Well /r9k/,

I'm not solving that shit

>>38601188
Reformat it in a clear way, don't do bad math.

56 nfghthrthrth

10, I see your jewish bedmas trickery

>>38601188
Fifty Eight is the only correct answer

>>38601188
10
PEMDAS nugga

Who the fucking fuck sticks 2(3) right next to each other, way the fuck away from the division symbol?

It's like you retards want to be misinterpreted by other retards.

58 is correct. The people saying 10 are retarded and learned pemdas wrong

10. How the fuck can someone mess up? It's really simple.

>>38601248
>Parentheses
>Exponents
>Multipilcation/Division [From left to right]
>Addition/Subtraction [From left to right]

>Parentheses
None. 2(3) is just '2 * 3'
>Exponents
6^2 = 36

>36 / 2 * 3 + 4

>Multiplication/Division [From left to right]
36 / 2 = 18

> 18 * 3 + 4
18 * 3 = 54

>54 + 4

>Addition/Subtraction [From left to right]
54 + 4 = 58

>58

The only correct answer is that the person who wrote it is an idiot who doesn't know how to use parentheses

>>38601188 (OP)
Explained with BIDMAS/PEMDAS for the brainlets:
>6^2 / 2(3) + 4
add brackets for clarity
>((6^2)/(2(3)))+4
>((6^2)/6)+4
>6+4
>10

You have to deal with the 2(3) as a single term, since it isn't formatted as 2*3. If it were, you'd get 58, but it's quite clearly wrong, since you deal with the parentheses 2(3) first and foremost.

do your own homework faggot
and this board is 18+

>>38601188
36/2*3+4
18*3+4
54+4
58
Anything else is wrong

>>38601427
mathfag here, can confirm this is correct

>>38601344
Wrong.

P E M D A S
>Parentheses
>Exponents
>Multipilcation [From left to right]
>Division [From left to right]
>Addition [From left to right]
>Subtraction [From left to right]

>Parentheses
None. 2(3) is just 2 * 3
>Exponents
6^2 = 36

Multiplication
2x3=6

>Division
36/6 = 6

>Addition
6+4=10

>10

>>38601477
Prove that you are a math major

>>38601188
6^2=36 divided by 2x3+4=3.6

>>38601427
You monkey. 2(3) Is not (2(3))

Why does everyone always get triggered by stupid shit like this? Name ONE scenario where someone writes an equation like in the OP

>>38601553
you haven't handled the 3 in parentheses yet, so you do it before the division

>>38601556
I feel like this is a pretty common expression tbqh.

>>38601582
The 3 in parentheses is just a regular 3 you imbecile.

>>38601248
This guy is right, fifty eight is the answer. Multiplication and division don't take precedence over each other, they are done left to right. PEMDAS is a little misleading, as it could be PEDMAS and still work.

>>38601556
I know you think you could just say
>Hey, did you mean "6^2 / (2 * 3) + 4" or "6^2 / 2 * 3 + 4"?
but have you ever spoken to your average mathematician before?

>>38601611
no it's not. it's a factor for 2 * 3
you cant move on until the parentheses are gone

>>38601604
Really? Give a single source of an expression that uses parentheses for multiplication while making you use PEDMAS for the order, that isn't just people arguing about it on the internet. I GUARANTEE you won't find anything but more bait posts on various websites.

21

Orgigie

>>38601188
The answer is 3.6 niggie

Oregano Spaghetti-o

>>38601509
Multiplication and division are done in order of occurrence you brainlet

>>38601663
3 is not an expression in this scenario, only a number. The parentheses are there to determine that the 3 is being multiplied by the 2 and is a separate entity

File: Screenshot_20170724-172502.png (199KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1080x1920px

>>38601188
This is objectively the correct answer. Anything else is wrong and you know it.

>>38601611
No it isn't. It's in parentheses, therefore you have to handle it before you handle everything else in this expression.
This is because the 2 has been removed from the parentheses. Take, for example, the way you would handle 3(x + 4) / 2(x + 3); you don't go
>3 * (x + 4)
>Ans / 2
>Ans * (x + 3)
do you?

>>38601188
10 is the correct answer OP.

10. I fucking hate math don't make me do this

>>38601678
Any source you can find of an expression that uses parentheses for multiplication while making you use PEDMAS for the order, is just people arguing about it on the internet/bait posting

You're absolutely right tbqh.
Doesn't change the fact that I still feel like this is a pretty common expression.

>>38601726
Agreed.
I initially answered 10 but I clearly see I was treating 2(3) as (2*3) rather than just 2*3.

6^2 / 2(3) + 4 = 58
6^2 / (2*3) + 4 = 10

>>38601740
Ah crap... now I'm swinging back the other way.
36/2x were x = 3

Formatted properly the equation is (6^2) / (2*3) + 4
>(6^2)/(2*3)+4
>(36)/(6)+4
>(6)+4
>10

BODMAS, PEDMAS and whatever the fuck else your high school maths teacher called it is a reference point at best, a sham at worst. Solve the functions within the big function, then solve the big function itself, simple.

File: 1489867572539.png (12KB, 205x246px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 205x246px

>>38601705
I got the same answer, I think it's wrong

>>38602058
How the fuck?

Could you show us your work?

>>38602023
>I reformatted it so my instinct is the objectively correct answer

It's 58, Parenthesis applies to doing the operation inside the parens.

