i made a grill account in POF to see what my competition was

>>39336137
Using online dating, yeah absolutely give up. Total waste of time if you're under 40.

File: 1495611407082.jpg (38KB, 503x644px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 503x644px

>>39336137
Yeah, its a rigged game. Even below average girls can all go hook up with chad now while average males are left to starve.
I've had profiles on dating websites before, complete with best possible photo of myself, and non-autistic description. You can bet that I've never recieved a single message before, and any attempts to message females never got anywhere in the end.

Average men simply aren't desirable. Thats all there is to it.

File: wew2.png (39KB, 1012x196px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1012x196px

>>39336190
>>39336295
welp, its not like im going to be getting a gf outside so wizard status here we go

>>39336424
Try meeting people who share your interests.
You're right about going outside, because who the fuck goes outside if you're this deep into internet memes. There's no one with your interests who you can meet by going outside.
Better use your head.

>>39336137

Can you show us the girl pic? Maybe your idea of average isnt so average

File: Screenshot_2017-08-27-12-10-48.png (105KB, 480x854px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 480x854px

>>39336137
Try Kik instead, it's fun and if you're ever deprived of attention you can use it to talk to some randoms in there who'll actually try to care just because you're a girl who they want to fuck.

>>39336137
theyre literally all trannys, that is my experience

File: 18313.png (770KB, 688x840px) Image search: [Google]

770KB, 688x840px

>>39336446
i meant that im a NEET who hasnt spoken face to face with a stranger in about a year, not that i wont find women that could be potential gfs
>>39336483
i think she's pretty average, maybe just slightly above average. but then again most guys will rate women higher. what do you think?

>>39336559
wtf that's a man and it's disgusting

>>39336559
looks like a fucking tranny

>>39336574
>>39336583
well if this is how the competition i have to deal with when some of them look like trannys then i just dont know what else to say.
on a somewhat unrelated note i thought that women where the ones that did all those cliche, overused dog filter pictures and selfies while laying down on the bed, but i see almost every other guy has a picture like that as well

>>39336295
Your profile was shit, like 80% of male profiles. It's easy to find girls online. You just need to spend a few minutes creating a not-shit profile. Most men fail this step, like you did.

>>39336666

Those are called "fuqbois" anon
And actually a tranny would get more attention than an average girl.
The get gays(male and female),bisexuals, and chasers

>>39336559
Yeah ur assessment is fair that's an average.
Btw get a fucking job or you'll be stuck with underdeveloped personality for a long time.

>>39336695
Post some adequate male profiles and I'll show you how they're professionally photographed. Refer to the chart in >>39336295 for how your perception of adequate is warped.

File: 1489934772134.jpg (20KB, 314x305px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 314x305px

>>39336137
now post your face

>>39336732
You make the elementary mistake of thinking those rankings are universal. The opposite is true. That chart shows that girls find about 50% of men decent to attractive. But it's a different 50% to every girl.

>>39336695
>like 80% of male profiles
well dont forget that female profiles are just as bad or even worse. taking it from POF alone, almost all of the female profiles is "just ask :)" or "add me on snap chat: whore1995" and thats literally it. not to mention the whole "i love going on adventures and im fluent in sarcasm XD" copy pasted cliche

>>39336732
You probably took one selfie in the basement wearing sweatpants. Have someone take a picture of you outside doing something and you'll get hits.

>>39336775
You are an utter prat who doesn't know what he is talking about

"Make a non shit profile it's easy"

You utter twat

>>39336764
You made a whole post out of nonsense. Amazing.
The chart shows a strong negative skew with regards to women's evaluation of men's attractiveness when compared to men's evaluation of women's attractiveness.
It does not show any sign that the implication cannot be universal. It does not show that
>The opposite is true
whatever you meant by this.
It shows that 50% of men are found decent to attractive by women, when by the same standard, men find 90% of women decent to attractive. This represents a strong skew in the distribution.

Post adequate male profiles like you were asked to please.

>>39336824
The only thing that matters is when they actually go on dates or fuck. Statistics like this are only wishful thinking. If girls find 50% of men unattractive, how come 99% of men are having sex?

>>39336848
Cite your sources on that last one.