LIGHT PEDOPHILES ON FIRE

>>38617303
Seems like you lost your ass on your way to pol

Robots are pedo friendly. And not pseudo edgy cunts who repeat whatever normies already believe, just with more anger.

File: tumblr_inline_n68riip0ld1rz6ix3[2].gif (490KB, 500x325px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 500x325px

There is literally nothing wrong with pedophilia.
As long as the child and their parents consent to the marriage and you partake in an intercourse afterwards.
It's only abnormal to desire the old rotten fruit than the fresh ripe in-season ones.

File: 1491743849951.jpg (15KB, 500x472px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 500x472px

>>38618395
pedophilia is still illegal
dut-dada, you're in jail

>>38618457
and who's this man that has authority over both god's word then nature?

take your man made illogical rules and throw them in the garbage, stop being a brainwashed normie

>>38618511
stop trying to frame me as the weird one when in reality no one on /b/ is openly pedophiliac so that makes you the lowest of the low
cunt

Save pedophiles, spare them

>>38618625
/b/ is normie central you normalfag piece of shit, you need to get the fuck out.

Is 15 considered pedophilia

>>38618719
look at this fucking loser
he thinks that 4chan blindly accepts and jerks off anybody's fetish
even we have standards you fucking cunt
fuck off
also normie is not a word you use to describe anyone who disagrees with you

>>38618395
By that analogy, you're eating unripe produce.

Pedos are a cancer on this earth

File: too damn smug.jpg (56KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 633x758px

hahha what a bunch of mad normies. There's nothing wrong with pedophilia. Whether the girl is 8 or 18, if she gives her consent, what's the problem?
>inb4 hurr duur she's too young to make that decision
We live in a fucking society where 8 year olds are allowed to choose their own gender.

>>38617356
>Robots are pedo friendly

Stopped reading right there. Die scum

>>38619053
i really love how upset you guys get. Even though you guys know there's literally nothing wrong with pedophilia. It was fucking legal and the norm at one point. Let go of your sheep mentality and accept it already

File: emily feld 2.jpg (116KB, 1080x1033px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1080x1033px

>>38617303
I agree with this plan

>>38618625
/b/ has daily loli threads and at least half of all those "photos you weren't supposed to share" are girls around 16 or 17

>>38618457
fucking kids is illegal.
watching kids get fucked is illegal.

thinking about fucking kids is not.

>Being gay isnt a mental disorder
>Being a pedo is


You can only pick one buddy

>>38618817
>if you eat an unripe fruit you deserve to die
normies actually believe this

>>38619014
This guy gets it

>>38619053
>I unironically believe in what 99% of society also believes in
>this makes me a robot

>>38618746

No and that's within a year of the aoc in most parts of the world. 18 is just the most common aoc for doing porn.

>>38619014
>We live in a fucking society where 8 year olds are allowed to choose their own gender.

I maintain that that is child abuse and needs to stop.

>>38619098
And i agree with your picture, very pedoesque post more as you threaten burn me alive please.

File: emily feld 8.jpg (64KB, 1080x774px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1080x774px

>>38619180
Burning is the best way. Graves smell and take up too much space.

>>38619153
Great that's good to know. This calms me.

>>38617356
>/pol/
>hating pedos
zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

>>38619263
>emily feld '8'
Roastie wishes she was 8

But what about the environment if you burn us the pedo particles will get into the water and turn he fish pedo

tfw no pedo gf
zambz#6205

File: 18443309_1434955583191787_5673877764835377152_n.jpg (51KB, 545x431px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 545x431px

>>38619325
It's not a perfect solution, but it will do.

File: 1369796427506.jpg (209KB, 600x582px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 600x582px

>redditfag gets so buttblasted in the other thread he sperged out and makes this

>>38617303
>LIGHT PEDOPHILES ON FIRE
For thought crimes? No, but if they touch kids it sounds fair.

File: 1499926962429.jpg (25KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x500px

>>38617303
>loli

>pedophilia

Yeah but I watch pedophile busts every day so people who wanna fuck real children shouldn't be lit on fire, but sent to prison. But wouldn't complain either way doesn't affect me.

>>38619174
Homophobia is the only thing worse than pedophilia in the eyes of white normalfags.

So dont think we are not on the same boat here.

