We can live without women. We have inventions that basically

We don't need to live at all

>>38704938
>wanting to reproduce
I think one tenet of being a true robot is that you ascribe to antinatalism. It just doesn't make sense to want any more suffering in the world.

That being said, yes; even simple onaholes have largely sated my sexual frustration and all the examples of women I've seen have removed the romantic vision I had of them.

File: 166586.png (506KB, 998x944px) Image search: [Google]

506KB, 998x944px

>>38704938
>Sadly. We can't reproduce without them, that's the only thing they're useful for.

time to end this "human race" bullshit

>>38704938
i have several thousand dollars in savings and am looking to purchase a sex doll. Where do you buy them from?

File: 1487195774597.jpg (557KB, 1312x1000px) Image search: [Google]

557KB, 1312x1000px

real women nowadays only nag and take your money anyway

File: L8401.jpg (178KB, 756x1206px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 756x1206px

>>38704938
>>38704851
Women are so painfully obsolete NOW with just dolls, I can't wait to see what the future holds with AI, and robotics.

I see only a few future options for human women considering artificial wombs already exisit for other mammals.
Will we even use them to breeding in 50 years, and just abort female fetuses, or thrown them in the trash when they're born?
Or Will they be our pets?
Or Will the only jobs that exist for them being sex work, seeing as their only use is the holes in their body?
Will arranged marriages have to happen, and women have to marry whoever their father, who chose not to thrown them in the trash when they were born, wants them to in order to ensure her survival?

To the toasted roasties reading this: If
You weren't so shit with your selfish, rotten, boring, materialistic personalities, you could have avoided this. This whole thing is on YOU.