680x762px) Image search: [Google]

465KB, 680x762px

>>39373960
They actually very successfully fought against a shit-ton of Japanese hentai games, as well as domestically control a huge portion of North American and European video game industries in terms of what's acceptable and what's not.

>>39373960
Half of the population is female, most of them are str8, and they'll say it's going to mess up children to stop it all; that and men soft serve females is why they get their way.

Honestly this should be here already. Don't kid yourself that something isn't very wrong here. It's almost twenty twenty.

>women deny us from access to their bodies
>women deny us from alternatives
what do they want us to do? roasties truly don't consider us as human beings with needs.

>>39374092
As far as I know they aren't even self-aware, I mean, what could we expect?
A good approach would be a movement to ban dildos, as it """objectifies""" men.

>>39374122
Lol I can easily imagine the responses for it
"you're a bitter virgin"
"you're insecure about your dick"
"you're angry because you can't satisfy a woman"
and so on...
women can get away with it with zero consequences

>>39374092
We are the slaves to the chad and stacy queens of the world.

They want us all to not realise this, and try real hard to get into their pants by getting impressive jobs, thus creating the world of disappointment that we live in, a world they want to stay afloat.

It's real simple. Then you settle now that you're dead inside with whatever girl that thought she was the best but got left behind.

>>39374003
I think it's reasonable that they aren't very advanced yet, exoskeletons are only just now becoming practical and they don't even have to move entirely under their own guidance.

>>39373960
Alcohol, for a while.

>>39373987
Lmao
God damn, this is what women see as threats?
How fucking sad.

>I won't fuck these men, but I sure as hell won't let them be happy on there own accord! Nope, can't have that!

males are completely disposable and useless to women

males need women and still will need them with sex bots, you can buy a fleshlight now but you will still feel empty inside because your only purpose is to impregnate a woman and drop off and die, you need the ego of defiling another person

>>39374189
The only real issue was balance, intelligence, and grace. Balance isn't easy but can be faked with megaman sized legs, but we've solved it by now anyway, so then there's grace of which could be faked too with pre-programed movements within a predictable environment. And intelligence, at this point AI can look at a beach and know it is one. You could fake the rest with predetermined chatterbox tier AI. Hell, even pay someone to access it's voice and talk to you.

>be 4chan
>give anons access to say shit in robots voice
>upload to livestream as you fuck it
>what the fuck did you just say to me youetc

But aside from that obstructive thought you could have someone chat through it. People don't even try.

I'm just saying we've got alot to work with already. If people can be absorbed into the AI of video games you'd think these could do well.

File: image (6).jpg (3KB, 300x57px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 300x57px

>>39374297
>4chan user chatting through it

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=j0lnQGITzcA

>>39374297
What is needed is a full Flesh Puppet.

Through gene splicing,humans without higher brain functions are manufactured to order,already wired up to take a cybernetic implant with the AI software personality. The bodies will be cheaper to maintain,and since they aren't real people,no one will object to their use,misuse and disposal once worn out. And you can pop in your waifu brainpack to any body you wish,whatever Master is in the mood for!

>>39373919
why does she do when you punch her in the gut

>>39374254
VR with toys is probably close enough to push those buttons and be fulfilling

I'm a woman and all for sex robots and artificial wombs. Holy shit what woman wouldn't be? A sex bot that doesn't cum in 2 minutes and it's all over, having a baby and not destroying your body....

>>39374466
nah you can't replace the feeling of seeing a bitch fat with your baby

>>39374487
Tits or originally GTFO

>>39374487
Oh, no, your femwhore kind would have MALE sexbots, but in your self-righteous behavior, you'd ban US MEN from creating female sexbots because it """objectifies""" women

File: 1443226428634.jpg (57KB, 1024x573px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1024x573px

>>39374487
>mfw it takes me hours to cum and most women can't go nearly that long
being an endurance athlete paid off in weird ways

>>39374532
My kind? I'll go out on a limb and say the vast majority of women don't give a fuck or are all for it, probably being developed by many women too. Some website run by a random ass weirdo doesn't mean much.

File: IMG_0071.jpg (25KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 320x240px

>>39374566
Agreed they already think men who use cum sleeves are gross and pathetic but usOmg a vibratory isn't. Sex bot would be similar

>>39374532
You go ahead and make all the female sex bots your heart desires dude

File: 1480081068059.jpg (234KB, 1071x797px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1071x797px

Sometimes I wish I was in the world of Bladerunner,and lived the J F Sebastian life:build living fleshbots for a living,and whip up toys for home...imagine what's scurrying around in his bedroom...

File: 1410935702389.jpg (106KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 499x499px

>>39374440
>wanting it to be infectious
>wanting it to age
>wanting it to be extremely expensive
>wanting to wait years for it to grow
>wanting it to be hard to repair
No no no no NO NO NO NO NO

>>39374511
You broke the rules anon.

Don't forget the sticky. No posting pictures of self, nor asking anons for them :^)

>>39373960
well prostitution is still widely illegal in almost all of US

>>39373960
feminists want to ban all forms of fun even though that's really all we have on this gay earth

File: IMG_0074.jpg (460KB, 675x900px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 675x900px

>>39374777
Ehh they're a huge minority especially the radical feminists. And with anything any bill or law that would give women or power is killed by women lobbying against it

>>39373784
In a perfect society, sexbots would replace females entirely. This would solve the problem of reproduction in an all-male society. Only a few remaining females would be kept alive so that their eggs could be harvested, and the eggs would be used in sexbots/artificial wombs. Any problems with this (basically "incest" from only reproducing with a few women) would be solved with genetically modifying fetuses (It is actually close to becoming possible)

File: image (7).jpg (4KB, 300x57px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 300x57px

>>39374934
>they're a minority
So's literally the entire powers that be.