>>38619428
^ This, fuck thought crimes you can't punish people for thinking certain way, if they act on their looney thoughts it is a matter on its own

>>38619438
Conjectures mate, how do they work
I think the real life pedophiles who think their own urges are more important than a fresh lifeforms mental health should be burned alive

>>38619497
Ahh sweet cognitive dissonance, lets begin

>Conjectures mate, how do they work
I think the real life pedophiles who think their own urges are more important than a fresh lifeforms mental health should be burned alive

I was jerking at 9 PLEASE tell me how using some 17 year old thot as a cock sleve would have ruined my mental health lol faggot

>>38619360
I dont think you are being utilitarian enough, Thats 80000 calories going to waste that could have been used to feed starving children

>>38619552
Do tell me how banging a 17 year old is pedophilia? age of consent is 15 in my country (you will still be a social outcast for doing it but the law won't do jack shit if both parties agreed to it)
Also i wasn't talking about your mental health i was talking of the potential child victim of your sexual urges (assuming you would take it to RL, if it's just fapping to paint or pixels no one gives/should give two fucks)
>i was jerking at 9
Well that explains your strange defensive behavior, being exposed to sexual stuff at early age has long lasting mental impact on your behavior and development

>>38619723
Baka, in the example I am still 9 and have already jerked it showing that i am sexually initiated without any outside stimulus, If i were to then have sex with a 17 year old female how would that cause any form of mental anguish.

Please answer the question.

>>38617303
This is the ultimate form of white-knighting. Mini-Stacy isn't going to give you any cunny for protecting her, OP. Stop embarrassing yourself.

File: 18421241_470512676619906_993632940103565312_n.jpg (117KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 640x1136px

>>38619578
That's a good point.
IDK what kind of infrastructure it would take to harness them as biofuel, but it's probably costly. I suppose they could be mixed in with the coal at local power plants.

File: 1500679701342.png (1MB, 525x503px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 525x503px

>>38619799
>self exploring =/= sexual intimacy with another older person
Well first of all you sound like you had a fucked up childhood if you started at age of 9, when i was 9 i was playing games outside with my friends and comparing favorite cartoon characters
And victims of pedophilia have been known to get c-ptsd, sexual confusion, fear of opposite sex, self loathing, unnatural fear / repulsion to being touched by others, higher suicide rates, trouble functioning in society etc
I don't know how it happens since i am neither a psychologist nor a victim myself but there have been studies on this, you should google the subject if you're interested in the long lasting effects of victims of sexual predators

>>38619087
So was setting people on fire out of fear of witches. The past is full of stupid things we regret.

>>38618746
15 is completely normal
normalfags just are brainwashed into thinking that anything below 18 is a toddler

>>38619138
this exactly

>>38619910
Those stats are based on violent offenses and would you believe that they match up almost exactly with the same data found on adults who go through violent unwanted rapes. To think that violent rape and normal sex would cause similar reactions is beyond cognitive dissonance.

>self =/= sedxual intaimacy with another older person

that goes without saying but whats to question is whether or not that intimacy is harmful.

>>38620530
Don't know about consensual pedophilia, good luck finding studies on that

>>38620600

Its impossible to actually conduct such a study in this day and age but at the very least we have the rind fiasco that proves that at the very least sex as a child doesnt fucking mind break you for the rest of your life.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy

The conclusion makes perfect logical sense, If you want to group all child sex interactions with fucking rape the data is going to show that you are being intellectually dishonest.

>>38620719
>David Spiegel also argued that Rind et al.'s suggestion of relabeling some forms of sexual encounters between adults and children/adolescents as adult-child (or adult-adolescent) sex is fundamentally flawed, because children cannot give meaningful consent to sexual relations with an adult
Well there is a point id like to stress too, also the coaxing a kids consent is fucked up

Im not saying pedophilia = rape, im saying kids are not ready for that kind of relations and even if they would be coaxed / consent to it they could still be mentally damaged as a result, kids are not ready to make decisions like that

As for legal ages 15 seems ok with consent, bit weird but the teen has reached the point where it can decision whether or not he wants to have sexual relations with other people

Anything below 15 seems like wishful thinking that the kid is ready for it, there may be some kids that would be mentally mature enough to have sexual relations but as far as law goes 15 is a safe buffer age

>>38620530
Say it is consensual and intimate and all that; what would you think of the guy who pursues that kind of a relationship with very young girls?

File: 1500948956743.png (69KB, 250x245px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 250x245px

>jack off to farts
It's ok, everyone has their fetishes
>jack off to deformed woman
It's ok, everyone has their fetishes
>jack off to feces
It's ok, everyone has their fetishes
>jack off to guts
It's ok, everyone has their fetishes
>jack of to woman that are 6-4 years from being 18
YOU FUCKING DEGENERATE, YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF, BURN IN HELL YOU PEDO

Flaw-less logic.

>>38621144
No one cares/ should care what you jack off to, just leave the 3d kids alone

>>38621144
this

it's telling that even people who fucking fetishize death and killing are more tolerated by normalfags than pedos

File: emily feld shotgun.jpg (57KB, 1080x719px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1080x719px

>>38621144
Nice strawman, hombre. I'd remove them all.

