what are your political beliefs?

>>38593029
>All this politics shilling

Can you guys just fuck off?

File: political compass.png (17KB, 473x484px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 473x484px

>>38593029
You're a fag orginally.

File: 2FpbOjlBCcy5IRwPS2xvsL4DKAFXxiO8hyGKbAar9d8.jpg (64KB, 728x530px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 728x530px

>>38593045
+1
this isn't even banter it's just sad

File: 8f4e8ceb72514b97553f78c1c84ed034.png (10KB, 419x366px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 419x366px

back and to the left

orig

>>38593029
i am a fasict libetarian civlians get fascism citizen get libertarism after service and the right to vote etc

File: berlin___soviet_war_memorial_by_pingallery-d4boltq.jpg (533KB, 1280x1745px) Image search: [Google]

533KB, 1280x1745px

>>38593069
were is there a fucking Soviet War Memorial dedicated to these communist scum bags?

File: 8 values.png (75KB, 813x605px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 813x605px

I'm a Center-left Nationalist with Libertarian Confederate Social Views.

ITT:
>people who think their political views actually matter or anyone cares

lel

>>38593597
>or anyone cares
OP asked for my political views so I assume he cares. you also cared enough to open he thread and post in it so there's definitely some caring going on

File: Screenshot_2017-07-12-15-37-45.png (51KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1080x1920px

>>38593029
Similar to yours

File: Autism1.png (208KB, 999x1206px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 999x1206px

>>38593029
I am unironically a National Socialist.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-12-15-37-50.png (158KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1080x1920px

>>38593641
Authoritarian capitalist according to spekr

File: Screenshot_2017-05-15-15-32-56~01.png (190KB, 1080x1194px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1080x1194px

Centre-left social libertarian w/ nationalistic tendencies pertaining to immigration.

File: download.png (86KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 800x600px

Libertarian Socialism

I believe that
>capitalism is a strong and necessary economical force
>that the markets should be strongly regulated to prevent unlimited growth, forcing diversification of investments in the long term
>that as a country gets richer it should aim through its institutions to continue to raise the bar for it's most basic offerings to society
>that the legal system should aim first to reform and educate, or failing that separate undesirables from the general population
>that education is a fundamental necessity and should be a primary focus for spending, because it is through a shared and uniform education/formative experience that a country's culture is formed, and without it the population is vulnerable to the encroachment of damaging foreign interests.

all these polls never really manage to make all those things work together

>>38593735
WE ALL CARE HAHAHAHAHAHA

jk we dont give a shit

>>38593721
>>38593710
>>38593660
>>38593659
>>38593318
>>38593072
>>38593048
>>38593029

hhAHAHAHahahhah WOW DUDE! You guys really are interesting, nice out of the box political ideals man! i REALLY care about all of these lOL! woW?? WTf? I care so much! we all do!

>>38593777
yeah you do you're in this thread!

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>38593029
Blue as can be

>>38593788
You obviously do since you replied

>>38593841
Wow. Taking a few seconds to type out a post sure is caring.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Is centrist the bestist?

>>38593940
You replied to the whole thread

>>38594046
Wow taking a few seconds to type out a post sure is caring lol

File: me political.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

And for some reason, 8values tells me I'm a fascist/capitalist fascist

>>38594117
The effort you put in to imply I'm wrong proves the opposite

File: 1.jpg (77KB, 1003x618px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1003x618px

>tfw too intelligent for ideology and parties.

>>38593597
>>38593777
>>38593788
>>38593940
>>38594117
thank you for your implicit interest

>>38594029
Hell yeah it is. It's the unit circle of politics.

File: pol.jpg (83KB, 959x718px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 959x718px

>>38593029
Here's mine and you should leave to /pol/
Here's a link to help you
>>>/pol/

National Socialism encourages class unity as opposed to class warfare or division. Everybody is dedicated to the preservation of the "social" environment in which the live, which carries with it their genes, beliefs and traditions. National Socialism supported private property, but not usury or things like monopolies and landlords owning an unreasonable amount of houses. These things put the interests of an individual before the health of the people, which also includes that individual. It is not healthy to be greedy. Nor is it healthy to be envious. It is healthy to live for one another, because everyone is a neighbor.

