Do roastie's have any argument to back up their gender other

>Nothing unique other than their bodies
>Not true! We make life! With our bodies!
I know a lot of women are dumb, but come on...

it's pretty funny, when men tout that women have nothing to offer than giving life they are basically admitting that men offer nothing

a male is basically a female that can't give birth and there is nothing a male can offer that a female can't

>>38859627
Can men create life?

File: 1499399298894.jpg (31KB, 300x451px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x451px

You have to be female in order to pilot Mechagodzilla.

>>38859686
Agh! My lip! Someone help me take this hook out!

>>38859707
Yes, by using a womans body

>>38859749
Or artificial wombs
>tfw women will be obsolete within your lifetime

WOW, women give birth. Big fucking deal. Men build cars, have stamina, and don't have to worry about getting pregnant plus we're unemotional, logical, better at pretty much everything and we have less smelly and better looking genitalia. All women exist to do is annoy us and reject us, meanwhile we're too busy building rocketships and curing new diseases. But they can give birth. Whoopdy doo. So can my hamster, Lady Mcbeth. There's nothing you can do that a man cant roasties.

>>38859627
We produce eggs

>>38859763
artificial wombs will be super expensive though... artificial sperm is already available and extremely cheap to produce

males were already completely disposable but now they aren't even needed for their dime-a-barrel sperm

>We don't kill eachother over stupid shit because of our insecure male egos
>We have nurturing instincts, not destructive instincts
>Basically, we're not a literal cancer on the planet

#KillAllMen

>>38859819
Yeah! Now if you could just create artificial engineers, scientists, leaders, administrators, artists and civilisation builders in general, you could finally be rid of those pesky male parasites.

>>38859850
good thing there are already millions of female engineers, scientists, leaders ect

we won't completely get rid of the male parasites, just 98% of them

>>38859820
>We don't kill eachother over stupid shit because of our insecure male egos
Because you're weak. You're incapable of doing so.

>We have nurturing instincts, not destructive instincts
You're more selfish by far, and you're too weak to be destructive.
#GasAllWomen

>>38859883
>womeninstem.jpeg

File: CEUowIwWMAAVbuo.jpg (36KB, 600x391px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 600x391px

>tfw you just saw r9k become tumblr

File: image.jpg (47KB, 424x330px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 424x330px

>>38859883
>millions
>out of billions

>>38859883
Shame women could only be useful in a society men created in the first place. It's like the concept of communism. Shit idea and the closest it could get to working is if it starts in an already capitalist country

>>38859820
>Demand a lifestyle that can't be maintained without subjugating most of the Earth
>liek oh em geee why are men always killing each other??1?

>>38859897
Come back with a real argument, brainlet.

>Me male, me so strong! Me cum in 2 minutes and cry when you leave me!

Heh. Pathetic.

>>38859784
be my egg producing gf to love
over easy are best

>>38859775
>tfw reading this while I am more physically fit, more successful and make more money than all of the men I know

Fembots dont exist and women arent welcome on 4chan

>>38859627
No one has anything unique the gender brings to the table aside from the base biological function- and traps can't even do that. Innovation can be done only be the top 1% of humanity, male or female, and even then it requires education and space and money, which women haven't had throughout history. Pretty much everyone just continues on humanity in the hope of that 1% doing something.

>>38859981
>more physically fit

You can bench press 100kgs and do 25 wide grip heaves? Doubt it.

You probably think doibg squats in yoga pants makes you a 'fit girl'. Go wash out your cunt.

>>38859981
How fitted are you?

>>38859945
imagine how much nicer society would have been if women created it... but fortunately physical strength no longer matters and we can live as we are meant to

File: 1500687624019.jpg (42KB, 366x286px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 366x286px

>women expect a fucking trophy for doing their sole biological function
It's funny how they act so proud about it then go right around and moan like pregnancy is such a sickness and children are parasites.

>>38860048
>and we can live as we are meant to
You mean killing each other over purses and Chads?

>>38860048
Doesn't matter yet you still can't get over your biological instincts and continue to act like overgrown children. This applies to every thing from what you're attracted to to how you communicate. Very sad.

the only reason men commit more crimes than women is because women are physically weak

File: 1456005270607.jpg (891KB, 1560x2744px) Image search: [Google]

891KB, 1560x2744px

>>38860048
Indeed, I can barely imagine how wonderful that would be.

>>38860031

Well physical strength doesn't equal fitness, my 300lbs friend who eats nachos all day can lift a couch while I obviously can't. I have 9% bodyfat, rhr of 52, can run for miles before feeling tired and feel pretty okay about that. When it comes to men though all I see are guts and man titties.