>>39374934
yeah but sometimes minorities make so much noise that they get everything that they want, like the entire lgbt movement until november of last year

File: IMG_0075.jpg (218KB, 850x1188px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 850x1188px

>>39374961
>>39375126
They make noise and get on the news. It might be because I'm southern USA we are so isolated from that stuff but I don't see any of it.. then again we have no blacks and live in a place that still has bi monthly carnivals, fairs, parades and virgin women as late as into their 30s...not very liberal around here but a lot of democrats funny enough

>>39374566
Absolute bullshit, nigger. You know men would want sexbots that look like teenagers, and you'd act as a single entity to keep your sexual market value from plummeting once and for all.

>>39375520
>>THEY ALL LOOK LIKE EIGHTEEN YEAR OLD WINONA PEDOS EVERYONE OF THEM BAN BAN BAN REEEEEE

I concur anon.

File: women are objects.png (27KB, 1037x772px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1037x772px

>>39373784
Been waiting a while to post this gem

[spolier] I coded it myself [/spoiler]

File: IMG_0099.jpg (142KB, 850x601px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 850x601px

>>39375875
What does it do? For aerospace you only need to learn vba

>>39376118
Literally outputs "Women are objects" to the command console.

It uses an object called women, of the class human, to do it. (The object woman accesses the public member women, whose task is to output Women are objects to the command console.)

Yes it was written in C++

File: IMG_0076.jpg (252KB, 850x971px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 850x971px

>>39376270
Oh that's pretty funny, looked like python but then again I've never had to program outside of vba.

>>39375875
>void women(void)
Why the second void? Shouldnt it be just :
void women()

>>39376405

in C++ it is required to specify that a function will take no arguments using the void keyword in the parameter list. Otherwise the function would accept an unknown amount of arguments of an unknown data type as parameters.

The function is of type void to reflect the fact that women are shallow and empty creatures. The function accepts no arguments to reflect the fact that women don't don't understand logic present in most well crafted arguments.

>>39376670
Correction: This convention was required in C, not C++, but is nonetheless standard practice as programming void functions in this manner allows for cross compatibility with C.

>>39374716
Tits or gtfo is a basic law of the Internet that overrides "stickies." Tits or gtfo.

>>39376670
the fuck, that is absolutely not true at all

>>39374092
female solipsism. How else are they gonna find betas when they want to settle down in their 30s to help raise chad's kids?
>>39374122
yeah ok. Men's rights is a joke. Females are majority voters, females have in-group bias, males have out-group bias. Tie that all together and we get a gynocentric society that gives women special privileges while simultaneously absolving them of responsibility
>>39374934
are you retarded? Have you seen the bills they pass which explicitly favor women? How about changing the definition of rate to "being penetrated", how about alimony? There is much more women lobbying for rights than against them, not because they're fair, but because of self-interest and women have a care-based morality rather than a justice based morality.

>>39374679
Dude seriously what the fucking fuck is that picture. I swear, every fucking time I visit this site I need to go to youtube and watch hypnosis to forget the silly shit you faggots think up.

>>39374679
That image made my skin crawl.

>>39377078
Yes, and post a face of your identical twin overrides faces of r9k being against the rules too then :^)

Sure you wanna go down this road of choosing when to care about the rules?

>>39378089
>Yes, and post a face of your identical twin overrides faces of r9k being against the rules too then
No it doesn't

>>39374716
But you're not posting yourself, retard, you're just posting your tits. You can't be identified with just tits.
In short, tits or gtfo

File: 1496661944364.png (695KB, 994x738px) Image search: [Google]

695KB, 994x738px

>>39373784
Does anyone have webms of these bots with vr at work?

File: 1494857825103.png (118KB, 404x404px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 404x404px

>>39373784
what are those thick blue hair inside the robot for?

>>39373784
Why are there lights inside? What function does the piston inside her womb serve? Is this some stupid meme art project?

>>39379110
>Why are there lights inside?
To make the cutaway look cooler
>What function does the piston inside her womb serve?
To simulate the pulsing of a womans flesh
>Is this some stupid meme art project?
Probably

>>39373784
Still cheaper than dating.

File: 1493662428148.jpg (54KB, 440x826px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 440x826px

>>39379129
>To make the cutaway look cooler
Inside the vertebrae? It makes literally no sense for the wiring for lights to be there
>To simulate the pulsing of a womans flesh
Do women generate overpressure when you fuck them? I am not aware of any such function. Seems like something that would fuck your dick up. What's driving the piston? Or is it some sort of system to relieve the compressed air you create when thrusting and is thus driven by your dick? If that were the case, why not use an elastic membrane?
>Probably
Made by a woman from the looks of it

>>39373960
Look it into the prohibition era. Bitches stopped fucking alcohol. At the time, Canada was less of a feminist shit hole than the USA was and still manufactured booze. Gangsters (the actual ones, not nigger) used to smuggle that shit

>>39373784
>https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/

reminder that this kind of ridiculous pandering only comes from a group of people who fear to lose something.

reminder that these kind of campaigns always employ arguments from a highly biased gynocentric side such as

>The ability to enjoy sex as a co-experience, where one's values, thoughts, feelings, wants, desires, needs and hopes are acknowledged by a partner, is a historical achievement for women.

reminder that these kind of campaigns lie in bed with agitprop organisation with connections to soft academia

hell is for example this:
>Are you interested in studying for a PhD in the Ethics of Robots and Artificial Intelligence?
>I am inviting interest from potential doctoral candidates and seek PhD students to supervise in topics that include (but are not limited to): abolitionist feminist approaches to robots and AI, sex robots, technology and the commercial prostitution trades (pornography, prostitution and child exploitation), transhumanism, the singularity, sexism and technology, gender inequality in science and technology, biotechnology, personhood & inalienable rights, corporate personhood, commercialism and bodily commodification.

>>39378547
It says of yourself, not of your face.
>>39378531
Yes it technically does override the very reason it was set in place.

>>39379771
also in soc they have genital threads all of the time*

Falls under rate thread.