>>38617303

>>38598894
roast 'em

File: __akebono_kantai_collection_drawn_by_hatsunatsu__20aabbb996f060359a233a89e0d7a3cc.jpg (249KB, 547x800px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 547x800px

There's nothing wrong with being a pedo though.
Grow up /pol/

>>38621330
With being pedo? not really, pedos actually tend to be more empathetic to children than regular adults
With being sexual predator that coaxes / forces kids to have sex? big problem those fuckers should be hanged
With fapping to pixels or paint? go for it
True pedos love children and know their limits, a pedo should be a distant admirer and a guardian to the little ones, not some bush stalking pervert out to release his/her urges
However there is a stigma and taboo with the topic in the west so i doubt things are going to change anytime soon

If you want to call yourself child lover let them blossom in peace, otherwise it's like touching the wings of a butterfly, admire their beauty, do not soil their wings

File: __izumi_sagiri_eromanga_sensei_drawn_by_wankoo_mikami__0ef02bbce057af511ad627fc6718f56c.png (957KB, 700x1174px) Image search: [Google]

957KB, 700x1174px

>>38621454
>True pedos love children
I don't love children at all, I just find them attractive desu.

>>38621067
The problem with this is that the law is not consistent because in many places children can give consent to one another with romeo and juliet laws and the like. It goes to follow that if two children are fine to consent in the eyes of the law why would it be any less meaningful for a child to consent to an adult.

LGBTP when

>>38621128
An unfortunate soul born 100 years too late, a person whos ancestors have been fucking 12 year olds for 1000s or years and is being told that he is fucked for the status quo being changed within the last 100

>>38621548
As long as you keep your hands off of them IRL i don't see a problem here, happy fapping
>>38621611
Not anytime soon in the west, if i were a betting man id say 2100

File: 56b.jpg (59KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 800x533px

>tfw just wanked to loli this morning and there's nothing anti-pedos can do about it since it's technically legal

>>38621676
Just dont move to canada fampai

>>38621637
>fucking 12 year olds
doesn't sound very intimate or consensual

are these ancestors the ones who had one wife who happened to be young? or dindu warlords who fucked whatever they wanted?

>>38621639

I mean laws against homosexuality were still in effect less than 50 years ago in most western countries...

>>38618395
Pedophilia results in lasting damage onto the child. Your fetish/preference literally harms children, when they hit sexual maturity sexually abused children regress and develop depression. They literally don't understand sex, if they partake in it they just see at as a weird activity, it isn't until they reach sexual maturity that they learn just what they were coerced into doing. Afterwards they often feel used and discarded.
Children don't understand sex, they don't know the implications of it, they don't get that kind of attraction, your fanticise about having sex with clueless, easily manipulatable children. Worst part is they will eventually grow out of childhood, and you probably won't give a shit about them and will forget they existed while they live with the knowledge that they were abused and used.
t. former sexually abused child, mentally scarred adult who takes antidepressants and still thinks about the sexual abuse and considers suicide.

>>38621792
Well i don't see pedophiles garnering the support homosexuals did with help of Freddie Mercury and other celebrity homosexuals, long road before society even accept attraction to children as something normal
Some don't accept homosexuality even today as something "natural", im on the fence about the whole pedophilia thing if it's in RL, people would just abuse it to coax / force kids to have sex

>>38619014
>There's nothing wrong with pedophilia. Whether the girl is 8 or 18, if she gives her consent, what's the problem?
The problem is that kids literally don't understand sex, they don't feel that kind of attraction yet. Children are too easily manipulated, they can be manipulated into doing sex acts they don't understand for reasons they don't understand. Then, when they reach sexual maturity they learn the implications of the abuse, and often feel the blow then. It permanently damages them. You are attracted to the most vulnurable group of people in the world, sexual intercourse with children literally leaves them scarred because your coercing ignorant children into doing things they cant understand until they reach sexual maturity. Sexually abused kids often develop depression and are scarred by the time they understand what happened to them.

>>38621730
I apologize if my crass language distracted you from the substance of my post the ancestors would fit both categories. As a reference he is an article showing that as little as 200 years ago it was legal to marry and bed children as young as 10 in the majority of states in america.

https://discover-the-truth.com/2016/09/13/the-age-of-consent-laws-in-america-1800s/

>>38621797
Violent abuse =/= all sexual relations with a child

If we are talking about sexual maturity most start masturbating at about 12 why would there be any difference between me jacking it and eating a pizza and watching tv while my uncle goes down on me. Logically speaking please, keep your emotions away from me.

