We need to talk about the vaginal jew

You spend entirely too much time mingling with ignorant shitapes and drinking their delusional koolaid. You know that, right?

>>39362989
t. shitape

>>39362931
It's very convenient to blame these complex outcomes solely on women, but it's only half correct at best.

The rise of socialism has mostly been possible because of women's suffrage, this is true. But only because women's suffrage atomised the voting power of the family and distributed it to the individual.

Ideally women's suffrage could be retained of only married women elected as leaders of a household could vote. Likewise for men.
During the sole franchise of men, this was achieved without intent.

Without policy being shaped by family concerns, socialist tendency was a natural inevitably.

I suggest you think about this in more detail than merely pointing blame solely at women.

It's not just women who support immigration, though. It's something boomers mostly supported because they were oblivious to how good things were for them. I'd also argue that being anti-immigrant is gynocentic. All gynocentrism is basically men within a particular society with some status, being willing to go along with women in trampling other men (ousiders to the state).

You see this most clearly with the use of the word "rapefugee" - while it's true that men coming from those regions are statistically more likely to rape than western men, only a tiny tiny percentage of those refugees\immigrants will ever rape - and not all male immigrants should be treated like shit just because they're male. So much right-wing opposition to immigration is based on this willingness to trample other males. While yes it's true men have more to lose - because competition for jobs is increased and men need jobs the most, and most victims of violent crime are male, this doesn't justify misandry.

>>39363136
I appreciate the comment, posted the same thread on /pol/ 5 minutes ago and it got only 1 comment while they discuss game of thrones. R9K is now literally more intellectual than pol.

>>39363246
>It's not just women who support immigration
OP here.
Nowhere in the thread did I suggest women should change/do something. I suggest that men stop gynocentrism by not blatantly pandering to women, even on 4chan.

>>39362931
When will red pill white men on /pol/ stop pandering to women?
>Never.
Its cool that they took some red pill but it was probably constipation medicine, not the red pill of truth as in matrix. If they took that one they would know that there is no use in fighting for society, country, religion, (and especially) women. I wonder which of those would fuck you up and exploit you more.
I agree with most of what you said OP but i fear you still live in an illusion that this women pandering will stop.
> It won't
At least not before islam takes over, then maybe we will have some order

File: 64ab4bdac35f26af0f78278bd4794a3486e922ee1a4704f4d08ca2b33d24e5f3.png (100KB, 260x194px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 260x194px

>>39363512
> i fear you still live in an illusion that this women pandering will stop
I don't, Anon, the point of this thread is that we collectively reach exactly this conclusion. You win the thread.

>>39363136
good post

Women have lower agency and are very susceptible to the negative pressures of popular culture, but once they are married to a man of good character they can become a very positive influence on their children and the world.

Restricting the vote to only the married would be an incredible leap forwards. Democracy might be more sustainable under those rules. But universal suffrage to all above a certain (young) age, as we have across the west, has been a terrible mistake.

>>39363136
>>39363679
I wasnt going to say anything but not only do you reek of the purple pill your reddit spacing is also offensive.

It works both ways though OP, in fact as a White Western male you have an advantage

you can travel to any third world country easily and fuck girls with very little effort

Even with our SJWs pushing immigration it's still pretty difficult for most third worlders to immigrate here and most of them struggle to actually get a white woman

Work to your strengths, go to Asia or Latin America and fuck the local girls until your ego soars through the roof

>>39362931
Do you realize that not every single woman out there supports taking in immigrants? In a country like Italy that is not that westernized (compared to UK, Sweden), there's probably a decent amount of women that wouldn't mind if they lined up the nogs and shot them, or at least threw them back in the water. If you realize that, then it should answer your question.

>>39363679
So gays can't vote?

?


?

>>39363764
>you can travel to any third world country easily and fuck girls with very little effort
Dont post your obvious roastie logic on /R9K/.
>leave your country if you dont like women voting for socialism in yours
KYS

>>39363794
No.
If you aren't actively contributing to the the next generation of society, you're a fucking tourist, and you don't get to decide shit.
Adopt or you're a guest.

>>39363794
That would be a good thing, yeah. Gays, trannies, cat women, shouldn't have the franchise.

>>39363831
So if you adopt and you're gay you can vote ? That's a yes to gay marriage then right?

>>39363764
Procreating with third worlders leads to disadvantaged children.
Only an idiot would do this, only a malicious advocate of genocide would seriously suggest it.

>>39363831
nigger-san, I proudly refer you to this Anons post:
>>39363512
>>39363576

>>39362931
I live in NYC. Every time I hear a call for help from a white woman, I ignore it. I hope they all get raped and die. Every woman here is a far-left whore so let them suffer the consequences of their lifestyle choices. I keep my head down when a white woman gets beaten for whatever reason by a black guy, or when she is about to get kidnapped. Fuck em.

>>39363863
Yeah sure.
Ideally in a free society, homosexually is understood as a choice and it loses its stigma, and with suitable oversight gay couples can adopt and raise children.
You'd cast the vote per household unit.

>>39363865
hey, they're trying to genocide us too, an eye for an eye and all that

File: jp.png (59KB, 220x262px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 220x262px

>>39363918
T H I S
H
I
S

It has to get a lot worse before it gets better.

>>39363971
It's your genocide you dummy.
Only white women can have white children.

>>39364031

genocide

noun

the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular nation or ethnic group.

>>39364522
And if everyone has mixed children, where's the fucking ethnic group gone retard?

>>39364571
Into the new one. Are you a fucking racist bigot!?! Fuck off to /pol/

Always know that it's happening regardless of if you want it or not. Not a single thing anybody can do to stop black sperm from fertilizing white wombs.

>>39364571
Who is KILLING the ethnic group dumbo?

>>39364650
Whoever is giving incentive to racemixing.
Should be clear.

If you wipe an ethnic group off the face of the earth, it's genocide, and arguing semantics over whether it's done by blade or by relying on human mortality is sophistry.

>>39364723
But it isn't genocide if it isn't intentional and enforced by someone.

>>39364861
We don't say that only Hitler was responsible for the Holocaust.
We say everyone complicit with the Nazi regime was responsible.

If someone's complicit with an ethnic group being demographically erased, what does that logically make them?

File: 1501100084948546.jpg (240KB, 1618x301px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 1618x301px

>>39362931
Some cold hard facts.

>>39362989
But Mr Lahey!

>>39363779
Do you realize that every single woman out there supports taking in immigrants? In a country like Italy which is westernized (like The U. K. and Sweden), there isn't a single woman who wants to have them lined up and shot, nor any who want to throw them back in the water. If you realize that, then that should answer your question. -Fixed

Honestly, what are we going to do about it? We are the NEETs, outcasts, and virgins. The west will keep chugging along this masochistic path until something drastic happens. Events change people not reason, data or civil discussion. At the end of the day, the west values individual liberties too much to implement the things you are suggesting like removing women's suffurage. We either wait for the happening or we just do what >>39363764 and start migrating to other countries and accept defeat so to speak. Even that is a dead end, because many foreign countries are quite collectivistic and would shut down mass migration when they see it.

>>39365406
Even if this was true, it wouldn't be fixed at all, you tard.