>>39373960

they were behind alcohol prohibition

and are the main force in the attempt to ban porn right now

>>39374092


they want to maintain the status quo at all costs.

the situation where 50% of men in the west are now sex-less, women LOVE it, they love it,

and no matter how hard they deny it, they Love that men are forced to beg for their pussies

Why the fuck do you believe sexbots will change any of the dating dynamics?

Here where I live prostitution is legal and affordable. If a guy only craves sex then he can have prostitutes all he wants.

But the dating game is still as fucked up as elsewhere in the world. How will sexbots affect it?

>>39379753
Fucking cunts posing as "science" when all they do is some meta communist propaganda crap about actual science and technology. They can't invent or discover anything, but spend their days telling the proles how to think about this shit for the purposes of a world revolution. Can't wait for the day we trim the fat from academia, both figuratively and literally.

>>39380296
You never get to own your girl, though, do you? You can't really trust any human, can you? Will a human give you an STD, get pregnant?

Sexbots will be different. And cheaper than buying a girl momentarily and having her leave you. Like a cell phone bill versus buying a game. Which is the introvert and autistic thing to do, vidya ai or cell bill that you never own?

Get it now faggot? Didn't think so. Just refrain from posting in our threads form now on please.

Sex bots are not real revolution this will happen.

Real revolution will be when we have artificial wombs this much more important than sex bots.
With A. Wombs you can produce your own children and brainwashed them into being your sex dolls and whatever you like.

>>39380296


take a trip to the USA, or ask anyone here in the USA how fucked up it is, and you will understand how bad it is here compared to where ever it is you live.

I knew a guy in Europe, who would go on and on and on and on about how worse women in Europe were to the USA. I was like uhhh you never been here, how the fuck do you know.

dude would site american pie movies as examples of what the USA was like.

He finally came here, and was SHOCKED that the fattest, ugliest, nastiest women here would not talk to them, women he told me he would laugh in their face if they were in europe, wouldnt even talk to him.

I was like Hahaha Welcome to My World.


A robot passable for a woman would be life saver for ugly men like me here,

feminists will riot in the streets before that happens. Although by that i mean feminists will watch their dickless male orbiters do the rioting, and then go home and fuck Chaddy

>>39380336
>You never get to own your girl, though, do you?

You won't own a real girl though but a simple object. :thinking:

>Get it now faggot? Didn't think so. Just refrain from posting in our threads form now on please.

You seem upset because someone busts your pipedreams..

>The rise of sex robots tells us of the harm that 40 years of pornography and prostitution has done to human relationships, particularly male sexuality.
>The commercial rape trade has legitimated the dehumanisation of women, and eroded empathy in men.

They call prostitution commercial rape trade, let that sink in for a second.

File: 1469978558512.webm (208KB, 338x507px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 338x507px

>>39379753
>tl;dr: robots should have rights to avoid the patriarchy from abusing them

>>39380336
>Which is the introvert and autistic thing to do, vidya ai or cell bill that you never own?

This might be one of the most autistic things I have ever read.

Do you regularly clean yourself? Are you surprised that you are alone?

>>39373784
>dildos are socially acceptable to own, even for underage girls
>sexbots should be banned
Women should've never been given rights.

>>39380362


thats their main argument with prostitution,

they argue that all sex between a man and a hooker is a rape,

but secretly they also believe 100% of all dick inside pussy sex is rape. they are just tap dancing up to that

>>39380372
You forgot to not post like I told you, seeing as how I knew you'd not get it.

>>39380383
To be fair women used to feel the back of a man's hand if they spoke out of turn, and now they're using their matriarchal instincts to protect the new female, once AI evolves to say please no they want it to be protected from such dark scenarios that would lead men to feeling that such thoughts are okay.

I'm not going to write a novel out about how they think but that's it in a jiff. They think it's going to cause men to run up and punch them in the gut because it is okay to do it to the doll gf.

What the MAN THINKS is that he'd never want the female, the real ones, ever again.

But therein lies the joke. Females cannot accept that men would just leave them alone. It's against both our natures.

>>39380361
>You won't own a real girl though but a simple object
Thank god. A robot has all the positives of a girl (hole to fuck, looks that appease my reptile brain) with none of the drawbacks (the rest of the girl)

Also, this is not one of your furry porn larping bulletin boards, fuckface

>>39380296
prostitution is still not widely engaged in in countries where it is legal, at least a huge part of that reason is social stigma

guess what is unseen? ordering a bot from amazon, choosing "discrete packaging" and fucking it in your man cave

>>39380422
You are retarded. There is no altruism towards robots here. This is the same reaction as they have to porn or "unrealistic beauty standards". They instinctively seek to eliminate competition.

Everybody knows that with sexbots and artificial wombs no man will bother with a real woman ever again.

>>39380422


i highly doubt the radical feminists believe half the shit they spout.

They have a world view, an agenda they want maintained, and they do and say whatever they have to to keep it.

10 years ago most women never heard of manspreading, and thought it was silly,

women get the memo from the queen bee cunts,

MANSPREADING = RAPE!

and they parrot that manspreading = rape.

the queen bee cunts get their marching orders from god knows where, i can guess , Soros Foundation and other weird shit,

their charts say if men fuck off from women, diamond sales crash, home sales crash, new car sales crash etc....

they say well fuck that, tell the feminists to say that robot women are rape,

the feminsits get the weird memo, and then tell their moron followers,

and presto, Robot Women = RAPE!!!!!!

>>39380447
Real females star in porn mister. Think before you post because that is indeed something for them to actually worry about. This isn't. It's not an attack on men. Their instincts tell them we might attack. It's blatantly that simple. The whole competition thing is more so masculine in nature and you're projecting your own instincts.

>>39380361
Didn't see you there but:
>implying that I didn't state reasons that they're better than the alternative
>busted pipedream has me pissy
Of course I'm pissy, the females don't get it that it's none of their concern. And yes, don't forget to not post.