This thread is valid in the sense that women have only had substantial freedom for roughly 100 years. All the major science and engineering that allowed for women to be supported has been male cultivated.
They are still in a juvenile stage for societal development and merely copy or rebel like teens towards males.

File: image.png (745KB, 1075x1144px) Image search: [Google]

745KB, 1075x1144px

>>38859949
>Come back with a real argument, brainlet.
I posted a series of flawless arguments that destroyed your assertions.
You responded with a meme and an insult. Your bravado is amusing.

>Me male, me so strong!
We are strong in almost every fascet.
Got anything to back it up or are you just going to respond with some Amy Schumer-tier "humor"?

>Me cum in 2 minutes and cry when you leave me!
Oh...
1. I would never fuck you or anything remotely like you, you stupid cow.
1. It takes me at least 15 minutes and 3 of my girlfriend's orgasms for a "quicky"
3.Your callous, whorish behavior is not only a refutation of your "nurturing instincts," but a habit that will damn you in the future, when you're old, fat and looking for a date.

>>38860158
>9% bodyfat
>woman
kek

>>38860158
>run
>jog slowly
Not the same

>>38860206
I also forgot to mention that many societies still have women in subservient positions and still operate on par with "equal" nation's.

File: image.jpg (39KB, 242x227px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 242x227px

>>38860031
>Go wash out your cunt.

>>38860140
Examples of men making shitty non-functioning societies exist all over Africa. Niggers, and spics can't do what white men can.

They're equally human

>>38859981
>Key word the ones you know

File: mate.jpg (41KB, 324x349px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 324x349px

>>38860086
>>38860140
please don't be upset just remind yourselves that you are excess flesh and nothing you think or feel matters

To be fair, women only had the kind of financial and societal freedom men had in the last 100 years. Prior to that, they had no space to develop anything, and all of the stuff that was really significant was discovered by men already. They couldn't do what men have done over the ages, and now there's a lot less to figure out.

I hate that people take these threads seriously. There's facts that prove men are better. No need to argue that. Any argument with a female WILL result in her mentioning something about you not getting sex or some other shit that has to do with some hole on their body. That's it. That's all they have. Stop arguing with them, no one gains anything.

Reading this thread makes me welcome our future robot overlords.

>>38860274
If they were that great they could overthrow the men or at least prove their worth

>>38860207
Would you kindly link the post in which these "flawless arguments" are contained?

As far as I can tell, you're simply another insecure, ego-driven boychild stroking himself to fantasies on an online image board.

>>38860257
>Niggers, and spics can't do what white men can.
... And no women can do what white men can

>>38860296
>If they were that great they could overthrow the men or at least prove their worth
No one can overthrow anyone in this hyper connected political system, and previously it required some physical superiority, and they have been working on every major project undertaken by man,

>>38860319
I agree that they can't

>>38860286
>That's it. That's all they have.
>they have everything a man does only with this additional ability, that's all they have

>>38859883
Name one successful matriarchal society. I'll save you the trouble: there have never been any.

>>38860274
>Marie Curie, arguably the most important female scientist to ever exist, was born in 1867

>>38860158
>When it comes to men though all I see are guts and man titties.
What retarded nigger viscinity are you from?

File: 8689267100101726244?account_id=8.jpg (11KB, 228x221px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 228x221px

>>38860341
>they have everything a man does

>>38860328
Blacks became the primary political power in South Africa in the 1900s. Look how things are going now.

The whole argument is such a "what if" scenario that it's stupid. Sure, men did a lot. Whether that was because of innate superiority or because they subjugated everyone else is a moot point, and the fact that other races and women couldn't do those things because of being oppressed for most of humanity is again, impossible to know.
What bearing does it have on the here and now? It's not like every white man is equal to Newton or Einstein, nor do they have any claim to their achievements as their own. Most are just average people. What matters is now, not who was historically better or worse, or what the reasons were therein.

>>38860346
males are physically stronger so a matriarchal society can't exist from the get-go, however if you look up the best countries of the world they are more feminist as you go higher

>>38860349
Yeah, and she was an outlier, and societies rules around women were slackening by then anyway.

>>38860412
>if you look up the best countries in the world they are more pondering as they go higher
So this...is the power...of women..

>>38860383
What does that have to do with women? Or the modern era?

>>38859775
Yes. MEN do all of those things. Meanwhile; robots sit in their mothers' basements jacking off to gay porn and wallowing in their butt-tears over what utter losers they are. Quit trying to ride on the coat-tails of achievers just because they also happen to have dicks. Regardless of what value women have or don't have relative to men, they have FAR more value than robots; who literally do nothing but take up space.

