Pedophilia

A child can not give consent.
Why? Because it is a fucking CHILD.
Go see a doctor, you disgusting piece of shit.

Ancient greeks did it. Literally.

A child can not give consent.
Why? Because it is a fucking CHILD.
Go see a doctor, you disgusting piece of shit. Originality

Children can't give consent, they are incapable of understanding cause and effect, and don't understand the consequences of their actions.

Young girls especially are really nice. Unless and until they are hurt or exploited by someone. I feel like every child has the right to grow up without having to worry about sex.

That would explain why Greeks today are such shitstains.

A child can not give consent.
Why? Because it is a fucking CHILD.
Go see a doctor, you disgusting piece of shit.
sick fucker, kys please

File: 1503367378248.png (425KB, 805x579px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 805x579px

It's almost like the microsecond you become 18 years old your brain is automatically capable of understanding basic human functions

File: 1453877525-667612bcdf9d560e1848247ad08b4a6f.jpg (66KB, 892x666px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 892x666px

Molesting children is fine. They're stupid and don't contribute anything so you can just treat them like animals. If you think molesting children is bad, but you happily eat animals, you're head is all fucked up. The strong are always entitled to do what they want with the weak.

>>39237249
yes its bad

children can't consent they don't understand sex

go jerk off to 2d anime girls instead

File: 1439347024439.jpg (46KB, 421x427px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 421x427px

>>39237249
>if the child consents

>>39237482
If you rape a child you're not strong because you're putting yourself in danger.
Enjoy prison while I sit comfortably safe at my desk sipping a nice cold drink faggot

>>39237474
It's gotta start somewhere, dickhead.

>>39237474
Gotta draw the line somewhere. There's a point where we've determined that you've had every opportunity to get everything out of life you can with people helping and protecting you and that it's time for you to have the freedom to make and accept the consequences of your own actions. That's 18 years old. Until then, we have a responsibility to sort of guide you into not being a criminal or a drain on resources, or a tool to be exploited or taken advantage of. It's got nothing to do with what you understand, it has to do with society's responsibility to you.

>like if the child consents
this is why pedophiles need to be chemically castrated
what fucking part about a child cannot consent do you not understand? no matter what your sick fucked up brain makes you think to justify it, NO child can consent to sex

>>39237482
I never said molesting children, I said safe consensual sex. I'm not even a pedo it's just although experiment.

>>39237489
yeah but if they did? I'm talking about the ideal situation here.

>>39237459
>>39237415
>>39237380
?

>>39237431
yeah but if it was a child that could

Let me rephrase the question, if there was a kid who understood sex, understood consequences of his actions, wanted to have sex with a trusted adult and they both consented would it be okay?

>>39237474
who said anything about 18?
OP said child, pedophilia. Try looking up the definition of those words

File: 1500342475778.jpg (46KB, 400x328px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 400x328px

>>39237249
HMMM LEMME THINK

NOPE

Also enjoy the ban, nigger.

>>39237542
It's true you have to draw the line somewhere, but 18 is too high. 14-15 is more appropriate. They still going to have sex at that age, so the law just makes some people get in trouble for no reason.

>>39237549
if a big meteor crashed into the earth right now what would you do xDD
retarded theoretical thread where you will change the scenario until you get the replies you want, sage

File: 1501084470920.gif (2MB, 256x192px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 256x192px

>>39237249
It ruins peoples lives asshole, plain and simple.

>>39237549
>yeah but if they did? I'm talking about the ideal situation here.

they can't

>>39237474

this

why are children supposed to all be too retarded to give consent. meanwhile some full grown adults still don't know the repercussions of sex.

if you're making these meme arguments you're literally just regurgitating whatever you've heard about it before because you can't think of a legitimate argument as to why kids can't consent.

>>39237569
ban? bitch have you used this site you can't get fucking banned for talking about pedophilia.

>>39237549
If children fully understood sex, and it was legal and consensual then yeah it's perfectly fine to fuck a child.

I never understood the "child can't consent" meme. Consent just means they agree to peforming sex or whatever you're planning on doing together. I personally think as long as someone has or has had a desire to have sex, then a relationship should be legal. The problem with setting an age of consent is that everyone reaches puberty at different ages ergo has sexual fantasies as different ages. I do believe that "underage" adolescents should have parental approval because they are the legal guardian until whatever age their state recognizes them being an adult. I started watching porn, or rather reading porn when I was 11. I knew what sex was and would think about, so if I met someone I was into and the feelings be mutual, as long as my parents approved there shouldn't be any restrictions. I am male just to clarify. What's wrong with it is that it's just a taboo in our society.