Evaluate the parenthesis, in this case it evaluates to 3, then do all else in order (multiply and divide are the same level so left to right determines)

6^2 / 2 * 3 + 4
58

>>38602023
but it's not formatted as (2(3)), it's formatted as 2(3) so 58 is correct

you can't just assume that it's formatted like that just because the spacing is weird and you generally don't show multiplication in this situation.

Any of you niggers saying 10 would say 58 if the equation was

6^2 / 2(1 + 2) + 4

File: showyourwork.png (10KB, 800x565px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 800x565px

>>38602113
WHAT DID I DO WRONG

I CAN'T DO SIXTH GRADE MATH RIGHT LAUGHINGGIRLS.JPG

File: adsfed.png (2KB, 220x101px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 220x101px

>>38602148
That's also equal to 58

Answer is 58. You people can't be this uneducated right?

>>38602148
no i wouldnt
it still comes to 2(3)

>>38602191
Why did you add...
before you divided...
?

File: Untitled.png (2KB, 153x78px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 153x78px

>>38602203
This is how the computer reads it, retard

The correct answer is 10

>>38602191
You didn't follow the order of operations

>>38602203
>Relying on a calculator
OK, anon... OK...

>>38602203
That's the point

>>38602244
u r wee todded

10 due to PEMDAS.

10 I think, because Order of Operations.

Please note that I absolutely SUCK at math, so I'm not sure if I'm correct.

>>38601188
If you're being a stickler for the order of operations it would be ((6^2)/2)*3 + 4 = 58.
However you'd probably pick up from context that the author ignored convention and used the spacing to indicate 2(3) was evaluated before the division and get (6^2) / (2*3) + 4 = 10.

>>38601740
Yes you do. It would have to be (3(x + 4)) / (2(x + 3)) to do it the way you're suggesting

>>38602275
>This is how the computer reads it retard
That's because that is the correct way to do it. Computers are specifically good at doing math based on a set of rules. Those rules are always correct no matter how much you try to justify being wrong. You're retarded.

>>38602294
Instead of what? Your highschool dropout education? The rules are simple, Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication or Division from left to right, Addition or subtraction from left to right. Stop making excuses for being a retard.

>>38601188

It's 10. Any faggots that disagree are brainlets.

>>38601344
>>Parentheses
>None. 2(3) is just '2 * 3'

And this is where you're wrong, my nigga.

Parentheses first no matter what. You cant just say "this doesnt count lol, its just multiplication." Teacher says FUCK YOU NIGGER. F-

>>38602409
>>38602433
PARENTHESES
>36 / 6 + 4
>6 + 4
>10

>>38601710
It is clearly specified in the way that the problem is written out that the 2 and 3 are meant to be multiplied together

>>38602294
You think you're better at math than a computer? They are literally made to do math.

>>38601188
10, that did not require a brain cell

>>38601344
brainlets kys

File: sketch-1500944261195.png (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>38602125
>>38602134
I did not format 'instinctively', all mathematics follows a clear set of conventions which I formatted according to. OP formatted ambitiously in order to.sow confusion and be a massive faggot, I reformatted correctly to arrive at the solution. Pick related is my working.

>>38602409
>Your highschool dropout education?
>mfw I go to fucking Cambridge
It always gets like this when the burgers wake up.

File: IMG_4703.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>for the brainlets relying on a goddam computer/ calculator to do their work...

>>38602504
Okay, so autocorrect fucked me up there a bit. OP formatted ambiguously, not ambitiously - although you could argue that he did format ambitiously so long as his ambition was to be a faggot.

>>38602553
i have that same poorfag calculator kek

>>38602595
>gets the job done
Why bother getting an expensive one?

>>38602612
I had to get a more expensive one for my calculus classes but I still prefer to use it

>>38602612
conspicuous consumption my nigga
diamond encrust muh calc to get teh bitches wet af

File: FeelsGoodMan.jpg (4KB, 117x126px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 117x126px

>>38602553

>MFW my answer was actually correct for once without the aid of a calculator

I'm a math brainlet no more.

>>38601251
That's not how PEMDAS works dumbass

>>38602457
It's not clearly specified, that's the whole point you mongoloid

>>38602660
Congrats. You have ascended. Now laugh at these weak brainlets. Laugh at their feeble minds!

File: 1487887787414.png (92KB, 1440x706px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1440x706px

>>38602553
>>38602660
Wolfram Alpha disagrees

>>38602647
can i get a translation on your nigger talk

File: u rite nao.jpg (398KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 800x800px

>>38602727
Expenditure on or consumption of luxuries on a lavish scale in an attempt to enhance one's prestige

>>38602720
This would be marked incorrect on a test and when you took it to your professor and said "but muh Wolfram" your professor would shake their head, explain the concept of PEMDAS to you, and then later regret that schools now allow niggers and spics in

>>38602720

Well Wolfram is FUCKING GAY so their answer doesn't matter.

>>38602455
You're supposed to do whats IN parentheses first, 2(3) is literally the same as 2*3.

>>38601253
niggers, that's who.

>>38602660
This is literally middle school level. Can you do calculus, nigger? Explain to me what's a limit.

>>38601726
you write like a faggot.

>>38602720
you did not write it in correctly. brainlets BTFO how will they ever recover

File: james.png (44KB, 658x662px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 658x662px

>>38601188
pls write your 6's better, I thought that was a 10 and I got scared

>>38602751
Thank you kind citizen.