File: image.jpg (38KB, 526x437px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 526x437px

>>38860307
>Would you kindly link the post in which these "flawless arguments" are contained?
Find it yourself, you lazy cunt.

>As far as I can tell, you're simply another insecure, ego-driven
You're right on both accounts here, and there's nothing wrong with either of these things. Insecurity and ego hone our abilities and accomplishments, although, being a woman, I'm sure this is all well over your head.

>boychild stroking himself to fantasies on an online image board
That's heartily amusing after all the baseless claims of accomplishments you just pulled out of your ass. Again, I'm enjoying your bravado.

>>38860349
Mari Curie did nothing important, and her husband did most of what she did anyway

>>38860431
Why yes the great societies thrive on the art of pondering. From pondering, comes change and progress. I don't see what women have to do with that though.

>>38860412
>males are physically stronger so a matriarchal society can't exist from the get-go
Holy shit, THAT'S your excuse? I guess that's why almost every historically significant scientist, along with every world leader, is either super athletic or a bodybuilder.

File: image.jpg (31KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 540x540px

>>38860349
>Outliers are the average

>>38860436
I'm making the point that people who aren't in power stay that way for a reason.

>>38860469
All major scientists are outliers. Do you think Newton was "average" for men? Or Plato? Or Aristotle? Or any of the greats?

>>38860447
The anon implied the countries weren't great because of the pondering but rather because the feminsim and women's influence made them better.

>>38860274
Fuck outta here with these lies. There were women blacksmiths documented in the 14th century of England. Women didn't do shit because they're dumb lazy cunts

>>38860478
>I'm making the point that people who aren't in power stay that way for a reason.
It's a false comparison. The situation in South Africa is very different to that of women.

>>38860440
Women only have whatever value men decide to give them. They live life on easy mode because betas enable them.

>>38860502
>women blacksmiths means they had all the same opportunities and education as men and weren't controlled strictly in order to ensure all offspring was definitely yours

>>38860412
Youre looking at this from the opposite side. Feminism is the consequence of progress, not the cause. Do you think a bunch whiny cunts were really responsible for the progress in these countries? Get real.

>>38860404
The people want to bicker with each other. They don't want facts. They want to be angry. They want to win.

>>38860487
No but the average scientist who spurred humanity to a higher level is male

>>38860444
I take it said posts do not exist.

I study physics, I run a small organic farm, I am essentially elite to the vast majority of human beings, most men included. I understand you wish to indulge in a narrative which better fits your narrow awareness of reality, finding some sense of power in this, but I am here to offer a more truth-oriented perspective. The idea that being male inherently makes one a valuable member of society is garbage. Most men truly are wastes of resources. I'll only level with you in one aspect, many women are also human trash.

I suppose the end-game of my posts here is to evoke a realisation in the users of this board, that human value transcends race or gender. It is well and good and to look down on those who are sub-human, but you are blind if you consider femaleness automatic grounds for inferiority.

>>38860531
There were no legal controls dipshit. Only feminist lies about patriarchy

>>38860487
>All major scientists are outliers.
All major scientists are the total. Female major scientists are extreme outliers of that total.

If women are honest enough they might realize their rights are given at a mans whim. Violence is a pretty convincing argument and they're not very capable of it.

>>38860517
And the value that men give them is far greater than the value that anyone gives a robot, so my point still stands.

>>38860570
>There were no legal controls dipshit.
t. knows nothing about history.
Ancient Greek and Roman women were literally the property of their husbands and fathers, were not educated and could do little. This continued for many centuries. Medieval Europe had similar systems, although women could become nuns if they wished. The later eras were more socially controlled, with women simply not being educated properly or being taken seriously (George Elliot, for example, had to publish under a pseudonym because no one would publish a woman's book).

>>38860562
>that human value transcends race or gender

Nope, Men are more inherently useless. Even the trashiest of gutter skanks has her vagina and womb

>>38859726
>Kiryu
Wow you actually like the shit tier EVA unit ripoff mechagodzilla? Mechagodzilla 1 is the only true mechagodzilla

Anyone else looking forward to reaping the fruits of their labor in their 40s and knocking up a 20 year old?

I know where my destiny lies.

>>38860642
A woman who creates unwanted progeny, passing on her inferior genes, is arguably worse than useless. She is malevolent.

>>38860562
>that human value transcends race
No. It absolutely does not.
>or gender
Alright fine.

>>38860412
>however if you look up the best countries of the world they are more feminist as you go higher
you mean the ones that are being over run with diversity attacks?