>>39237544
We used to say that women couldn't make decisions for themselves, but look how the times have changed. I'll have my cock in your daughter before you can say democracy.

>>39237544
This.

No point responding to you, OP, if you can't help but ask even still if a child can consent. You're too far gone.

Still wouldn't hurt to get some help.

No,but having sexual relations with a teen {14-17} is fine. Teens can not be tricked like a kid can. They know what they are getting into. Especially 16 year olds. If a 16 year old wants to have sex she should at least have it with an adult that knows what he is doing,not some snott nosed boy who will most likely get her pregnant.

>>39237544
>because I say so
Nice argument faggot

>>39237625
I shouldnt have to argue it. Any non-pedo with a sane mind knows how a child's mind works. I'm not arguing with the mentally ill, I'd never win. I just hope you never have unsupervised access to children.

>>39237249
i will give her my trust on a deep level.

File: balding star trek guy.jpg (28KB, 768x768px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 768x768px

>>39237249
>if the child consents
this is where you fucked up

>>39237549
No, it would not be okay. Every child should grow up without worrying about sexual relationships and the health and emotional consequences thereof. And we even let them have sex with each other because we know we can't stop them, but people with a duty to protect them, like parents, teachers, or much older people, are often prohibited from having sex with children of any age or children under their care because the children should be focused on learning and growing up and being a positive, contributing member of society, not prey.
>>39237571
For you too, often it's not illegal for two 14 year olds to have sex, for the same reasons - they don't understand the consequences of their actions. The don't understand cause and effect. However, having sex with someone who does is often illegal because that person should be protecting them, not preying on them.

File: hell_of_burning_fury_pepe.jpg (40KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 500x500px

>>39237249
This is bait.
But I'm gonna take it anyway.
If anyone actually thinks this way, then please kys.
It's wrong because they aren't sexually developed. Scientifically, there's no logical reasoning behind having sex with a child.
It's wrong because you're taking away from their freedom to find a mate that suits them best. If you offer sex, a child may take it SOLEY because they're ignorant. They will regret it later in life.
OP, and anyone else like this, you've got mental problems associated with a desire for dominance. Children are the weakest humans, other than the mentally handicapped. You are fucked in the head because you want control.
And, just so we're clear, if you ever commit a crime like this, you're gonna pay. It might not be by my hand, but judgement day will certainly punish you in time.

>>39237549
>Let me rephrase the question, if there was a kid who understood sex, understood consequences of his actions, wanted to have sex with a trusted adult and they both consented would it be okay?
no kid can do that.

Or let me explain, there is people that are "grown up" at 14, and can totaly understand their actions and be good people, and there is people that still are childish at 25 (this board is filled with them)
But in general, people can assume their responsabilities areond 18, and thus law decided it s the age ppl can start having sex because you are supposed to "have gown up" and be able to understand the consequences of your action.
Even if some kids could still develop themselves and be good after having sex as a child, it s not recommended because it s only a small percentage.
That s why law is for.

sry for bed english.

>>39237647
Nice ad hominem, not an argument. You should be able to support your argument and not have your only support being because you say so. Why can a child not consent. And I'm defining child as anyone who is capable of producing sperm or having functional ovaries

A woman cannot give consent.
Why? Because it is a fucking WOMAN.
Go see a doctor, you disgusting piece of shit.

>>39237249
It's not consent because they don't know what they're consenting to.

In no delusional world a child will willing let you do that to them. Nope.

File: 1499373260915.jpg (34KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x500px

>ITT: Sandniggers trying to justify their religion
Really makes the brain cells scramble.

>>39237647

"kids cant consent bc I say so and I don't even have to justify my argument to anyone who thinks differently because le strawman"

off yourself faggot

>>39237482
Nothing tougher than putting your Richard in somebody half your age and half your size because they're exactly that.

Save, that is, for posting on R9K - fucking tough guy central, and with your shitty children's show reaction image to boot.

Genuinely kill yourself, brother. There can't be a thing you're doing for our species.

>>39237682
>white
>not a pedo

really activates me almonds

>>39237672
>>39237683
im not arguing with pedos. ad hominem and strawman dont apply because I'm not arguing.