>>38594455
>Libertarian Technate
Objectively the best here.

>>38594477
Yeah but my teacher and the movies said the evil Nazis were the bad guys I think critically and skeptically about everything except for WW2 that is set in stone, no grey area, 100% the Germans were evil baby eating satanists.

File: chart[1].png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

I don't like these test because the lack of context and inability to be neutral ends up skewing the results.

>>38594710
Also every time I take one of these tests I'm always dead center left and right but wildly different places between Authoritarian and Libertarian

>>38594477
Fascism is morally wrong, Strong personal freedom is one of the most important pieces of society. Fascism doesn't guarantee this. Also you make it out that the NSDAP was some hyper progressive tolerant globalist movement, rather than the traditionalist nationalists that they were. They did look pretty cool though.

File: last ned.png (93KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 800x600px

Looks to be accurate

File: INTP-A Social liberalism (1).png (100KB, 1436x549px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1436x549px

Why is it that many people here are conservative?

>>38594853
>>38594905
Why socialism? I mean I agree three things must be protected, being the consumer, the worker, and the environment, but why socialism? It only fucks over the people who've worked hard to get to the top and infringes on our freedoms.

>>38594967
Infringes on your freedom, How so?

>>38594967
Lol, read a Wikipedia page about socialism first and whether or not we want socialism.

>>38594967
Wouldn't a free market be dominated by huge companies with big bucks, as smaler companies will get out competited?

>>38595055
Well, let's say I want to found my own little fast food joint. I pay my new workers my states minimum wage of 11, and my assistant managers and higher up officials a modest amount ranging from 15 to 25$ an hour. I give honest benefits, I have modest prices, and I have high quality food which I buy from eco friendly sources. I grow into a regional chain like Whataburger in Texas. I work hard and do honest labor. Why do I need to pay more taxes and have my business become heavily regulated by the government and have my profits be taken by the state? I have done nothing wrong, I treat my workers really well, I offer fair prices, my establishment has solar panels on the roof. I'm still punished for doing my passion. That's bullshit.

File: Landoshit.jpg (9KB, 296x216px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 296x216px

>>38595086
>>38594853
Is socialism. also
>Lol
You need to return

>>38595167
What makes you think that? And if the people and environment are given fair treatment by the corporation, what does it matter? Plus smaller companies always spring up and mom and pop stores will never die. They've been around for thousands of years.

>>38595168
You sure you're not thinking about communism?
How is paying taxes punishment?

>>38595168
Because you have money to pay for things such as free healthcare. You're business is allowed, but a certain share of the profits are taken with the threat of violence and distributed to the needy.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>38593029

Every political test I've taken say I would be into Social Liberalism, so I guess im that. I agree with them the most anyways.

>>38595272
How is it not? I make about 10 million dollars a year. I'm paying the set tax rate for society, let's use 10 percent for simplicity.
I'm still paying a million bucks income tax. Making me have a higher income tax rate than the average joe is unfair to me as a person and is discriminatory to me. It's classist.

>>38595362
Someone has to pay the taxes. :)

>>38595If you make 10 million a year, i doubt you're worried about money. And what's so wrong about looking out for your fellow man?

>>38595306
>Free healthcare.
Impossible unless slave labor is used. You still need to pay taxes for it to operate, and of which you end up paying more than with an insurance company because you are paying for dinguses that hit themselves with sledgehammers and neglect safety. Why do I have to pay for a imbecile to hurt himself when I'm in near perfect health?
>Distributed to the needy.
Private charity does that though. I'm not saying we should let our poor rot away, in fact I am for rehab of the homeless and I do give them my food in real life, but someone who actively refuses to contribute to society doesn't deserve to get support. Charities do that way better than a bureaucracy.