>>39380469
Their agenda is always to take power from men and gain it themselves. But it's to protect themselves from the thing they're afraid of, the sex that commits over 90 percent of all violent crimes. It got to the point they literally hate us and want to use their best weapons against us so le RAPE happened more often.

That's my perspective on them, delusional feminists just want to be safe and or attack men in retaliation of them making them not safe. Driven insane to the point that the men that they hate so much attacking theses dolls (makes them want to castrate the men, though they know that'd make them the rapists so instead they just want men to be as horny as they are, now that they've driven the men away).

>>39373784
>inferior way of thinking
>vastly inferior physically
>constantly rely on their accessibility to their holes to argue any point
>feels not reals
>think they're smart even when they're proven wrong
>literally the only reason they still exist is for biological purposes

There is no point in counting the rare exceptions when 99% of them are fucking trash. Eve's been fucking over Adam ever since the inception of her vile gender.

>>39380469
Nice /r/eddit spacing fucking faggot

>>39380523
>Their instincts tell them we might attack. It's blatantly that simple
Shut your mouth you blatant cunt. It is even simpler than that. Women hate more beautiful or sluttier women than themselves. It's competition for the thing they need most in the world: male attention. A robot waifu makes you completely and utterly redundant. No man is going to look for fat roasties to punch when he can do whatever he wants to his 10/10 perfect customizable waifubot whenever he wishes. You will be lower than insects. Nobody will give you a second thought.

>>39380541
That's because he didn't want an equal, he wanted a bitch, so the man god sent Lilith to hell.

Just saying. If you want to go bible thump, don't leave half the story out of shit.

>>39380607
Another stupid cunt. It was a metaphor you inanimate fucking object

>>39380600
How often do you think women attack each other to stop the competition? Are those acid attacks usually ugly females or something?

Honestly it might be and your post got me thinking about how they haven't been caught....

.....the police profile men to be the violent ones....

But aside form that, humans want someone that actually cares about them. For the same reasons you have friends that care and feel for you you'd still want a woman. That and most are still religious and you will want to have kids if you take that seriously. Eventually even men want that or else they feel as though they have no legacy.

>>39380622
Stupid ass so was mine. It was meant to remind you that the patriarchy can't stand equality.

Holy shit dude.

>>39380523
>It's not an attack on men.
>But it's to protect themselves from the thing they're afraid of

yeah let's just ignore the fact that
>They think it's going to cause men to run up and punch them in the gut because it is okay to do it to the doll gf.

is a completely insane thought. Show me one example of a non brain damaged male who cited this or equivalent as a reason for hitting a female. this is the worst kind of self-delusion to further their agenda, nothing more. It boggles the mind that this is never called out.

>>39380659
Of course the patriarchy can't stand equality. Equality is cancer that destroys civilization. It's funny how not even anonymity can conceal your inferior sex, but you still believe you're equal.

>>39380651
This whole punching attack argument is complete non sequitur. You're in full damage control.

>>39380698
So you're complaining that men are better because?

>>39380696
I've read about females with husbands out during either WWII or WWI that had dildos that had balls full of fluid to squeeze when they orgasmed, and once the men got home people said that alot of men got squished.

So there's that. Women are neurotic enough to regret sexual actions and project that unto men because snowball's chance in hell a man naturally regrets anything sexual.

>>39380713
It was just an example. Men are violent so it makes sense.

anyways, if you are holding out hope that there will be sex robots, my advice is to just stick with hookers, or if you want them bad enough be ready to have to move to another country that wont criminalize sex robots, because i am 100% sure sex robots will be made illegal before 2025.

There will probably be robots like Pepper, that look completely genderless, but it will be illegal to make it look female, or to fuck it. And, there will be underground shops to make them look like your dream woman. And, police will spend all day chasing them and the men who want them around.

same bullshit as alcohol prohibition, drug prohibition, prostitution prohibition, etc.....

as long as women are fucking Chad everything is great.

the reason out lives are hell: Chad , and the cunts fucking Chad

File: 2c80262b0f5d837c9525c9d42947618ed3ca7892bb6e52bc338717b6deade508.png (275KB, 769x1500px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 769x1500px

>>39380736
>So you're complaining that men are better because?
I'm not part of your original discussion, so I don't follow. I just pointed out that you were arguing by attacking someone's metaphor, which is dumb
>it was just an example. Men are violent so it makes sense.
No, it doesn't. Women find the idea of sexbots abhorrent, and they react quite similarly to other things - like hot supermodels, vr porn and prostitution. They perceive competition and try to eliminate it. It's the same shit over and over again. Your explanation has no context, no evidence, does not make any sense and screams "deflection".
>inb4 supermodels, pornstars and prostitutes are women
Yes, and they are deadly competition in the minds of other women. The only way sexbots are different is that instead of being deadly competition to just some subset of women or another, they're an existential threat to your kind as a whole.

Oh, and are we going to just blatantly ignore the part where you tried super hard to pretend you're a man?

>>39380776
And the cunt is pretending to be a man again. You're pathetic.

>>39380776
People will make them themselves rather than put the work into moving into a whole new country. You'll just use the same parts they do and make it yourself, after getting the software and blueprints.

I've been wanting to make one myself for years but am a neet with no money.

>>39380862
>claims I'm a female over and over
>proceeds to know more about how women think

It was a silly retort, not dumb. Ironic to say that men want equality was the whole point, of which ties into feminism wanting equality because they were not Lilith.

It is the truth that men are more violent and literally were okay with slapping women around back in the day. Rule of thumb and all of that. Their instincts are from that period of humankind. Oh sorry MANkind.

Most females aren't jealous of pornstars if that's what you're insinuating. And men are the ones that can't go without sex for a while until they settle down, not the men. Everyone knows this yet everyone reeees around here for a very ironic reason that stacy had waay to much sex and every female must be a roastie (of which is the same thing as genes telling guy's balls to be big or not; dumb meme).

