Trash Can Of Normieology

>>38884105
You're right but no one will ever acknowledge this because normalfags lose their shit when you drop brutal truth on their stupid fucking heads. Prepare to have your wisdom forgotten for all eternity just because people don't like it.

>>38884105
i though everyone on this board knew this already

>>38884266
You sometimes gotta spell it out for posterity's sake if for nothing else.

Just a heads up
If you participate in this retarded circlejerk of a thread, you're deluding yourself and you know it

File: 1501804667618.jpg (30KB, 641x482px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 641x482px

>>38884345
Just a heads up
You have literally no argument and you never will

>>38884383
1. implying your fat ass is a systematic loser and that your failures are entirely not your own
2. implying anyone believes society is fair, equal, and rational
3. trying to poke holes in the "normie" worldview, which is by the way a beautiful strawman, accomplishes nothing for anyone and only serves to give you a false sense of superiority. it's fucking pathetic

this thread is literally just a circlejerk for you faggots to act like it matters that you know anything about how much of a loser you are when it doesn't change how much of a loser you are. and to act smart because le zizek lol!!

I'd probably be better able to deal with being alone if people would acknowledge it was largely out of my control, rather than implying it is due to some sort of moral failure on my part.

>>38884449
do you see what you're doing? you're just looking for validation by posting this. How is anyone supposed to judge whether or not this is accurate when you use your anonymity as a shield? For all anyone knows you're an incompetent shitstain who deserves everything you get, but you can just pretend to act like you did everything you were supposed to and it's not your fault, and it suddenly becomes true for your internet persona and impossible to consider thoughtfully. This is why this place is such a shithole and a quicksand pit of despair for people like you.

>>38884537
lmao fuck off nerd

File: 1468717025489.png (108KB, 400x407px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 400x407px

>>38884425
Textbook projection. I don't believe that I am anything but a failure, and I certainly am not looking to rehabilitate my self-esteem. If anything, posting on r9k only worsens it, thanks in large part to posters like yourself who just want to vilify people.

I mean your entire post only confirms the rhetoric of OP. It reeks of moral sanctimony and the only real identifiable argument you gave there is that the "normie" OP talks about is a strawman. It isn't. It's worse in other places but even on this very board you see plenty of posters literally say you've just got to "stop being a misogynist" or "improve your personality" if you want success with women, when neither of the two really have anything particularly to do with the endeavor. We're not all evil. Just fugly.

>>38884425
I'm Op. Not that anon.
>1. implying your fat ass is a systematic loser and that your failures are entirely not your own
Saying something is systematic does not imply that I don't believe in personal responsibility, No one would argue that being born in a shitty neighborhood means you're not more likely to commit crime You can't rule out upbringing. Calling someone a fat ass proves my point since you immediately try to find a smoking gun that would fit in your world view.
>implying anyone believes society is fair, equal, and rational
True but few would outright admit liberalism is just a shroud for a new class hierarchy.
>3
Not an argument.

File: 2A6AFA7D00000578-0-image-a-31_1436564278563.jpg (84KB, 634x634px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 634x634px

>>38884425
>2. implying anyone believes society is fair, equal, and rational
Nobody SAYS they believe it, in fact many will explicitly deny it, but scores of retards SHOW they believe it in their arguments and actions. Classic example: people post pictures like this all the time (relatively ugly guy, normal looking girl) to chastise robots. They assume that this guy must be with her because he's got some great quality to compensate - charisma, a fuckton of money, dominance/social capital, he's a really "good person", whatever. What they don't consider for even a second is the prospect that he's a poor, boring piece of shit too. "She wouldn't be with him if it were like that." How do you know? Oh.