File: 20131119_BT_COM_MBK_022_29664147_COMPACT_MORNING_I1.jpg (35KB, 620x342px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 620x342px

>>38601188
58, but whoever formatted this equation needs to be shot in the kneecaps until they do it concisely.

t. math major

>>38601188
Nothing hard about multiplying dividing and adding

6^2/2(3)+4
36/2*(3)+4
36/6+4
6+4
10

>>38602849
>Explain to me what's a limit.

When you're so fed up with useless math you will never use (calculus) that there will eventually be a limit to your patience before you drop out of the class.

>>38602909
>math major
take the eq to a prof, ask them for the sol and an exp
giggle.

>>38602925
I'm in calculus ll right now. You will use it if you are studying STEM

File: D95895E1-0CC2-46C3-9788-7D9EBEB758E9-261-0000002B0AD6E3DE.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>>38602909
>math major

>>38602909
>t. math major
>gets an elementary math problem wrong
whoa... so this.... is the power.... of community college... damn...

File: 1489935403005.png (129KB, 724x611px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 724x611px

>>38602909
>t. math major
I take it as you're going to drop out soon? Kek.

>>38601188
If you follow PEMDAS then multiplication precedes division....So 10

why because division is a derivative function of multiplication (Inversion) just as subtraction is a derivative function of addition (adding a negative)

>>38602775
Says the nigger/spic. PEMDAS isn't fixed.
Parentheses
Exponents
Multiplication
OR
Division
Addition
OR
Subtraction

File: large.png (263KB, 500x516px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 500x516px

>>38602964
>>38602989
>>38602999
>>38603005

Hello brainlets. Since the proof is already posted in this thread, and me repeating it probably won't convince you, take a peek at this:

http://aconlinemath.com/this-problem-drove-my-facebook-crazy/

You might want to click the "need math tutoring" link at the bottom if you still can't wrap your brain around it. Oh, and when I say "math major" I mean "graduated math major." I'm working at a software company making 70k a year.

It's okay though, the world needs ditch diggers.

This is for any brainlet that doesn't understand 1st grade math. http://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-pemdas-definition-rule-examples.html

>>38603145
I only ditch digs for niggers

and you're still wrong, nigger.

Feed the crows

>>38603145
Ha-hah!
If you truly are graduating as a math major then the education system has gone to fucking shit.
The truth is, the answer is 10. Get over it, you were wrong and lied to make people believe you.

>>38602876
What did I write incorrectly?

File: 1488440484453.jpg (45KB, 634x650px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 634x650px

>>38603145
>graduated math major

>>38603145
>does exponents first, blatantly ignoring the parenthetical implied multiplication
shit-tier blog site, kill yourself shill

>>38602878
> and I got scared

>>38602275
If that is how the computer reads it then 58 is the actual answer
also for everyone the only things that actually exist in maths are parenthesis, addition and fractions, simplify it to those and it is easy.
BIDMAS is complete shit

File: Untitled.png (14KB, 1228x691px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 1228x691px

>>38603259
Oh for fucks sake forgot the illustration

>>38603145
Thanks Anon. I stand corrected

>>38603274
This is wrong because you need to multiple 2*3 before dividing. Are you just going to ignore the parenthesis?

Jesus Christ. Fucking brainlets. I cannot believe you fuckers passed pre-algebra. Consider dropping out and flipping burgers for the successful folks (me).

>>38603319
This.
How can brainlets ignore the 2*3?

>>38601188
10 nigga desu

>>38601316
>>38601344

58 is the right answer. Most people remember PEMDAS but forget/don't know to work left to right on the "MD" part. The equation is purposely written in a confusing format >>38601233


The way this picture is written also manipulates the person to get it wrong because it isolates 2(3) apart from the division sign

It's ten, isn't it?

>>38603294
>>38603145
original samefag cuck

File: scren.png (8KB, 525x71px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 525x71px

>>38601238
>>38601248
>>38601316
>>38602108
>>38602125
>>38602134

correct

>>38603319
ur a dumbass

iringales

>>38603258
it can spook you when you expecting a small number and you get a ten

>>38603145
2(3) is not a multiplication step
it is a parentheses operation
otherwise, it should have been written as 2 x 3

File: Screenshot_2017-07-24-18-47-36.png (132KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 720x1280px

:-)

Nibba shlubababa

>>38603446
>>38602553
Better start on that Wendy's application

>>38602855
Yeah well, let's see your penmanship then

>>38602673
It is how it works. You're the dumbass.

>>38603319
>This is wrong because you need to multiple 2*3 before dividing

You are wrong. 2(3) can be written as 2 * 3, and multiplication and division are of the same precedence, so you evaluate from left to right. P in PEMDAS means you evalutate things INSIDE parentheses first, there is only a number inside the parentheses, nothing to evaluate first.

>>38601188
easy. 6.

>>38603481
>amerifag
Yeah okay

>>38603507
https://www.wendys.com/en-us/about-wendys/restaurants-around-the-world

You're dumber than I thought. Typical eurofag.

>pic related
Btw, I knew that the solution was 10, but just needed to make sure.