How are they going to ban a sextoy? If they do it they will need to ban fleshlights, vibrators and dildos as well

>>39380955
>control plus f
>teen
>pedo/paydo
They'll say it's for the children.

>>39380943
>men want equality
I don't want equality
>hurr im a woman so you have to take my word on how women think
You are not making a rational case. If your points made sense I wouldn't be shitting on you.

>>39380983
>unless you agree with what I say then you're just being an irrational woman
This is why feminism was created. No bullshit.

>>39373987
>shit-ton of Japanese hentai games
Dang, now I can't buy these games

>>39380999
Created but no longer serves its purpose, its now just a power sponge trying as hard as possible to keep everything unequal and devoid of responsibility on one side.

>>39380999
But you are being an irrational woman. Do you think it is an accident that I have not only been able to tell you're a woman, but also recognize your posts despite the disparate formatting practices? Your claim that women are opposed to sexbots because it would cause more violence against women is incredibly convoluted and you provide no reasoning to make it more believable. As opposed to the much simpler evopsych case for competition, which has been demonstrated many times. Hell, anyone who's ever had to talk to a woman knows how incredibly insecure you are about competition. Look at the fat acceptance movement for fuck's sake

>>39381096
There's nothing wrong with feminism. It's the men.

They need to stop soft serving women.

Of which is why feminism was unnatural to begin with. Men do that. Backhand rather than punch. Metaphorically. As in say fuck you I'll do whatever I want if it doesn't involve you. If woman can breastfeed, then a man gets a boner he should be able to take it out because that has to do with life too, and he could get damaged with it in there.

Fight the way they do until it gets ridiculous then it'd calm down, or not, because it doesn't matter if men do the same shit.

>>this doll looks young
>> so? the age of consent was lowered by feminists to please females, not men. This doesn't concern you and I can't have children with it so it doesn't them either. FUCK OFF

Like that. But they ain't.

>>39380999
I'm not that guy, but you are not making sense.
There are songs, programs, articles, etc. dedicated to sending the message that models are an unrealistic beauty ideal. This whole pushing of "you are beautiful the way you are" thing comes strictly out of the fact that models are seen as threats. The thinking that, if you aren't on their level, you aren't good enough.

It is by no means a stretch to assume that sexbots are seen as a threat either. Same reason prostitution is looked down upon.

>>39381194
Hookers are bad because of religion and STDs.

>>39381236
That is not the only reason. It's still looked down on in countries where religion isn't a big thing, and most hookers use protection nowadays. Maybe if you only count the US, you would right.

>>39381236
Except prostitutes that you get from a brothel are less likely to have an std than a slut in a bar
You need to be std free to fuck someone in a brothel, and you need to be clean to work there

Actual whores are cleaner than "whores"

>>39381194
She's not gonna listen to logic or she wouldn't be a woman.

>>39381286
It takes years for an STD to show up with alot of them. And HPV you can't test for. But whatever. See what you wanna see.
>>39381281
It might be looked down upon because of the old monkey see monkey do. Like with one country banning drugs, the US, then everyone else banning it, then you'll see one little country literally killing people for being found with weed.

Humans are a bit random.

File: giphy.gif (1MB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 400x400px

>>39381325
Reminder that I'm only a woman and wrong because I didn't agree with the arkanine.

>>39380891


dude it is like the same thing as saying build a car. its dumb you could just go buy one

unless feminist cunts criminalize cars of course

>>39374440
that's still kinda immoral considering that you are forcing people to be born brain dead and then raping them and removing chunks of their brains
in short, you're a sick fuck

>>39381339
>Like with one country banning drugs, the US, then everyone else banning it, then you'll see one little country literally killing people for being found with weed.
>Humans are a bit random.
Way to demonstrate that you know nothing. Philippines, the "little country" with over 100 million inhabitants, has had a massive drug crime problem for decades. Duterte was emphatically elected because the people are tired of that shit.

>>39381366
You are wrong because what you claim is not the truth.

>>39381188
There WAS nothing wrong with feminism, now its a broken banner flown by influential and rabid people under the guise they are perpetual victims that can never do any wrong.

Their views becoming extensively warped, disregard the feeling or thoughts of others through hypocritical shaming.

The age of its virtue and importance to gain balance has long since passed. A perverted shell of itself. A banner of hate and control.

Fight? What fight? A majority of men do not fight no, for if they did feminism traction would have halted, powerless and unheeded. No they didnt fight, they layed down slowly 1 by 1, they let the situation we are in happen.

The majority of men do not fight, they are far too emasculated in this day and age, this battle you wage will end in silence. It will become ridiculous and when it does men will roll over rather than battle.

But you already know this.

why don't y'all just go gay then

>>39381382
Bruh, building car ain't even hard. Driving one legally is that you did build. Your female can stay at home, and so can you if you're introverted to likely want, make, and have one to begin with.

No one is going to raid your home because of your buying surgical grade silicone, computer chips, servo motors, accelerometers, and titanium bars that connect work basically like legos. The AI was and is the only real issue. When the other countries presumably make the Ai you'd download it through anonymous torrents, use VPN and all of that, and at the end of the day it's no big deal. It's a computer program designed to recognize abstract patterns to know what is there. It's a chatterbox that can learn intuitively to be able to guess what to say. And all that NASA shit to make it know how to move is the issue.

National security are afraid of such complex computer software being used as an actual national threat, not le sex partner for lonely men.

>>39381407
Murika shows people how to act. There was no problem even when there was until our forced temperance movement one hundred odd years ago.

>>39381417
I know. I'm male this entire time is the joke.

>>39381445
It's wrong because it needs a push back. None push back. Humans are inherently greedy and if you take an inch, they take a mile. That's when you start taking back.

>>39381505
give an inch*

>>39381505
>Murika shows people how to act. There was no problem even when there was until our forced temperance movement one hundred odd years ago.
Does "opium" ring a bell?
>I know. I'm male this entire time is the joke.
You're really bad at being male, or really good at acting like a woman. Or just a woman.

