How much better would this site be if you had to be 25+ to post?

I think it'd be alot better. No /b, no pol, no summer kids

it'd be better if normies were not allowed to post

"better" is subjective. It would probably be a lot more sterile. The young'uns saying the dumbest shit.

It would be exactly the same because all the underage shits would post anyways.

>>39289363
It'd have better conversations and better green text stories. Too many contrarians, and politics and BS threads that provide no real topic

There isn't really any way to enforce such a rule, though. Even now, plenty of children under the age of 18 browse and post all over this website. They're only banned if they foolishly admit to their age. It'd be the same regardless of the age limit.

>>39289176
Worse, and here's why.
When all posts are excellent, no posts are excellent.
It's necessary for fucking idiots to post unfortunately.

It would be like wizchan or metafilter (failed normies).

>>39289176
90% of 4chan culture grows from pedophiles and similar people who want to corrupt the youth, so to speak. everything after that is fallout.

>>39289176
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMALuEYxK6U
Time changes nothing to it; when you're dumb, you're dumb.