>>38603319
again it isn't 2*3 that is just a weird abstraction of 2(3) which has 2 different elements 2*3 is just a singular number 2(3) is 3 modified by 2 keeping the both separate.
You cant argue with google when it comes to maths

File: Screenshot from 2017-07-24 21-50-40.png (21KB, 1029x323px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 1029x323px

>>38603540
Forgot to add pic.

oooo

>>38603545
>trusting corporations over common sense
good goy

>>38603545
Then explain >>38603481
also
>You cant argue with google
>believing what the jews tell you
wew lad

File: 1492467127570.png (293KB, 778x702px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 778x702px

>>38601188
6^2 / 2(3) + 4 =
36 / 2 * 3 + 4 =
18 * 3 + 4 =
54 + 4 =
58

how can an idiot argue with this? PEMDAS bitches

File: IMG_20170724_205142.jpg (40KB, 853x640px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 853x640px

>>38603484
Fat people truly are disgusting.

>>38603526
>dumb amerifag
Wendy's pulled out of the UK in the year 2000. Get your head out of your ass.

>>38603628
>PEMDAS bitches
>fails to do parentheses
wow

>>38603503
>evaluate from left to right
wrong. exponents, then solve 2 * 3 then divide. multiplication comes first

>>38603572
Your error is an input error, you are putting both 2 and 3 in the denominator when only the 2 is there. 2(3) = 2 * 3. I think there is where you brainlets are getting confused.

You see how the 2(3) is written like that? That means it's actually a six. That means the answer is ten.

>>38603680
>multiplication comes first

Wrong. Multiplication has the same precedence as division.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations

>>38603442
No, if it were a parentheses step, it'd look like this (2 x 3). Jesus Christ, you 10fags need to go back to the 1st grade. No fucking wonder on why you're here.

>>38603674
>fails to do parentheses

Fail to do what? That is not a sentence.

There is no math expression inside of the parentheses, it is already at it's simplest form (3).

>>38603671
>implying UK shithole matters
It's still in other parts of the world you dumb sack of shit. I literally hate the British. You people are intolerable and look smelly all of the time. Get fucked.

>>38603726
>what is a parenthetical expression

>>38603745
see >>38603754
It's astounding how retarded people are
The answer is 10, case closed

>>38603745
How can you not understand that what's inside the parenthesis is being multiplied? It's SIX!!

>>38603754
Something that has nothing to do with math, and instead grammar, kek, fucking dumb ass.

>>38601188
It's 58
>exponents
>multiplication and division, left to right
>addition and subtraction, left to right

Is that a 10 or a 6?

>>38603726
Inside or outside the parenthesis, the two is still being multiplied by the three.
>go back to the 1st grade
You're not taught this until 7th grade. Idiot.

>>38603746
>I was wrong so I will sperg out
Nice one.

File: 1489798669661.jpg (25KB, 641x530px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 641x530px

>>38603726
>No fucking wonder on why you're here.
you're....you're literally here too..

Holy shit you fucking retards. Written correctly it should look like this, where those that grouped together are done left to right.

P/E/MD/AS

2(3), which can also be written as 2 * (3), is not a parenthetical operation due to one of the agents being outside of the parenthesis. It should be treated as a multiplication process, which means that it would come immediately after the 6^2 is divided by 2. Thus the answer is 58.

>>38603785
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Syj8FVr7vbM
wew fucking lad

>>38603745
Now imagine it was not a 3, but an arbitrary placeholder value like A.

6^2/2A + 4 is not going to be 36/2 * A + 4, it's going to be 36/2A + 4.

Basically, it's 10.

File: 1432724756686s.jpg (7KB, 250x241px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x241px

If people knew how to use proper fractions instead of ambiguous symbols, then we wouldn't have these retarded problems. but no...

>>38603803
What was I wrong on? Wendy's is not only in the USA. I said eurofag because you people are usually the first to say amerifag. Shove a chip up your ass and kys.

>>38603820
In fact, the format of the original equation in OP implies that the 3 is actually a substitution in an algebra equation.

>>38603807
The irony when retards call other people retards.

File: 1425930293288.jpg (93KB, 500x300px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 500x300px

>>38602673
That's exactly how PEMDAS works faggot.
The answer is 10.

>>38603807
DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY YOU SUBHUMAN NIGGERSPICCHINK

>>38603820
>Basically, it's 10.
You drew your conclusion out of nowhere,

Explain how you think you got from 36/2A + 4. to 10

(Tip, you didn't because A has no value).

>>38603940
A does have a valuer here, the value is 3.
Understand?

>>38603804
Of course I am. I'm here for different reasons. Just because some people in a group are retards, it doesn't mean that all of the people in the group are retards.

>>38603795
>You're not taught this until 7th grade. Idiot.
That explains why you don't know this, you were in special classes.

File: 1491855066694.png (158KB, 500x442px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 500x442px

>>38603972
>Just because some people in a group are retards, it doesn't mean that all of the people in the group are retards
>I'm different I swear!

>>38603972
Calm down anon you just did a juvenile math problem. Making it sound like you're the next Einstein Coming from another 58'r

2(3) is not notationally equivalent to 2 * 3

>>38603994
Nope. I took regular classes and never had to repeat. If you think kids are taught this in first grade you're completely retarded.

>>38603893
You're gonna have a hard time in math if that's how you think it works.

>>38603572
Google "6^2 / 2(3) + 4"

>>38604013
I'm not smarter than any other normal person. It's just stupid that people actually believe that the answer to this is 10.

If you even need to use PEMDAS you've written a stupid fucking expression
t. actual mathematician

>>38604019
Why didnt my teacher say this? >tfw finally Enlightened

>>38604039
I learned this in the first grade. Many schools have different curriculums.