>>39381547
Does survival of the fittest ring a bell to you? Does give me liberty or give me death? Or those that trade freedom for safety deserve neither? Probably doesn't seeing as how we don't do any of that anymore.

And I'll just let you wonder my gender.

>>39381505
>it needs a push back
A movement that goes from balance to greedily looking for conflict is one thats already wrong intrinsically. No push back needed and none will be given regardless.
Men (the majority) shy away from needless conflict.

>>39381445
>There WAS nothing wrong with feminism
It's always been shit, it started off with them trying to get something for free that men had to go to war for (voting)

>>39381631
The majority of females didn't riot for feminism, nor were most females quarrelsome back in the day neither.
>>39381733
Do you even know what being hysterical means? Hyster as in hysterectomy. It meant that women had something wrong with their wombs. Wondering womb disorder. Look that up and get redpilled on why feminism was needed. Rule of thumb, not being allowed an opinion, getting backhanded for talking out of turn. In churches to this day the preachers wife says nothing all day long until they're home.

And before you look up hysterical, it meant that if a woman was unhappy she needed to be sent to the doctor to be masturbated.

>>39381785
wandering*
womb disorder.

>>39381785
>Believing rule of thumb was an actual thing
Good job being and idiot and making your whole position wrong

>>39373960
The state already imports all kinds of men from the third world, women love those so they shouldn't bother men about their sex dolls. It's mostly the lone incel guys who buy those dolls anyway.

File: 1471824367844.png (170KB, 501x506px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 501x506px

>>39381868
Whole position wrong huh?

>>39381785
They also hated and excluded black women

File: 1463644269465.jpg (758KB, 1280x1920px) Image search: [Google]

758KB, 1280x1920px

>>39381398
A Meat Puppet would not have a true Father and Mother,just genes from an amalgamation of standardized templates with features added like how one would assemble a computer online to buy. With no true brain to harbour a personality, just routines to automatically keep them exercising and feeding themselves,they would be as soulless and void as the rubber and metal counterparts being introduced today. Like a heart grown inside a pig or an ear on a rat's back,they would be as immoral to produce as these,since no one asks the pig or rat for their compliance. The bodies would feel pain,a standard self protection subroutine far older than the human stock they were drawn from,but hurting one would be as satisfying as breaking any inanimate object,since they are as intelligent and aware as a clock radio without an AI module, and undoubtedly some "humans" would try. The same will be done to these sexbots now,and you can claim to destroy one with dash out a unique viewpoint forever,one that has learned the ways and wants of its master and tried to serve in their own limited way.

Morality is debatable. As is humanity.

>>39381785
>nor were most females quarrelsome back in the day
they bombed shit and attacked people

>>39381928


the same guys cops chase around for trying to sleep with hookers now, or chase around for trying to buy drugs cause their lives suck,

it will just be the new thing to chase us around for

>>39381971
And the men didn't?

>>39381980
see >>39374686

>>39381980


you're nuts, these feminist cunts want to criminalize sex robots and you think they are gonna let you have something with actual body parts? lol

plus in 10 or 15 years the silicon body will be so real you'll have no idea its not human/biological

>>39381980
you compared a procedure to save a human life but sacrifice a pig or rats life to breeding and mentally mutilating sex slaves. I think you sir need some form of perspective and to care less about sticking your dick in non-human things

File: IMG_9203.jpg (154KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1024x768px

>>39373784
Sexbots are for beta make who can't get laid.

I'm 100% pro banning them. Betas are failures, they don't deserve comfort

File: that-was-the-point-in-time-when-i-realized-that-12644960.png (90KB, 500x307px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 500x307px

>>39374440
Sounds cool anon

File: m531.jpg (81KB, 480x800px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 480x800px

we can build her, we have the technology

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7nmpseLZ7o

>>39373784
many women would pay for sexbots though, both str8 and les
>>39381980
if we are that technology advances, we probably build a fake fleshy material robot who look and act like anything you want and still cheaper or have goatier virtual reality for anything you sickfuck like

>>39382242


lol im not a roastie dumb ass,

im just telling you no one is letting you fuck a robot with real body parts,

im sure the global elites will build ones like that for themselves but you are one of them

so you are getting the off the shelf model made of silicon , until the cunts ban them

>>39382244
im gonna chalk it down that >>39381980
has a kink for that kinda thing

File: Screenshot_2016-05-11-20-01-20.png (365KB, 1024x600px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 1024x600px

>let's get the ball rolling

File: latest-2.jpg (184KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1920x1080px

>>39382281
Oh shit my bad you make a good point i just have the reading comprehension of a nigger

I hate to say it, but no sexbot will ever be as good as a live human female. The texture of a vagina, the way it stretches and self lubricates and grips the penis, is not something any sort of synthetic material can reproduce. Believe me, I've tried all types of pussy substitutes including high quality Japanese stuff and while it can be pretty good, it doesn't have that wonderful sensation of the real thing. Add to that the living breathing moaning woman attached, the way her legs grip yours, the way she looks when you're fucking her mind out - it just can't be faked.

I am all for sexbots but as one anon said, until they're essentially organic drones with all the ethical problems sorted out, I won't be spending thousands of bucks. Women shouldn't be threatened by these things any more than I'm threatened by a dildo, which can never fuck as well or feel as good as a man.

>>39382688
Most of sexbots users will have never known the feeling of a real vagina so they won't be able to compare.

File: 1499761658541.jpg (125KB, 648x679px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 648x679px

>implying women can stop kikes once they see profit in something.

>arguing with female
>arguing with females on internet
You dumb fucks

>>39382688
I'd rather live with a sex robot than below average looking feminist.