>>38595362
A person who makes 100 million dollars a year that then gets taxed at a rate of 35% has 65 million dollars, and takes home ~ 5 million dollars a month. Read: Still a lot of money
Simple as that.
Other people's needs come before a weathy man's wants.

>>38595408
Nothing. But it's still unfair. Nobody should be given favor in society. No race, social class, gender, age group, anyone. Everyone is equal and should be treated as such. No matter how you cut it, it's still discrimination against a social class. Sure they may be well off, but then again, they are still paying a million bucks in income tax.

File: chart (4).png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

I'm a socialist, but I think that socialism could only work in a country that's at least 95 percent white, so I don't think we should incorporate it in America when niggers would just use all the money for welfare.

>>38595594
>>only get 9 million
>> unfair

File: Disgust.png (581KB, 504x481px) Image search: [Google]

581KB, 504x481px

>>38595628
Objectively the most disgusting "human" here

File: Capture.png (129KB, 1366x632px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1366x632px

>>38593029
>anything but an anarchic-republic
>ishygddt

File: Screenshot_150.png (29KB, 1275x694px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1275x694px

i'll hunt you down commiebois

>>38595510
>Why do I have to pay for a imbecile to hurt himself when I'm in perfect health?
So when you're not in perfect health, which you won't be at some point in your life, because EVERYONE gets sick eventually, that imbecile will be the one paying for your healthcare. Maybe not to the same degree, but nobody avoids the tax man without barely having any money to feed themselves.

It's the basic ideal behind insurance in the first place. A Single-Payer system makes this risk pool encompass an entire nation. The only counter-argument to this reasoning is
>muh guberment bureaucracy!
Insurance companies and corporations are greatly bureaucratic as well, so get that scaremongering out of here.

>>38595667
He pays the same tax rate as the common man and has worked hard to get where he is. It's intrinsic that he gets the same tax rate as everyone else. Let's look at a society like you're talking about where someone gets the same amount of money no matter where they work. The Soviet Union. Bakers had to charge the same price for everything and workers got paid the same no matter what.
People slacked off and shafted their customers and their bosses because they knew no matter what they still get the same cash flow. Meritocracy awards the hardest and smartest worker, therefore people have more drive to be on top, causing more efficiency and more quality labor. If I have the skills to achieve the top why should I have my nose stuck into my own shit then my head stomped? That's unfair.

>>38595628
It could also work in a society where race has become a non-issue, something with as much consequence as what a person is wearing that day.
Just something to consider.

>>38595823
It also damages the economy, as well as monopolizes the insurance industry. The state can now charge whatever the Hell they want just like a business that has monopolized the market. Also
>That imbecile will be paying for my healthcare.
He's not wealthy so he isn't taxed, and why when I can pay for myself with my own earned money.
>>38595925
He's probably a /pol/tard so your words fall on deaf ears.

File: Screenshot_2017-06-17-10-03-24.png (179KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1440x2560px

>>38595806
You fucking worthless commie

>>38595925
Race will always be an issue because race is real. Due to low average iqs, blacks and browns lack what it takes to do important jobs, creating less income for themselves, thus they need to drain out all the welfare. They hold us back and it will always be an issue because the racial intelligence difference is scientific fact. We can't be truly progressive as long as kangx and spics continue to hold us back.

>>38596042
>Low average IQs.
He fell for the jawline meme.

>>38595952
Not a /pol/tard. Far from it, I hate most conservative values. Only thing me and them agree on is race realism.

>>38596062
If by "fell for it" you mean accept it as the scientific fact it is, then yes

>>38596072
>>38596096
>Race realism
What realism? The difference between race is nothing in terms of mental ability. Racism is an emotional response learnt from prehistoric times and from closed mindedness. It is a plague on society and using one or two outdated studies from the thirties that have been BTFO'd by the scientific community time and time again is not "scientific fact"

File: 22e6ed88-0380-4252-8608-1d978d41800a.png (932KB, 909x1600px) Image search: [Google]

932KB, 909x1600px

>>38593029
I was 1x1y from dead center last time I took it.

