>this is a 5/10 in the United States of America

>>38673827
Maybe for black men. That is a 1/10 for white American males. That 3/10 guy is dating her probably she is a rich actress which she is.

>>38673853
>3/10
Really?

Isn't the dude way more attractive than that?

>>38673853
that guy would be like a 6-7 if he worked out

>>38674191
Sounds like he's your type.

>>38674243
I'm not a gay, the dude doesn't look ugly.

Why is he carrying a hubcap?

>>38674259
He could up his score like this guy said >>38674223
but he is a 3/10 currently

>>38673827
That dude ain't a 3/10.
He's a 5/10 if he worked out he would be a 6/10 and if he didn't dress like a degenerate he'd be a 7/10.

>>38674320
Isn't it like
1/10 - Elephant Man (Extremely ugly)
2/10 - Severe deformities (Hideous)
3/10 - Major flaws/less severe deformities (Ugly)
4/10 - Minor but very noticeable flaws (Homely)
5/10 - Average Joe (Plain)
6/10 - Some attractive traits (Above average)
7/10 - Decent amount of attractive traits (Good looking)
8/10 - Many good traits (Hot)
9/10 - Ideal form, almost intimidating to look at (Stunning)
10/10 - Perfect
?

The guy looks like he has symmetrical face structure and masculine bone structure, despite lunch lady arms, I don't see how he's less than a 5.