>>38604117
>t. actual mathematician

Why must people lie?

>>38601188
100.
62 divided by 2 is 31. 31 times 3 is 96. 96 plus 4 is 100.

the fact that no one here could get the right answer just really shows you the downfall of this country's education system

The answer is 10.

>>38604265

Someone finally figured it out. Wew, I thought I was the only smart one here.

>>38601663
t. pre-algebra student

>>38604305
Must be just you and me anon. I have an IQ of 130 so I find it difficult to relate to normal people

>>38602058
Nah man I think its right
6^2/2(3)+4
36/2(3)+4
36/6+4
36/10
3.6
That's just my way of doing it

>>38602275
How can you possibly be this retarded?

>>38604504
I feel you man. It's hard to find like-minded people in a world of brainlets. How can they not see the answer is 100?

It's 58.

If you get 10, you're legitimately braindead.
t. Berkeley student

File: screenshot.png (28KB, 778x528px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 778x528px

>>38604019
Yes it is. Do you think you are smarter than the people at Google?

>>38604930
>t. Berkeley student
I go to MIT, an objectively better university. The answer is 10.

>>38604965
>do you think you are smarter than Jews?
Yes.

File: 1481849184551.jpg (1MB, 4602x3852px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4602x3852px

>>38603376
>>38601344

jesus, these threads always bring out the brainlets on /r9k/ it's hilarious

it's like I'm posting on 4chan with a bunch of niggers

File: ecchh.png (292KB, 490x473px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 490x473px

>>38604582
No one would actually do this.

>>38605011
You must be a nigger if you think that, thus, your opinion is discarded.

>>38605034
Who owns Google, faggot?

/sci/ is making fun of us

by the way, everyone there agrees that the answer is 58

>>38605059
I wasn't disagreeing with you in that Jews own google, I was pointing out the obvious being that you are not smarter than the Jews. You are a house pet to them.

>>38605011
>Do you think your expertise is worth more than a unthinking program on google?

Beyond doubt.

>>38605082
t. /r9k/ brainlet

>>38605082
>using /sci/ for credibility
/sci/ is full of brainlets

BIMDAS, you fucking inbreds.
2(3) takes first priority since its in brackets
Then 6^2 since it's an indice
Then you're left with 36/6 + 4
Which equals 10

>>38605166
behold, american education

>>38605166
Nobody has ever heard of bimdas, PEMDAS is the master race.

>>38605166
2(3)=2x3 bro and there are no [brackets]

>>38605166
>since its in brackets
only 3 is in brackets, if the expression was written as (2*3) you would be right, but it's not, it's 2(3) which == 2 * 3

>brainlet detection image
Works every time

>>38603680
You don't have to multiply, you can divide 36 one by one with 2 and 3

>36/2*3
>18/3
>6

Or

>36/2*3
>12/2
>6

>>38605181
America has some of the best universities in the world.

>>38603376
>Exponents and Parentheses come before MD
silly brainlet.

>>38605166
>>38605194
it's BEDMAS you moonbouncing fucks

i vant to die

>>38605261
>trying to mock the superior Americans for actually reaching the moon

uh, ok sweatie.

trust me its 58, my dad works at nintendo

>>38601509
Another acronym is BEDMAS. Multiplication and division have the same order. >>38601344 is right.

>>38601188
36/2(3)+4=58

"Thirty-six halves times three, add four"

File: its58.png (26KB, 955x503px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 955x503px

It's 58

File: 324702y.jpg (87KB, 678x678px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 678x678px

>>38604053
>YoU're gONna HaVE a hArD TIme iN MaTh iF ThAt's HoW yOu tHiNk It wOrkS

Fuck off brainlet.

File: 1490526411139.png (770KB, 588x559px) Image search: [Google]

770KB, 588x559px

>>38606168
HAHAHAAHAHA OISJFSDVOIJ

>>38606168
people still use this meme? rofl

>math is done left to right
this is false, if you tried to write this in any academic setting someone would tell you to reformat it

Though informally, it is usually solved left to right, that's not how math is usually completed.

>>38601188
calculators and smartphones have brought the average intelligence of a person down to dangerous levels, anyone who got anything other than 10 needs to start paying attention in their remedial mathematics classes because you're a fucking moron.

>>38601509
multiplication is division and vice versa, therefore you have to do both of them as they come from left to right.

2/3 = 2*1/3

>>38606259
>brought the average intelligence of a person down to dangerous levels
>other than 10
jesus christ anon

File: 1499939010846.jpg (9KB, 241x261px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 241x261px

>>38606270
>multiplication is division and vice versa
interdasting, never considered this or addition being subtraction with negatives I guess

>>38606209
people still say rofl? kys oldfag

>>38606316
subtraction is addition with negatives**

>>38601253
that's the whole point

op is a trolling faggot

File: brainlets.png (592KB, 1017x582px) Image search: [Google]

592KB, 1017x582px

I rewrote the question in a less confusing way so that maybe you morons can stop saying 10 and finally see it...

>>38606321
people still say kys? LMAOO

Why are the fucking parentheses even there, you misleading piece of shit?

If wolfram alpha says its 58, its 58 nigga

>>38606168
Holy shit embarassing

Go back to twitter you retarded tween faggot

Is it 10? please respond i wanna know and if not tell me why

>>38606394
Thank you for the clarification ORIGINAL POSTER

that fucking parenthesis i swear to god

>>38606409
people literally say kys more than rolf. i can tell you're one of the brainlets that got this question wrong.
>LMAOO
cringe.