>>38860610
They don't actually deserve that value. The female equivalent in personality, success, and looks of a robot can still live life fairly easily not because they're worth more, but because of their bodies. The hole in between their legs. They wouldn't be objectively better. A woman is only worth what males think she's worth, being enabled by the very bottom of the barrel men who are supposedly useless wastes of space.
This brings things back to the OP:
Women have nothing to bring to the table other than their bodies.

all this argument is all well and good, but if there is no inherent human value where do trannies lie? They usually can't reproduce and they ruin their brains with hormones.

>>38860664
But even if she doesn't have children. She is still a warm hole for a valuable male to use. Most males are nothing to valuable women.

>>38860667
Nice opinions, my penis-wielding friend. Now please, offer an ARGUMENT.

>>38860711
wasnt there just a story about a transgender man giving birth?

>>38860748
>wasnt there just a story about a transgender man giving birth?
But it's super rare. Mostly they're infertile.

>>38860746
A womans worth is her womb and a mans is that that he creates for the child.

>>38860707
And robots don't deserve ANY value at all.
You do nothing but take up space and consume resources.
Robots don't have anything at all to bring to the table, not even their bodies.

>>38860764
maybe for now but id imagine it will become more common

>>38860728
So you're proving OP right then? Good job roast

>>38860807
I agree with this. Robots would be more useful as human manure

>>38860807
This doesn't change the fact that men are, in essence, the better gender. Robots only account for the bottom 1% of society.

>>38860807
>>38860839
Nobody cares normies. Go get fucked by a bear and die off. You let us know when you want WAR!

>>38860862
>You let us know when you want WAR!

You cant even act like a nornal human without being washed over by anxiety.


I wish bottomfeeders would stop larping

File: 1443223324356.jpg (472KB, 1900x1440px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 1900x1440px

>>38859627
You know the answer is already no.

>>38860893
LOL
>Dat troll

File: Capture.png (208KB, 429x438px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 429x438px

>>38860964
Speaking of dat troll..
>pic related, the smart girl who studies physics and runs an organic farm

>>38860853
But what does it matter to you what gender is better? You only care because you're eternally butt-anguished over what a loser you are.


>>38860862
>You let us know when you want WAR!

Ok, I want war. Let's go. Do your worst. I keep my door locked so my place is 100% robot-proof.

>>38861010
>Dick pics
...Neat

>>38859627
>the patriarchy want to keep us barefoot and pregnant

>all we have to offer is pregnancy

females

File: C0FabaYVQAAqqQx.jpg large.jpg (92KB, 980x742px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 980x742px

>>38860562
>I take it said posts do not exist.
It exists. Find them yourself, you lazy cunt.

>I study physics, I run a small organic farm, I am essentially elite to the vast majority of human beings, most men included.
I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Qaeda, and have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces.

>I understand you wish to indulge in a narrative which better fits your narrow awareness of reality, finding some sense of power in this, but I am here to offer a more truth-oriented perspective.
Really? You've done nothing but toss out insults and baseless assertions so far.
Let me know when you have any truths to offer.

>The idea that being male inherently makes one a valuable member of society is garbage.
I never said that.
The idea that you think I even implied this in my posts demonstrates your lack of understanding of male nature.

>Most men truly are wastes of resources. I'll only level with you in one aspect, many women are also human trash.
They're more wasteful. More.

>I suppose the end-game of my posts here is to evoke a realisation in the users of this board, that human value transcends race or gender.
You've done a shit job at it so far.
This whole thread you've done nothing but troll under the guise of some self aggrandizing yuppie cunt.
No one in /r9k/ wants to listen to someone like that.

>It is well and good and to look down on those who are sub-human, but you are blind if you consider femaleness automatic grounds for inferiority.
It is. Women are objectively inferior on almost every front.

>>38861115
> I'm miserable because I don't have a girlfriend.

> All women are horrible.

robots

>>38861045
>Locking the door
FUUUUUUCK my only weakness!

>>38861147
>>the patriarchy want to keep us barefoot and pregnant
>>all we have to offer is pregnancy
females...disgusting bring on the sexbots or nukes.

> All women are horrible.
Dumb cunt it's called a generalization. I hope we don't have to explain what a generalization is to the oh so smart organic farm runner?

File: gettrolledn00b.png (4KB, 374x115px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 374x115px

>>38861135
I'm an elite woman, why won't you admit it!!!!!

>>38859627
>implying being born is a good thing

>>38860746
This fairly comprehensive book that has been absolutely fucking buried by any scientist who wants to keep their job, for starters.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_IQ_Controversy,_the_Media_and_Public_Policy_(book)