>>38621986
>the ancestors would fit both categories
>keep your emotions away from me

degenerate

>>38621920
Its more than normal, it was the status quo up until about 200 years ago. It is in our dna to bed them as early as possible due to the fact that you only lived to about 30 for a large portion of human history, You can still see the vestiges of this behaviour in the child marriages present in the east (you christians dont get a pass mary was 13 at most when she married joseph).

Even as a pedo myself I dont think it should be legal, too much room for abuse so the good will have to suffer with the bad until we are breed out of the gene pool.

File: 1476194243650.jpg (52KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 640x640px

>>38622046
Wanting emotions to take part in a discussion on a LITERAL robot board. Poetry

>>38617303
At what age is it pedophillia /r9k/

>>38622110
Emotions are part of healthy relationships; which is what you are advocating, because it sounds better than "me want fuck kids"

>>38622114
Varies: Biologically, anytime before puberty

Socially, literally pick a number between 7 and infinity and Ill give you a country why is not seen as pedophilia.

Personally, anything less than 12

>>38621986
>sexual maturity most start masturbating at about 12
This is factually incorrect, sexual urges =/= sexual maturity. Sexual maturity can occur anywhere from 16-20. it is extremely rare for it to occur anywhere near 12.
>Violent abuse =/= all sexual relations with a child
Yes, but literally ALL sexual relations with children are harmful. Children are too young to understand the nature behind sexual relationships. They literally aren't developed enough to understand those interactions and don't realize the impact of them until they reach sexual maturity.

File: IMG_5709.gif (2MB, 288x204px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 288x204px

>>38619014
>We live in a fucking society where 8 year olds are allowed to choose their own gender.

Damn...he's got a point

Those who actually harm children, sure. Those that realize they're fucked in the head and seek help, nope.
>Seeling scapegoats to live out ypur violent desires.

>>38622183
>This is factually incorrect, sexual urges =/= sexual maturity. Sexual maturity can occur anywhere from 16-20. it is extremely rare for it to occur anywhere near 12.

cmon senpai, keep the straw men on the farm. In the example I gave physical sexual maturity did not come into play. Let me make the question easier to answer. Why would me masturbating myself cause any more of an issue than if someone else were to masturbate me

>Yes, but literally ALL sexual relations with children are harmful. Children are too young to understand the nature behind sexual relationships. They literally aren't developed enough to understand those interactions and don't realize the impact of them until they reach sexual maturity.

Except that is not true. Being unable to understand something does not make participation inherently harmful refer to my previous statement. Do i really need to know more than : This feels good and i dont have to reciprocate. How would this impact me any more than masturbation.

File: IMG_5710.jpg (41KB, 320x357px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 320x357px

>>38619497
No one deserves to be burned alive desu. Two wrongs don't make a right.
>inb4 just world
>inb4 'free-will' meme

>>38622154
Asking for a response based in fact and not emotion does not a degenerate make

>>38622319
>Why would me masturbating myself cause any more of an issue than if someone else were to masturbate me
Because they is a difference between pleasuring yourself and pleasuring others. Even if someone were to be pleasuring you, they are inherently getting pleasure from it themselves. In your example, if a pedophile were to masturbate a child, that child may not be aware of it at the time, but the pedophile is getting sexually excited by that, hes doing it to pleasure himself. When the child reaches sexual maturity they learned that someone used their body to pleasure themselves, even if it wasn't directly. This leads to the child believing they were used, and discarded. There is something INHERENTLY HARMFUL about all sexual relations with a child. its because those relations are self-serving to the pedophile, so when the child grows up and realizes this, they feel used. I know this from firsthand experience. You are arguing a null point. You cannot argue that pedophiles don't intend to, in some way, serve their own pleasure.

>>38622365
>attempting to reason with sadists

>>38622439
The conclusion of that statement would also be that all philanthropy is wrong because some get pleasure out of doing things for others.
As humans of course we do things to bring ourselves happiness but in the same token many gain that happiness by bringing happiness to others. Do you disagree?

I have to question your conclusion as it relates to a child growing up and believing they were used, If both parties profit and go their separate ways why does anyone have to feel used? Again read my example carefully: A child that already knows about sexual pleasure due to doing it by themselves is then pleasured by someone else without any pressure to reciprocate. At the end of the day the child gets what they would have gotten by themselves anyways, an orgasm, with less work and probably more interesting than only masturbation and an adult get happiness through that child happiness. Why would this situation leave any resentment