>>38606447
>>38606563
without paranthesis you wouldn't know to multiply it, if anything it needs more paranthesis

>>38606394
>1/2 in place of 2
Jesus Christ, what, is your IQ nonexistent?

>>38606615
there is no way someone is this retarded, it has to be on purpose

>>38606615
Dividing by 2 is the same as multiplying by 1/2.

>>38606615
>anon never learned how to divide and multiply fractions

>>38606544
Please anons, i wanna know why is 58

File: 1498488243254.jpg (101KB, 1024x904px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1024x904px

>>38606632
>Dividing by 2 is the same as multiplying by 1/2.
No, it's not. 2 and 1/2 are completely different numbers.

Please stop trolling you're going to confuse the people actually trying to understand this problem.

How the fuck are people getting 58?

Do they not know what a division symbol is?

PEMDAS

P - parenthesis: Since 3 is in the parenthesis by itself, this step does not count
E - exponent: 6^2 is 36. We now have 36 / 2(3) + 4
M - multiply: 2(3) is 2 times 3, which is 6. We now have 36 / 6 + 4
D - divide: 36 divided by 6 is 6. We now have 6 + 4
A - add: 6 plus 4 equals 10. We're left with 10.
S - subtract: There was no subtraction in this equation, so it's still 10

The answer is 10, brainlets.

>>38606660
Anon i got 10 too but Google say it's 58, i think we're wrong

File: elementary_school_math.png (7KB, 772x340px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 772x340px

>>38606615
I love wasting my time explaining elementary school arithmetic to retards. Feels like I'm contributing to society.

How the hell is this not 10?

>>38606660
This is the only real answer. Holy fuck, thank you for clarifying that. These brainlets keep saying there is nothing in parentheses to simplify, no fucking shit, but it still needs to be multiplied by two and according to PEMDAS multiplication is done BEFORE dividing. I have literally been in this thread for hours and you faggots are still incapable of understanding basic math, get fucked retards. I'm out.

>>38606659
8 / 2 = 4
8 * .5 = 4

Really tickles my popsicle

>>38606660
>>38606681
>>38606701

your first mistake was memorising acronyms instead of actually learning how it works

>>38606681
Someone literally put it in their calculator and got 10.

I think Google is purposely putting 58 to confuse us.

>>38606737
Fuck i just wanna solve this and understand it too

>>38606687
Why are you bringing in variables now? The OP has no variables...

>>38606717
You're wrong, for the 50th time.

https://www.mathsisfun.com/operation-order-pemdas.html

>>38606660
>M - multiply: 2(3) is 2 times 3, which is 6. We now have 36 / 6 + 4

This is where you fucked up

>>38606717
you're actually the retard here for not only relying on an acronym as a crutch, but also misunderstanding the acronym

>>38606737
Several people put it in calculators and showed 58, only one guy with an old casio got 10, he probably programmed it to do that.

i fucking hate you retards its 58 now suck my dick

>>38606766
Explain please i wanna solve this, i'm shit at maths (not the same anon btw)

>>38606794
>implying his dicket is suckable

>>38606756
That's not even a credible website. It's a troll.

>>38606659
Most retarded post in the thread, which is a pretty difficult accomplishment

>6^2 / 2(3) + 4
>36 / 2(3) + 4
>18 (3) + 4
>54 + 4
>58

>>38601188
Use decent math formatting faggot

>>38606797
6^2 / 2(3) + 4 =
36 / 2 * 3 + 4
= 18 * 3 + 4 =
54 + 4 =
58

How can I possibly be more clear?

>>38606766
If that wasn't the correct order of operations, it would be called PEDMAS

As it stands, it's called PEMDAS, and since the M comes before the D, you multiply BEFORE you divide.

>>38606797
>https://www.mathsisfun.com/operation-order-pemdas.html
PEMDAS says that if there is multiplication and division in a problem you solve them left to right. You would do the division first because it comes first in the problem.

>>38601427
>doesnt understand the difference between (2(3)) and 2(3)

>>38606823
>>38606828
Thanks anons, you're actually helping me out

>>38606827
see: https://www.mathsisfun.com/operation-order-pemdas.html

multiplication and division have equal precedence, evaluate from left to right.

>>38606578
>rolf
>cringe
cringe.

>>38606828
You still need to solve parenthesis first anon.
>>38606844
No, he's wrong and we are right. Solve what is with parenthesis first, which is the 2(3).

>>38606854
>making a big deal out of a typo
once again, kys roastie.

>>38606864
Who the fuck is right? I got 10 and got 58 too, which one is correct? please don't lie to me

>>38606827
>b-but the acronym h-has the M before the D

you're such a sheep holy shit. learn to think for yourself

>>38606864
>You still need to solve parenthesis first anon.
There is nothing to solve in parentheses, there is a 3 lol...

>>38606864
There are no parenthesis in this problem though? That's multiplication isn't it?

>>38606881
I'm getting 10 I don't know why these guys keep saying it's 58. I understand we multiply from left to right, but you also solve parentheses first.

>>38606884
A 3 being multiplied by 2... you literally can't just ignore that. Wow.

>>38606925
Who is ignoring it? You are barely coherent. You multiply the 2*3 in the correct oder, you don't skip right to it just because it's written as 2(3) instead of 2*3, they mean the same thing.

If it was (2*3) you would be right, but it's not.

