If being gay is caused by genetics, is it not a defect? A gene

What the fuck are you talking about OP? That's some psuedo science shit

>>38517500
I guess you could call it a defect. But then lots of other things, like dyslexia is also a defect.

File: AlanCarr-582615.jpg (27KB, 590x350px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 590x350px

>>38517500

OP, Gays are just people who've have such an influx of the opposite genders hormone during the early stages of development.

Yes that's genetics but that also means environmental factors as well.

>>38517519
>That's some psuedo science shit

meh, not really

>>38517500
I'm bi and consider it defect, although it's not too bad due to sperm donation. On the scale I'd rank them

actually retarded/major deformities >>>>>>>> being dumb > being short >>>>being gay >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>being bi (barely even matters)

It must be a defense mechanism, since gays are all mentally ill. Maybe it's a way for nature to prevent mentally ill people from breeding.

>>38517500

SHUT THE FUCK UP JARED

>>38517500
Of course it is (although more likely epigenetic than purely genetic)... It doesn't actually hurt anybody directly or compromise quality of life, so whatever.
Plus, if people say I'm defective because I'm gay, I'd tell them their priorities are really in the wrong places.

>>38517798
If it's a defect then why is it so celebrated?

It's quite annoying to see pride bollocks in my city every week full of disgusting fags

>>38517798

There's nothing with calling someone out on their mental illness.

its not a gene. their hypothalamus is half shorter.

>>38517500
Twins have strong correlation with sexual preference, which implies homosexuality is likely genetic.

>>38517805
even down syndrome is celebrated by the church, you cannot abort defected child, even if they will have a shitty life

File: 1480099389596.jpg (282KB, 520x770px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 520x770px

>>38517500
>his main biological goal
>falling for the "biological imperative" meme
>current year

users should be in control of the program, not the other way around :^)

>>38517500

Evolution works on group level too. I remember seeing a study that showed women with gay children being more fertile. Maybe having few kids that stay around helping instead of reproducing is beneficial if your strategy is to pop as many kids as possible. And its way too common across all species to be just some genetic fuck up.

>>38518694
>he thinks he's above his instincts

sure pal

>>38517548
Nigga, fucking dyslexia is a defect.

>>38517590
If only they'd shut the fuck up now.

>>38517500
spot on
>>38517548
of course dyslexia is a fucking defect no qualms whatsoever

>>38519217
Well obviously
If I choose not to have kids, which many people do nowadays, I'm above my 'instincts'

>>38517590
There's more straight mentally ill people than there are gay people tho

>>38519359
No, you just don't have a fucking choice in the matter.

>"I'm not gonna have kids"

Is just another way of saying

>"I'm NEVER gonna have kids"

Because you're ugly and degenerate.

>>38519359
yet you still get hard when you look at hot women

>>38519381
???
the % of straight ppl who are mental (25% if stretching definition) vs % of mental fags (100%; inherently defective since they're gay) is way out of proportion
your point means essentially nothing

>>38517500
Defects are subjective. Think about the first organism to exist, its goal wasn't to reproduce, that's just something it did. Life has no inherent meaning, we just do things.

>>38517500
Yeah but it's not as if it would end the species if it was a massive defect in humans, you don't need to be attracted to a woman to get her pregnant.

>>38519508
if orgasms didn't have an evolutionary purpose they wouldn't have spread so far genetically
in fact their purpose, if it wasn't clear enough, was to max sex feel gud so humans had more and thus more offspring, making humanity as a species more likely to survive
basic shit