>>38622694
>As humans of course we do things to bring ourselves happiness but in the same token many gain that happiness by bringing happiness to others
But doing random acts of kindness like giving a kid an ice cream is far different from sticking your finger in an orifice of their body for sexual pleasure.
It's a different kind of pleasure, one is emphatic and altruistic, another is sexual. When the child develops and realizes this they feel used.
>If both parties profit and go their separate ways why does anyone have to feel used
Because both parties don't profit in the same way, one is robbed of its innocence and feels dirty, another fed its desires and never got defiled. I can't explain the psychology behind it, I'm not an expert, but I can tell you it exists, and many, many other people can attest to this.
>Why would this situation leave any resentment
It leaves resentment because they child never really understood what was going on, they weren't receiving some altruistic gift, they were being used by a pedophile for sexual pleasure, this realization is hurtful.
The problem is I don't think you're recognizing the difference between feeling pleasure for doing something kind or feeling sexual pleasure for doing something you find sexually pleasing.

>>38622881
>Because both parties don't profit in the same way, one is robbed of its innocence and feels dirty
I should clarify this statement, it's too emotional.
One is knowingly receiving sexual pleasure, and it's using another person to do this. the other is receiving a sort of pleasure it doesn't understand, and they soon realize they only received that pleasure, to please another person. It leaves a feeling of just being a useful idiot, a manipulatable tool. It makes that person just feel like a fuckable object, and that makes you feel like you lost your innocence at a young age.

>>38623021
>>38622881

In the situation that you have outlined I would have to agree with your points. All of them there is a psychological basis behind it but it is based in societal perceptions illustrated by the use of words such as innocence, dirty an defiled. It is not that at physical sexual maturity you are divined with the knowledge of all things sexual, its the growing up in a society where over time you find out that you were wronged and will then look back with a new reference at your past experiences labeling them as bad. I posit that a society where sex isn't seen as something with such negative connotations the person in your scenario might have had a different experience but in that same breath an adult that has grown up in such a society would be absolutely in the wrong for potentially causing a child to have to go through that knowing what society would do to the experience over time thus as you said using them to fulfill their desires.

How ever in your scenario you detailed a child that was apparently too young to know what was happening while in mine the child was old enough to have already masturbated themselves. At this point i dont know whether you are ignoring it subconciosly, purposely
or agree with it and feel no need to respond.

File: 5b8.jpg (34KB, 680x1015px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 680x1015px

>>38617356
>r9k pedo friendly
Shut up faggot. Get the noose ready.

>>38618765
gtfo normie if you havent been lurking r9k for more than a year you dont need to be posting.

>>38623342
>How ever in your scenario you detailed a child that was apparently too young to know what was happening while in mine the child was old enough to have already masturbated themselves. At this point i dont know whether you are ignoring it subconciosly, purposely
I already addressed this: SEXUAL URGES =/= SEXUAL MATURITY. Urges to masturbate and pleasure oneself doesn't prove an explicit understanding of sex acts.

The notion that it's a societal problem and not a psychological one doesn't matter, it causes psychological damage to the victim, that's whats important. In this scenario, the child is coerced into doing an act they do not understand, and when they reach the peak of their sexual maturity (16-20) they realize the implications of the situation. This realization causes the child to regress and become resentful, it hurts that person. They come to the conclusion, on their own, that they were used as an object to sexually please a pedophile without them understanding.

Keep in mind this is only referring to situations in which there is the illusion of consent. As I believe both of us can agree violent abuse is always wrong.

>>38623624
>They come to the conclusion, on their own
Let me expand on this, as I meant to do that. After I was sexually abused I was sheltered from all discussion of sexuality, I was homeschooled until I was 16, by then I had already become sexually mature and developed depression and had constant thoughts about my sexual abuse. I was not violently abused, I was coerced into a sex act. When I began to learn what sex was I began to understand, like most people, the nature of sexual relationships. I realized I never wanted that as a child, I did not want to please someone sexually. I was used to sexually please a person against my knowledge, I felt used.

>>38623624

>The notion that it's a societal problem and not a psychological one doesn't matter, it causes psychological damage to the victim, that's whats important. In this scenario, the child is coerced into doing an act they do not understand, and when they reach the peak of their sexual maturity (16-20) they realize the implications of the situation. This realization causes the child to regress and become resentful, it hurts that person. They come to the conclusion, on their own, that they were used as an object to sexually please a pedophile without them understanding.

We have already addressed this and we both came to the same conclusion lets keep this moving forward please
> but in that same breath an adult that has grown up in such a society would be absolutely in the wrong for potentially causing a child to have to go through that knowing what society would do to the experience over time thus as you said using them to fulfill their desires.

>I already addressed this: SEXUAL URGES =/= SEXUAL MATURITY. Urges to masturbate and pleasure oneself doesn't prove an explicit understanding of sex acts.