>>39237672
>And I'm defining child as anyone who is capable of producing sperm or having functional ovaries
That's not what a child is

>>39237661

only argument that made sense. thanks for not shitting up the discussion with more 'its a CHILD DUMB DUMB GO SEE A DOCTUM"

>>39237699
>it's not arguing if I say I am not arguing
Actually kill yourself faggot. If you can't support an argument don't bother sticking your nose into discussions where people are being serious.

>>39237695
>Muh morals
Cry me a river, boy. Maybe one day you'll see the light and go fuck a little brat to celebrate.

>>39237696
The joke here is all whites are racist,sexist,pedophiles and God freaks. Yeah yeah we get it. Lol.

>>39237712
I started cumming at 12. Are 12 year olds not children?

>>39237712
>hurr my subjective defition of child is correct and yours is wrong
That's not how definitions work retard. There is no objective age span for the word "child." Would you say an 11 year old was a child? Because I was able to ejaculate at that age.

>>39237699
>Gets called out for being a dumbass
>"I WASN'T AGUING YOU PEDOFAG FUCKING KYS XD"

>>39237726
I can post whatever I want, how do you plan to stop me? Stay salty mentally ill cuck

>>39237622
Teens have a better idea of things, but they still can't grasp long term consequences. A 14 year old might understand what sex is and may even want to do it, but they can't understand that by doing it, they may be causing themselves mental/emotional/physical issues down the road.

Really, even 18 is too young for that, but you can't make the age of consent something like 20-25 when people fully develop. Though at the same time then I think consent age should be 16.

>>39237751
>>39237771
>a 7 year old is not a child because they can't produce sperm

>>39237786
>hurr stay mad
Who's mad? Stop being a child and quit assuming that someone's upset because they don't agree with you.

>>39237808
>still not understanding definitions
How about you get back to the point. Or have you realized you failed at arguing your first point and are trying to shift the focus somewhere else

>>39237809
Well then why don't YOU shut the fuck UP you God damn RETARDED FAGGOT?? You are nothing but a STUPID DUMB ASS!!!!

>>39237797
That is indeed agreeable honestly.

>>39237751
>>39237771
Your definition is literally retarded because according to it adults are children too, whereas an 11 year old who doesn't produce sperm or ovaries isn't. Use wikipedia if you can't even define "child", then come back here and try to have a real discussion.

>>39237859
give me another (You) plox :^)

Assuming this isn't just low quality bait, the reason it's wrong is ultimately down to consequences. Victims of pedophiles come out of it totally fucked up, often for life.
Your hypothetical consent scenario assumes children are capable of such consent without being manipulated. This is more plausible for, say, two 15 year olds who have sex together which is why they are unlikely to be prosecuted (at least where I'm from), but if you're a 30yo with a 15yo you're being manipulative.

File: 1503317411973.jpg (78KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1024x576px

>>39237884
>Wikipedia
>Mfw

>>39237884
I see you're going to abandon your point in a desperate attempt to prove yourself right. Even then you're still a fucking retard because I can easily define "adult" as someone who has finished developing. And the two wouldn't be able to be used interchangably.

>>39237910
I would disagree because both a 15 year old and 30 year old are capable of manipulation and rape. There are a lot, and I mean a lot of news reports on teenagers raping and molesting other teenages. If a 15 year old falls in love with someone much old I see no problem with it.

>>39237910
im not talking about victims i mean if the child wants sex

what if the child initiated the sex?

>>39237911
im sick of this fucking wikipedia isn't reliable source meme

>>39237923
>I see you're going to abandon your point in a desperate attempt to prove yourself right
No idea what you're talking about bruh, I just entered the discussion because I got triggered by your abhorrent definition

>Even then you're still a fucking retard because I can easily define "adult" as someone who has finished developing. And the two wouldn't be able to be used interchangably.

Let's say for the moment that children aren't adults, and adults aren't children. hence, since you defined children as "anyone who is capable of producing sperm or having functional ovaries", adults cannot produce sperms and cannot have functioning ovaries. From that consequence alone you should see that your definition is defunctional, since it obviously doesn't fit 99,99% of the population's notion of an adult. And this isn't even the only problem that this definition has.

>>39237962
A 15 year old's definition of love and a 30 year old's definition of love aren't even close to being the same thing. Meanwhile, don't you want 15 year old's focusing on being good citizens and being responsible members of society? Instead of their relationships with men a generation older?

>>39237249
I thought the fist was on the forehead...

As long as thier the same age I don't really care