Robogfs when? Just when???

>>38848803
When the normans decide it isn't a strange perversion of technology.

Shit like that needs a lot of money for R&D. No company would pour gorrillions of dollars into that. Go ask >>>/sci/ for intense shitposting

File: topkek.jpg (147KB, 1790x712px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1790x712px

>>38848803
What's really pissing me off, is the fact that the SECOND these come out,
femwhores will protest about how robotwaifus "OBJECTIFY DA FEMALE GENDER" and "MUH RIGHTS".
They closed a sexdoll brothel in it's first month of operation because it offers too much competition to hookers.
Women truly are devious fucking beasts.

File: to-go-with-oly-2012-prkfeaturefiles.jpg (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x300px

Another sad fact, is that since normies and roasts don't understand sympathy,
They'll never have a reason TO allow the creation of robotgfs, since they don't understand the crushing loneliness that we experience day by day.
At best, they'll say "just bee urself :DDD"

>>38849026
>Don't blame the norms or roasts, it's the companies that would have built robotgfs.

Few companies would want tofuck their reputation like that.

Although, it could be akin to the body pillow market

File: smug-pepe2.jpg (43KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 400x400px

>>38849123
In the UNLIKELY scenario that feminists allow that to happen, I'm certain many start-up companies would be the ones beginning the industry of robotwaifus.
I doubt Apple and Google will help that market, but the second the market DOES open up, the start-ups will become richer than both Apple and Google combined.

>>38849123
If it makes money, companies will build and sell them. They don't give a fuck about reputation as long as profit is involved.

>>38849156
>retarded exaggeration, but valid point.

Nice my udud

File: flat,800x800,075,t.jpg (77KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 800x800px

>>38849644
One must exaggerate for others to see his point.
As well, with artificial wombs and robo-waifus, I can see the entire female gender dying out in the next couple centuries.
When a 2D image makes a better female than an actual female, you know your gender is fucked.

>>38849778
>wha about intimacy though?

File: images.jpg (5KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 259x194px

>>38849837
Intimacy is important.
Too bad females can't provide it.
Their entire gender is established on the foundings of hypergamy and natural selection.

>>38849864
>your final solution >>38849778 doesn't have a plan for intimacy though.

Chad will not settle for a robogf and artificial wombs, he won't see the point.

As long as chad exists your plan falls apart

File: Untitled-6.png (244KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 512x512px

>>38849912
Chad will die.

>>38849981
>your plan gets too edgy my dude,

beta uprising and 2d wombs

plus you assume everyone shares your view point. Argument was interesting until naow

File: Untitled-4.png (225KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 512x512px

>>38850016
Alright, shitposts aside, I personally doubt that robogfs will even come to fruition, as nobody cares what betas want or are interested in.
It's simply a theory, which will only occur in a perfect world where Chad would be willing to sacrifice his self-pleasure and self-indulgence for the sake of others, which'll never occur.

File: 345345245.png (138KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 350x350px

>>38848803
>she hates you for being a squishy
>you're actually rock hard

File: 1498352339440.png (190KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 300x300px

>mfw would rather fuck a robot than a female.

File: ef8ada46fa1bf1adbbf6fba8a9b385d4.webm (974KB, 830x1000px) Image search: [Google]

974KB, 830x1000px

Can robotgfs come with a dick?

>>38850061
And electric toothbrushes will never take off because who the fuck cares about whether people with parkinsons can brush their teeth?

You also still haven't found me my stats.

File: cYL0mp4K.jpg (24KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 512x512px

>>38850294
Fuck off, faggots get the bullet too.
>>38850322
Considering the argument about people not giving a fuck about people with Parkinson's brushing their teeth, I myself have never actually thought about that which proves the point nobody gives a shit about people with Parkinson's brushing their teeth, and I'm not even near Chad, which would mean Chad literally gives negative fucks.

File: scarlett-johansson-gets-3d-printed-extremely-realistic-humanoid-robot3.jpg (35KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x399px

>>38848803
Some Chinese dude actually already built one himself. It's uh... really creepy. He's even gotten it to start understanding speech

>>38850363
I'm saying that electric toothbrushes were originally conceived to help people with parkinsons (and other motor issues) brush their teeth. No one thought normal people would ever use an electric toothbrush.

But look at them now.

>>38850363
>>38850061
>>38850016
>>38849981
>>38849912
Your argument makes no sense whatsoever. It's a product, and as such it will come to fruition if there are customers willing to buy it. And trust me, there are. Billionaires too, who want to test the new state of art of artificial intelligence. Loners, hipsters, it would be revolutionary and lots of people would love to get their hands on a Robogf.

Chad, Stacy, etc. that stuff doesn't apply here. I don't know why you're even discussing this. There won't be a "female uprising" because people choose AI over them.

File: 1473291057077.png (536KB, 776x840px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 776x840px

>>38850479
Easier way of thinking of it for me is a simple value proposition. Basically you're weighing the value of the potential of a 'real' relationship, which may or may not work out, against the value of a guaranteed persistent companion.

Loners and hipsters will be the first to adopt at higher prices, but as the tech gets cheaper more or more people, I believe, will get into it.