>>38606925
the 2 is outside the brackets, not inside. you only solve the inside of the brackets first, but there's nothing in there to solve. just a solitary 3

File: 1497338389310.png (2KB, 110x48px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 110x48px

this is text that exists only because you cannot make a post on /r9k/ without text

>>38606951
This anon is correct. I've seen multiplication written three different ways and I'm almost positive it's only to fuck with people.

>>38601188
58. Exponent first, then do the division/multiplication from left to right (since the 2 isn't in the parentheses you don't multiply it by 3 before dividing 36 by it). Then add the 4.

I guess 58-anons are right after all, thanks for explaining it to me

>>38606968
I don't see a * in the OP

>>38607040
It's the same thing anyways, the answer was 58, i'm enlightened now

anyone that's still stubborn enough to answer 10 at this point needs to just turn off the computer and go to bed

>>38607083
Are you saying that Google is wrong?

File: 1486779177001.png (3KB, 207x53px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 207x53px

>>38607040
Because OP has incorrect formatting

>>38606915
It's a really devious way to throw in a standard multiplication problem.Type the problem into Google's calculator as 6^2 / (2(3)) + 4 which will receive 10 as an answer. 6^2 / 2(3) + 4 receives 58 because it's... I dunno', it's a devious way to insert a standard multiplication stage.

>6^2 / (2(3)) + 4 = 10
>6^2 / 2(3) + 4 = 58

>>38607101
you tell me
https://www.google.ca/webhp#q=6^2/2(3)%2B4

>>38607179
Oh i read that wrong, i thought you were saying that 10 was the answer

>>38607134
what is the name of this shitty calculator

>>38601188
It's 10 how could anyone get this wrong.

File: 1500264364390.jpg (17KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 400x400px

>>38607155
I...I understand now.
>mfw I'm in calculus lll and got this wrong

>>38607244
Well fi someone in Calculus III can get this wrong, i guess i'm not that bad

File: 1498231958263.png (50KB, 296x272px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 296x272px

>>38607155

Brainlets BTFO.

I knew from the start the answer was 58. Kek. That's what happens when you wagecuck your life away.

>>38607155
Why did you make this post?

>hurr if you change the expression then you get 10!

Wow, remarkable!

File: 1499746184508.png (11KB, 411x387px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 411x387px

>mfw this thread is still up

How the fuck is this even debatable?

>>38607267
Yeah, don't need you to make me feel worse.

>>38601533
Yeah, thats's what I got as well.

>>38607301
Haha brainlet :^) :^) :^)
don't worry anon, it's okay, everyone makes mistakes

When I put it on my calculator it says 10.

>>38607206
literally right above the math stuff

answer is 5.

>>38607285
I'm merely pointing out the reason several failed to understand the problem. It is better they see it then to consistently get the wrong answer. It was only showing some people the visual they are writing an entirely different equation in their head hence the wrong answer.

>>38606544
How many times must this be explained? You calculate whatever is ------->IN<-------- the parenthesis first, which is just a fucking 3, thus 2(3) is literally just 2*3. Then you just do it left to right, exponent first, then division and multiplication (equal in the hierarchy). This is really some american """" education""""" -the thread

>>38608260
why cant people explain things nicely?

>>38608260
Thanks for the explanation but don't get mad at me, i'm just bad at maths and forget a lot of stuff

>>38606659
Bless your fucking heart I hope you are trolling. It's okay to not know something, please, please, please, at least be >18 and I'll forgive you

>>38601188
The answer is ten.

File: 157474.png (225KB, 547x423px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 547x423px

6^2 / 2(3) +4

36 / 6 + 4

6 + 4

10

originalio commentario

>>38607155
Wrong, the expression 2(3) represents a simplified factor of 6. It is not the same as 2*3. It's like the term 2x. Or like writing 3(1+2) instead of (3+6).

36 / 3(1+2)
36 / 3(3)
36/9
4, correct answer.

36 / 3(1+2)
36 / 3(3)
12(3)
36, wrong answer.

>>38609019
>Wrong, the expression 2(3) represents a simplified factor of 6. It is not the same as 2*3

Software engineers at Google disagree, but you must be smarter.

File: 1491259784273.jpg (15KB, 185x156px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 185x156px

>>38609019
>36 / 3(1+2)
>3(1+2)
>(1+2)
I honestly don't know what to say other than wow.

>>38605487
Kek

Also
>ctrl f, brainlet
26 results
>

The problem is the first three numbers in the numerical system all have two or less ways to add to them
1+0=1
1+1=2 2+0=2
2+1=3 3+0=3

Of they number in the parentheses (3) was higher ot would have one absolute answer.

>>38608468
Aww. Anon, I'm sorry. Don't let these half-brains get you down. The answer is relative. Whatever this equation is being applied to the answer 10 or 58 will have to make sense in the situation.

>>38606394
6 squared is 36.
0.5 multiplied by 3 is 1.5.
36/1.5 is 24.
24 added to 4 is 28

That's what you wrote. You can't have the parentheses.

>>38601188
6,2 / 6 + 4
36 x 6 + 4
216 + 4
=220

>>38601188
Is this a nigger test or a kid asking someone to do his homework?
Either way g8 b8 m8

>>38611283
I love how he posted that confidently, even naming the pic 'brainlets' without realizing what a huge mistake he just made. Toppestkek.