All you are essentially saying here are different things are different. Still not addressing the scenario in its entirety. The scenario given was as a response to the thought that the child had no knowledge of the pleasure they were having and would build a resentment from being used after finding out much later but if the child is old enough to know that the pleasure they received was sexual in nature why would they need a more comprehensive understanding to avoid not feeling used as it was something they would be doing on their own please take note that my scenario strictly deals with aided masturbation where no penetration is present.

>>38623707
>Let me expand on this, as I meant to do that. After I was sexually abused I was sheltered from all discussion of sexuality, I was homeschooled until I was 16, by then I had already become sexually mature and developed depression and had constant thoughts about my sexual abuse. I was not violently abused, I was coerced into a sex act. When I began to learn what sex was I began to understand, like most people, the nature of sexual relationships. I realized I never wanted that as a child, I did not want to please someone sexually. I was used to sexually please a person against my knowledge, I felt used.

I am truly sorry to hear this but it goes to show that you would most likely have lived a normal life if you were not isolated in this fashion. As you were not placed in a box but in a situation where you were deprived of many experiences and with the knowledge that you were deprived because of what happened to you. If you were allowed to live a normal life studies show that you would have been far less likely to have any long term negative effects.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy

>>38624025
>All you are essentially saying here are different things are different. Still not addressing the scenario in its entirety.

I understand your scenario completely. The child in your scenario is being used as a tool to pleasure the pedophile against their knowledge, they will at some point realize this and feel used. I've addressed this several times.

>I am truly sorry to hear this but it goes to show that you would most likely have lived a normal life if you were not isolated in this fashion. As you were not placed in a box but in a situation where you were deprived of many experiences and with the knowledge that you were deprived because of what happened to you.

My point in providing my anecdotal evidence was to show you that society didn't condition me to feel used. I just naturally felt that way. That specific feeling was not something that came about by the way I was raised, the only negative effects that could arise from me being sheltered were social, and I developed normal social skills.
I wasn't conditioned to feel bad about what happened to me, it came naturally. I have spoken to many people who have experienced similar, who have had different experiences with being sheltered or lack there of, and all of which feel similarly about their abuse. The theme of being used against their knowledge to please someone sexually is common amongst all of them.

>If you were allowed to live a normal life studies show that you would have been far less likely to have any long term negative effects.

So it would seem you have read studies on this subject? This baffles me because almost all scientific literature I have read suggests that sexual interactions with children almost always leads to future negative effects. Even you recognize that if I lived a normal life, I would only have a less likely chance to have negative effects. So you must recognize that any sexual contact would lead to there being a chance of negative effect on the child. You should expand.

>only eight replies in this thread are visible with my filters
Holy shit, hi (((guys)))

>>38624821
holy shit, did I did it?
I killed a thread by calling out shills?
I've been waiting for this day for FIVE YEARS

>>38624797
>I've addressed this several times.
except you haven't, you gloss over it with a single sentence and no explaination. Although we do not have data your logic does not extrapolate. In your previous example you clearly showed that due to being completely unaware, the child would feel resentment, here is a situation where they are aware so the same answer would not apply.

>My point in providing my anecdotal evidence was to show you that society didn't condition me to feel used. I just naturally felt that way.

I said box to show that although you were homeschooled you did not exist in a vacuum. Society as is stands is built against pedo relations so to say that it occurred naturally is at most a half truth, this is shown by the echo chamber of anecdotal evidence you were subjected to as anyone who even claims to have had a positive experience is told that nahh you were abused bro. for example milo yiannopolis and george takei.

>This baffles me because almost all scientific literature I have read suggests that sexual interactions with children almost always leads to future negative effects

I am read as is possible in this political and social climate, any research that shows something that goes against what is popular will of course be panned similar to the correlations found between race or sexual orientation and intelligence. The study I cited was not disputed buy academia but instead by religious conservatives who said it went against conventional wisdom. To be clear if you did not manage to read the study, it posits that all child sexual relations are not equal and that there should be a distinction between abuse and interactions due to the fact that those who were not abused were not likely to show pervasive harm and maladjustment

The reason I said less likely is due to the thought that even if your entire family was supportive of the incident you and your family do not live in a vacuum and at some point you could have been told that you were wronged

File: sagi.gif (96KB, 248x203px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 248x203px

>tfw participate in pedo-hate threads to defend them because it angers roasties who were raped by their dad when they were younger

>>38619014
>>We live in a fucking society where 8 year olds are allowed to choose their own gender.

It's crazy times we're living in. We're also in a time where you can be arrested if you're found to have pictures of drawn loli on your computer and then tried as if it was actual CP.

One thing that pisses me off is you often see young girls dressing like complete sluts yet the parents are often the ones screaming about stopping the sexulisation of children. It's insane.