Former poltard who started studying more than Nazi history here. Centrist is pretty much my natural state desu

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>38593029
A man should be able to own his nukes.

File: 8values.jpg (153KB, 1335x913px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1335x913px

>>38593029
Politics are a meme anyway

>>38596194
Race realism is fact. Study's have been done time and time again and they always come out with the same results, there was also a study out of Minnesota that debunked the claim that low black iqs are the result of poverty. I don't know what scientists your referring to, but the reality is that the majority of them accept it as fact.

>>38596346
Low black IQ is a meme you dumbass. Have you ever met the average black person without shitting on them like the white trash klansman you are?

>>38596194
Here's the wiki of the Minnesota study I was referring to. It was done in 1976, but it still stands true. Saying it's old isn't an argument.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study

>>38596416
>1976
Argument discarded. New studies have proven otherwise and this is a biased study.

>>38596411
Sorry but just because a fact makes you uncomfortable doesn't mean it's not real. And yes I've met many blacks, many of which were very smart, and I have zero hatred for them at all. I said their average iq is low. Keyword AVERAGE. I would never take an average iq and apply to an individual. The rule is general, not universal. I have more respect for smart blacks than I do stupid whites.

File: 1495730488170.png (23KB, 694x578px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 694x578px

Unironic stirnirite egoist.

I used to be ancap, so I still have sympathies to the lower-right, but better dead than spooked.

>>38596441
No, there haven't been any new studies that debunk this. If there was you would link them, but you can't because they don't exist. And you're an idiot for using the fact that the study is old as an argument. I guess we should also just reject Newtons laws because they came out soooooo long ago too, right?

>>38593029
purple square desu

>>38596505
I have done extensive research into this subject, the average IQ meme is incorrect. Plus even if it WAS correct, what makes it a warrant to treat people of African descent as less than others?

>>38593029
Lawful Apathy. Do things to numbers or be put to death because you're wasting my time. No one is allowed to waste my time but me.

File: Political Compass Results.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Constitutional conservative.

>>38596618
>I've done extensive research
So have i, butt unlike you I refer to study's and provide links.

And about me treating people differently, did you even read my post? I specifically said that I wouldn't use the average to judge someone as an individual. There are still many blacks and browns smarter than many whites and asians.

>>38595952
A State monopoly is a very different animal then a privately owned monopoly. A monopoly owned by an individual is under no obligation to give a hoot about if his customers quality of life besides if they can keep buying said product.
A State doesn't have that luxury, and any State that doesn't care needs to be overthrown anyway, and is probably on it's way to being ousted.

>>38596042
A person's IQ is flexible, and changes over the course of their life. Intelligence, like any other skill, can be improved, and is therefore not pre-determined by genetics, unlike a person's health. That black people have low IQ scores is a sign that something must be done to remedy that, not that we should shrug and leave them to their ghettos.

>>38596772
Sorry but that's factually incorrect, studys show that even rich blacks score around the normal black average, maybe 2 or 3 points higher but that's not saying much. And rich black kids do worse on the SAT than poor whites. Iq usually peaks in your early 20s and mostly has to do with genetics.

File: satracialgapfigure.gif (29KB, 276x315px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 276x315px

>>38596894
Here's the SAT proof btw

>>38594455
what's the right one
link me to the right one

File: vg Crash Bandicoot Woah.webm (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>38594905
because social detritus clings to tradition as a crutch to prop up their failing lives,
and gives them something ("progressivism") to rail against as the external cause for their failure:
it's not actually just their failure,
it's society failing and they're being dragged down with it. Just take a look at how and who ISIS recruits.

>>38595779
where's this from I wanna take it

File: Screenshot_20170721-151237.png (298KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1080x1920px

This is an unoriginal sentence whoever wrote this should themselves

File: file.png (100KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 800x600px

>>38597866
No, THIS is an unoriginal sentence. YOU should off yourself, dammit.