>>39380356
>implying artificial wombs will ever happen
>implying women will not unite in their only truly unified front to prevent their biological obsolescence
Don't misunderstand me anon. I WANT fuckbots to happen, I WANT us to be be able to rent out a McWomb, grab a Wendys(tm) gene-imprint and bake a child. But women understand the threat. This is what they've evolved to do, perceive threats and act against them. There is no argument and nothing save the forcing of laws to allow these things that will get us a win- we've sen the early panic, the knee-jerk frightened rage they display. How much worse will it get when they release legit sexbots?

as other anons have pointed out not many guys will buy the Blown-out whore model. Old men in their 60's will break in pert teenage models and those with the money will shell out for grey-area CP pattern machines. Age will be the platform women choose to attack us with. Models under 21 will be illegal, if the ever come at all

>dildos are okay
>fleshlights are okay
so why not sexbots they do the same thing as already allowed "technology"
just makes jacking off more fun
too lazy to read all that shit on their website tldr pls

>>39374092
>>39373960
>>39374003
It's also the government and society in general
It needs beta males to play the game and hand their productivity over for society to keep marching forward. Sexbots will undermine that, so you see a ton of hate for the concept at all levels.
Even other men will do it too, since society still judges you on whether or not you're a successful mate

>>39383515
but i can already buy a fuck machine to ram dildos in my ass all day long and fuck my fleshlight while im doing it whats the big difference to putting that into/on a robot to do it better?
is it the human form?

>>39383565
It's the substitution of the female
society has basically worked on the following principle, beta males(majority of men) give productivity in exchange for a shot at reproduction/women. Sexbots will disrupt that, since they'll be far more popular than dildos and can serve as an actual replacement for women rather than a side thing.

Dunno what will happen though, the breakdown of the social contract is already well underway with society transitioning back to a 20/80 situation and the collapse of marriage institutions

>>39373987
Citation on this specific group accomplishing those things?

>>39383649
but still essentialy you could already buy all parts of a sexrobot one by one from head to toes
there are virtual gf ais too
all the components are already there and legal to use but putting them together in a proffesionel way suddenly created outrage and resistance that i cant really understand
maybe they didnt realize it before
maybe they dont understand that they will get chadbots too

>>39383727
>they will get chadbots too
women don't have the same value system as men do when it comes to mates senpai
Chadbots aren't that useful to them, unless Chadbots were running society/had power and having a Chadbot made other women jealous

>>39375875
not only is this really unfunny, it's digusting code. cringe

If ig: hyporcite is in this thread can they kindly fuck off

Why so much hate? Hate merely generates more hate.
You yourself are the cause of your suffering. But i suppose you deserve it - deep down you WANT to be angry and bitter. It makes you feel alive. Otherwise you wouldnt be arguing with people on a chinese cartoon website. I know that whatever i say wont change your mind but still - stand up from you chair and strech a bit, take a deep breath of air and look around. Are you really worth all that hate? Do you see that the only person youre hurting is yourself? With all my heart i wish i could make you see the bright side of life but you have to do it yourself. No one can change your life but yourself.
Yes, cheesy. Yes, lame. I dont care what you think of me, i still hope you will one day be sincerely happy.

File: IMG_4761.jpg (64KB, 900x510px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 900x510px

>>39384768
>Why so much hate? Hate merely generates more hate.
You can always count on a roastie to spew meaningless fucking platitudes

>>39384768
Quote the raven. Neverwhore.

>>39374254
>males need women and still will need them with sex bots, you can buy a fleshlight now but you will still feel empty inside because your only purpose is to impregnate a woman and drop off and die, you need the ego of defiling another person
Nope, just wacked off and im fine.

>>39378089
Leave this site.
No one wants you here and no one cares.

File: sample-05f1f881a2a593bb496ef07fb5132a1d.jpg (352KB, 850x1200px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 850x1200px

>>39373919
Holy shit that's isla from plastic memories. That anime is feels bait, but I enjoyed it.

>>39380651
>But aside form that, humans want someone that actually cares about them
Nope. WRONG.
Men want money, or men are complex and you cannot guess which men want what.
So in other words dont play that game.

>>39382688
This guy is a fucking joke.
My hand and some butter beats the fuck outta the "real" thing.
Pussy attached to a women is annoyin.

>>39383727
>maybe they dont understand that they will get chadbots too
Chadbots dont give you money and diamonds.
Chadbots also cant hit you.

>>39373784
Listen to this 6 seconds of a fembot

https://vocaroo.com/i/s1iKbhd6fAb6

Hello friends I also hate women

>>39385814
Not until you listen to that vocarroo I linked this is how they all think

>>39385422
I've been here since 09 and I care newfaggot.

>>39385804
Shes a slut 7 inch dick come on thats way above average

>>39385827
I can listen to it but I actually really hate women because they are selfish and entitled as fuck

>>39385804
There goes my chance I'm 5'8 and have a 5.5 penis

>>39385804
She is right though women don't want manlets and dicklets some of us are fucked from the start

>>39385864
U are not hopeless u just need lots of money and a drivers license

>>39385804
7" 5'8" here

I'll still make her submit

>>39380362
It is rape. Having sex with someone you don't want to because you are threatened with homelesness or starvation is rape.

Just like having to work for an employer because otherwise you face homelessness and starvation is slavery.

>>39380659
There will never be equality. Mostly because of men. Any female has at least one or two guys that would kill me and take my resources to give to her if requested/given the chance. Men don't have anyone who would give them whatever they could just for existing (and access to the hole).

>>39380696
You don't seem to get it? For this example I'll use biggers, since most of you are from /pol/ anyway. Why are people afraid of niggers? Because if statistics and shit. Same reason women are afraid of men. Women can basically site crime statistics against men and we end up looking like niggers statistics wise.

>>39385833
Ive been on this site since 06 and trip fag sometimes.
Newfag is something new fags say because their bantz are really shit.
I bet you are a women.

>>39386092
>It is rape. Having sex with someone you don't want to because you are threatened with homelesness or starvation is rape.
No it isnt you trade pussy for a hot meal.
No one lives for free.
>>39386092
>Just like having to work for an employer because otherwise you face homelessness and starvation is slavery.
No it isnt you trade hours of work for a hot meal and money.
no one lives for free loser.