>>38625477
>In your previous example, you clearly showed that due to being completely unaware, the child would feel resentment, here is a situation where they are aware so the same answer would not apply.
No, you're completely missing what I'm saying. The child will ALWAYS be unaware to some extent. They cannot understand the nature of the sexual act. Not until sexual maturity.
>Society as is stands is built against pedo relations so to say that it occurred naturally is at most a half truth
Perhaps that is true, but of all the people I've met with similar experiences, several of which grew up in Asia, which has a very different sex climate and views pedophilia much differently, they all came to the same conclusions focusing on this theme of being used by their abuser for sexual pleasure.

I've never encountered studies that were in favor of pedophilia, nor have I ever met a psychology expert who was in favor of that idea, so I'm interested in this study you're citing. Could you give me some information on it? I can look it up in a couple databases, if what you're saying is true and its never been disputed by academia it should be published in a journal and be in a database.

>>38625833
>They cannot understand the nature of the sexual act. Not until sexual maturity.
This is some truth. Remember getting constant boners and not being horny? To be five again.

File: AoC map.png (342KB, 2000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 2000x1000px

I don't see any countries that allow you to fuck preteens...

>>38617303
I seriously don't understand the stigma against pedophilia. The girl can choose to get out of the relationship at any time she wants. She chose to be in a relationship. Let her do what she wants you bigot.

File: consent pop.jpg (316KB, 1200x1053px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1200x1053px

What is consent robots? Have you ever gotten a TRUE YES?

>>38625833

>The child will ALWAYS be unaware to some extent. They cannot understand the nature of the sexual act. Not until sexual maturity.

Because at 16-20 they are magically divined with this knowledge? What does that say about countries such as Germany and Austria that have the aoc set at 14, are they just critically depraved or is it just social conditioning. The cognitive bias has reached levels that should not even be possible. As an extreme example, you can have child prodigies that will always know more than you about physics or math. To make a blanket statement like that makes no sense. Give me a logic to follow please im short circuiting here.

I can understand your anecdotes but they dont apply to the general population and the stories of those that do have positive experiences will be suppressed george takei, milo yianopolis, myself.

>I've never encountered studies that were in favor of pedophilia

Science shouldnt be infavour of or against anything, you ask a question do the work and get an answer. Here the question is does sexual interaction at a young age cause large long-term negative effects, the answer, no

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=DF91AAD2B2D2874E05A819D4FFE480A1?doi=10.1.1.492.8181&rep=rep1&type=pdf

>>38625994
See all that pink?

1. marry a loli
2.????
3 profit fampai

File: Screenshot_5.png (8KB, 634x344px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 634x344px

>>38626201
>Because at 16-20 they are magically divined with this knowledge
No, but the teenage years are generally the years where our understanding of sexual interactions are developed. It is well known that our brain, and its corresponding parts, continue to develop until we are 24 years old.
>Science shouldnt be infavour of or against anything, you ask a question do the work and get an answer
I agree I was referring to the conclusion, or "answer." I've never encountered one where the conclusion was in favor of the practice of pedophilia.

I tried loading that study you linked and got pic related. I'm going to assume its legitimate considering it was on what seems to be a legit PSU database. but I can't reference it unless you copy/paste some excerpts from it.

If its the Rind et al. study that doesn't even bother. because the same question is asked.
To address the question "does sexual interaction at a young age cause large long-term negative effects" im going to assume you mean pedophilic sexual interaction, not just sexual interaction. And even the Rind et al. study concluded that there were some long-term negative effects of it, it just said they were as bad as society perceived it. And there is still a large potential for higher negative effects depending on how parents deal with the situation.

>>38627404
>Generally
so we can both agree this exists on a spectrum and it is possible for a child to have an understanding of sexual interactions.

>If its the Rind et al. study that doesn't even bother. because the same question is asked.
To address the question "does sexual interaction at a young age cause large long-term negative effects" im going to assume you mean pedophilic sexual interaction, not just sexual interaction. And even the Rind et al. study concluded that there were some long-term negative effects of it, it just said they were as bad as society perceived it. And there is still a large potential for higher negative effects depending on how parents deal with the situation.

>The results of the meta-analysis indicated that college students who had experienced CSA were slightly less well-adjusted compared to other students who had not experienced CSA, but that family environment was a significant confound that may be responsible for the association between CSA and harm. Intense, pervasive harm and long-term maladjustment were due to confounding variables in most studies rather than to the sexual abuse itself

'slightly' my boy. Sex isnt such a big woo woo deal as you seem to want to make it. Nature says it feels good nurture tell you that you weren't ready to feel good or should be ashamed that you felt good.