>>38611432
Even if you do go left to right the outcome would still be wrong.
6 to the second power is 36
36 multiplied by a half is 6
6 multiplied by 3 is 18.
18 added to 4 is 22

This joker made a completely new problem.

>>38601188
Who the fuck writes 6 like that. Holy shit dude were you dropped as a baby or something?

HoIy crap. It's 10 you dense regressions of humanity.

Start with the Parentheses. UNFACTOR the 3. What plus what will equal 3? 1+2. Distribute the 2 to the 1 and 2 in the parentheses. Then add them. THEN SOLVE THE G*D D*MN PROBLEM.

2(1+2)
2+4=6
6^2=36
36/6=6
6+4=10

I Just woke up. I'm dark skinned. And this STILL doesn't constitute as a brain teaser. you f*gs have no excuse.

>>38601188
36/6 + 4 = 6 + 4 = 10
Happen to have dyscalculia, but hopefully I'm doing better by now.

According to my calculations the answer is 10
6^2 = 36
2(3) = 6
36/6 = 6
6 + 4 = 10

Unless that is supposed to be 6 square rooted in which case
6sr2 = 2,45~
2(3) = 6
2.45~ / 6 = 0,41~
0,41~ + 4 = 4,41~

the ~ is there to mark that it's not completely accurate number (i added it 0,00 accuracy)

OP needs to work on his presentation of the problem

>>38601188
PEMDAS

6^2/2*3+4
=36/2+7
=36/9
=4

>>38611929
You forgot the order in which the formula is dissected
+ and - come last unless they are in ( )
( ) came first, ^2 and / come after
You done outted yourself nigger, less dindu and more school, READ NIGGER, REAAAAAD!!!!!!

>>38611785
little convoluted but you showed your work. A-.
>>38611992
Be honest. Is race really the problem or is it just a lack of listening and being able to follow simple instructions?

>>38612081
Well why does that problem seem to be black exclusive? they have schools too where they can learn this shit, the ghetto riff raff always bitch about schools but when put on the bench they are too stupid to learn jack shit
>"Our schools need more of them programs"
Problem isn't schools, problem is your kids are too fucking stupid to be taught anything apart from counting bills and ounces

>>38612160
So what about the exceptions? The outliers? What about the WHITES that go to the black majority schools. If it really is a race thing the caucasian kids should get the problems despite their surroundings the same way the black kids in prestigious schools won't get jack shite.

>>38601188
>that division symbol
ech

36
-- + 4 = 10
6

>>38612264
Well they are handicapped by the fact that the class is full of chimping dindus, and the black ones that can learn are mulatto anomalies

File: sdfdsf.png (4KB, 277x260px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 277x260px

>>38601188
36/10=3.6
1.unoriginal?
2.unoriginal again! how interesting

>>38612300
You're still trying to make it a race issue. It may sound cheesy but some people do learn differently than others.
Let's bring it full circle I guess. Sure maybe those single black mothers that say "My son/daughter is smart" could be exaggerating and it may just be intelligence relavent to the school. But surprisingly there are some blacks, Mexicans, Scottish folk that go to school to learn as best as they can. Coupled with the fact most ghetto schools have caucasian adults that make up 1/3 of the faculty.

>>38612378
nevermind im retarded.
it's 10

10
Brackets - 6^2 / 6 + 4
Exponents - 36 / 6 + 4
Division - 6 + 4
multiplication
addition - 10
subtraction
the answer is 10

>>38601188
>6^2:2(3)+4
>6^2:2x3+4
>6^2:6+4
>6^2:10
>36:10
>3.6
The answer is 3.6

[math] \displaystyle
6^2/2(3)+4 \\
36/2 \cdot 3+4 \\
18 \cdot 3+4 \\
54+4 \\
58
[/math]

>>38612407
>You're still trying to make it a race issue. It may sound cheesy but some people do learn differently than others
Tell me oh wise one, how do we reeeeach these kiiiiids? do the teacher need to start tap dancing and rapping the mathematics formulas to the kids so the differently abled black kids can finally learn how to count?

> But surprisingly there are some blacks, Mexicans, Scottish folk
For Mexicans i think it might be language barrier, i don't know why you would bring Scotts up but okay
And sure there are anomalies among the blacks that actually want to learn in school, but they are still gimped by the fact that they are black
Ghetto culture has made it so most of them don't even try and they can only blame themselves for making and glorifying that culture

>Coupled with the fact most ghetto schools have caucasian adults that make up 1/3 of the faculty.
translates to
>My kid is too fucking stupid to learn, must be because of them god damn white devils holding us down

If IQ tests are good at something it is to determine how well the ones that take them do in areas of logic, mathematics and physics
Which tend to be really weak for black people, i applaud the anomalies that managed to learn despite their handicap but that doesn't remove the fact that they generally have that handicap of being black and stupid

But lets ignore the race in relation to the problems in learning and just blame the schools right? that's what we've been doing all this time and look how well they are doing

Learn to write six

It's 10.

Not gonna argue with retards. If you disagree you can blow it out your ass.

>>38612521
I don't know, sir. I think it just comed down to people not looking for all the variables and exceptions and instead just seeing the general problem.

>>38612845
>comed
*comes

some retarded ass niggers itt desu senpai

File: 1444959115675.jpg (253KB, 2048x1447px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 2048x1447px

I love those threads, there something about brainlets being wrong that make me happy
It's 10 you fucking idiots, in every good collage 5 / 2(x) will be 5/2x not 2.5*x