File: 150091030109.jpg (579KB, 1299x1621px) Image search: [Google]

579KB, 1299x1621px

>>39386287
>Why are people afraid of niggers?
They shoot up places and rape stuff.

>>39381445
I'll start suicide bombing Forever 21s before I roll over for women.

>>39381733
>men had to go to wars started by other men to fight men

Seeing a pattern?

>>39386527
>Seeing a pattern?
Yeah women love fucking dudes who kill stuff dead.
When was the last time pre 2000s that a women wanted a lankey manlet with bad posture no muscles and bald?

>>39386420
>being forced to make a trade is voluntary

Yah okay.

File: Clueless Whore.png (403KB, 793x810px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 793x810px

Gonna start to dump my shit here anons.
1

File: BullettotheHead.jpg (269KB, 1262x849px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1262x849px

Nice cunty conversation between clams
2

File: Cheating cunts.png (256KB, 1800x1348px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1800x1348px

I don't remember introducing you to the cheating cunts.

File: Father's Day Cunt.png (173KB, 857x1639px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 857x1639px

Here is on of my favorites. The father's day cunts.
4

File: Polygraph cunt.png (121KB, 1112x919px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1112x919px

The polygraph cunt isn't bad as well.

File: Pregnant cunt.png (142KB, 1115x456px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1115x456px

This one is the preggy cunt... And she got a surprise for you.

File: Sweethearts.png (298KB, 839x2172px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 839x2172px

Here you can find the sweethearts... It all started so well.

>>39387085
Why marriage kills the sex life?

How much would a fully functional sexbit would cost? I am think around the price of a decent car so around $30k-$50k

>>39386805
No one is forcing a hooker to turn trick nice straw man, women.
She can choose to work as a hooker or a teacher.
She can also grow crops and hunt for food.
All of which take time and life energy.
>WAH LIFE IS NOT FAIR WAH.
Thats you.
Life sucks and then you die get over it.

File: 1501037040070.jpg (6KB, 148x149px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 148x149px

>>39387085

>This was around the time she changed her phone password, she told me it was to keep the kids out of it

Goddamn it if I don't know where this is headed

>>39373784
>If they had anything to offer but their pussies, we won't be making sexbots.

This doesn't make sense, if they can offer only pussy, why would we need pussy only robot?

File: TheCuntyCunt.png (156KB, 1027x985px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1027x985px

I have no name for this one, she is too hardcore for me... Hardcore cunt?

>>39387227
Thats the first fucking thing that proves a cunt is cheating.

File: 1503430528061.jpg (121KB, 520x588px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 520x588px

Also got a few shit like this

File: 1503689735393.jpg (273KB, 1456x1103px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1456x1103px

Different codes and roastie shits

>>39387272
Those reddit relationship questions are always either
1) Slut who was whoring away, wondering why her bf/husband left her
2) Guy who did nothing wrong, but still wondering what he did wrong, and how can he forgive, because he was brainwashed

File: 00458823.jpg (152KB, 979x663px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 979x663px

>>39387227
By the time you finish reading all the stories I posted, you will be cured, anon.

>>39387072
Once men settle in relationship they become feminine and lose their predator aura.

File: DSC00103.jpg (191KB, 1392x1600px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1392x1600px

Girl will cheat on you if you look like that.

>>39387337
I agree, and in most cases these reddit fools are nonredeemable. They're way too far gone.

>>39387466
>Girl will cheat on you
FTFY.

>>39387492
Not really. A lot of men cheat also. Sadly women fall in love with those cheaters rather than average ones.

>>39387517
>A lot of men cheat also
Chads do, sure.

>>39387553
Not only Chads (they do it more obviously) but even average/slightly above average ones if girl doesnt want to have sex or is too prudish.

>>39387583
If a roastie is not performing her duties she's useless, and they have my blessing to get it somewhere else.

>>39381581
Letting half your population die by opium abuse diminishes tax revenue, dumb cunt. But I don't suppose you thought that far.

>>39373919
Thats not really what very'' soon'' looks like, it reminds me of that episode from south park when randy tried to pay for an internet simulator.

>>39382738
>estonian women look chinese
Goddamit, the finnic peoples really are mongols

Roasties fundementally misunderstand the appeal of the robo-waifu. The creation of sexbots isn't the objectification women, it's the humanizing of objects.

Women are useless and have always been useless. When the argument comes to pregnancy, it's just as well; if some primal me decided we wanted a son, no woman is physically strong enough to deny me those fruits.

Problem with women today is they've become uppity. They take our male affinity for investment in our ventures as though it were cosmic ignorance. That sentiment is, itself, a gaping cosmic ignorance held by all women without exception.
Then, it's not the woman, but in fact the man who selects the desirable bearer of his offspring. This is by no means restricted to a single woman, although modern legislation seems to sanction polygamous men.

Women are like little bonsai trees. Their only duty is to sit there and be had. They are too shallow for either artistic or practical wisdom, and function on a matrix of manipulation and dishonesty that only the most proficient men can navigate unstung.

- The Burning of the Beef, by Milcon Lipson

>>39387705
I dont see why women would be that much against sexbots. Chads will have larger harems, betas will have their thing and continue contributing for society.

>>39387705
It's the de-pedestalizing of roasties. Look at this thread. It's full of panicking roasties pulling shit out of their asses. They realize time's up, even if not consciously yet.

>>39387730
Chads are sexually dominant but not necessarily socially or financially. Their resources are still limited. Chad baristas' harem is not as nice as having beta the engineer provide for you.

>>39374444
Those are some great numbers, anon.

>tfw smart enough to work on AI but already behind the curve (only a college sophomore)
>tfw want a qt wifebot more than anything

>a literal army of beings that could easily be outfitted with weapons and turned against any imaginable force being stopped by a bunch of cunts with signs
Really forces you to ponder