>>38617356
>I am /r9k/
>therefore /r9k/ is pedo friendly

cool it there, hothead

>>38621676
>TFW FBI doesn't care and will V& you anyway


Say hi to the agents for me!

File: 1498240522806.png (791KB, 586x623px) Image search: [Google]

791KB, 586x623px

>>38617356
Look I dont like pedos but id rather see them get help.
Same as any drug addict.

File: 1492445837701.png (292KB, 547x402px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 547x402px

>>38623411
Checked, I'll spin up the rotors

>>38628484
Fun fact: Jesus's mother married a grown ass man when she was at most 13 which was common place

>>38628219
>so we can both agree this exists on a spectrum and it is possible for a child to have an understanding of sexual interactions.
not exactly. Some children just develop sooner than others, so it is physically possible for someone to sexually before becoming a teenager, but its extremely rare and most likely unhealthy.
>'slightly' my boy. Sex isnt such a big woo woo deal as you seem to want to make it. Nature says it feels good nurture tell you that you weren't ready to feel good or should be ashamed that you felt good.
But it still causes damage. It's still harmful. It's still wrong. It doesn't matter HOW harmful it is. You are still harming a child for your own sexual pleasure. There's no other way to put it. it doesn't matter if its "slightly" or "significantly" you are putting your sexual pleasure above a childs future. Plus that study is flawed as it only examines college students, if you're in college you are most likely more adjusted than most others, as another study noted that a large quantity of CSA victims dropped out their first semester of college or never went to college.

>>38629422
This seems like a good place to end im tired af.

>so it is physically possible for someone to sexually before becoming a teenager, but its extremely rare and most likely unhealthy.

>But it still causes damage. It's still harmful. It's still wrong. It doesn't matter HOW harmful it is. You are still harming a child for your own sexual pleasure. There's no other way to put it. it doesn't matter if its "slightly" or "significantly" you are putting your sexual pleasure above a childs future. Plus that study is flawed as it only examines college students, if you're in college you are most likely more adjusted than most others, as another study noted that a large quantity of CSA victims dropped out their first semester of college or never went to college.

Based on the law of averages its most likely true that to achieve that slightly less adjusted figure many students would have fallen in the ranks of not affected and well adjusted. Therfore , based on your last two statements not 100% of pedophillic interactions cause harm and i strive to be apart of the percentage that doesnt cause harm. Thats all im tryna say fampai.

If you respond ill read it but I wont respond if the thread is still up in the morning ill respond then.

>>38629703
>>38629703
fair enough, i know we've been at it a while. I'm not sure we will ever come to an agreement.
but i will say this
>i strive to be apart of the percentage that doesnt cause harm. Thats all im tryna say fampai.
Although i appreciate you dont want to hurt kids, you dont get to make that choice.
its based on the child whether or not they gets harmed by it, not the offender. Everyone is different and everyone takes sexual abuse differently.
The study still suggests that it causes harm to the vast majority of children who made it into college, albeit slightly (when it comes to college kids, most disfuctional people dont make it to college).
I get nothing I say will make you change, as with most people on the internet. But pedophilia is harmful in the vast majority of cases, whether its extremely harmful or slightly harmful. You should recognize this, ESPECIALLY if you dont want to harm people

>>38621797
>they just see at as a weird activity
it was still fun doing it to myself, and I often fantasized about playing with other people's penises when I was really young. What consequence do you think that would've had?

>>38621926
>The problem is that kids literally don't understand sex, they don't feel that kind of attraction yet.
Horseshit, I was thinking about doing anal with my classmates at 7 years old.

>>38617303
They are literally a type of cancer and they have started to infest this board.

File: 0f2.png (317KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 500x375px

>>38628425
Nope haha, I'm not in Canada or USA, stay mad my man

File: boys are icky.gif (1MB, 245x300px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 245x300px

So in a perfect world where you sick pedos could fuck whoever you wanted regardless of age....Why would a girl choose you over Chad Chadington? What makes you think a girl of ANY age would rather take pedo NEET dick then Chad's?

You have nothing to offer women in the current sexual climate. Are you going to make the case that "slutty" teens or preteens owe you sex too?

>>38632631
>>38632631
We're only robots because pedophilia is illegal.

>>38628484

The Bible says that puberal signs show sexual maturity.

Read Ezekiel 16.

>>38634026

pubertal*

>>38633644
Pedophilia is legal though

Daily reminder that pedophilic relationships were normal a couple hundred years ago.

>>38632631
Hmm, does that count as sexual assault or sexual contact with a minor seeing as he kissed her?

File: 1f4bcbe83081262cf93b4a926be162ea.jpg (1MB, 1244x1760px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1244x1760px

>>38618457
not in bulgaria senpai