when he Writes Like A Pussy

>>38510431
>>rather
>>relatively
>>presumably
>>seem

Yup. In my defense, I work in law, where those terms have value.

He was presumably a rather something somewhat of a person. Relatively speaking however, he seemed sort of the person I'd nearly fall in love with.

File: 1413169173651.png (449KB, 610x482px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 610x482px

>>38510530
stop it

what does this even mean

File: IMG_2609.jpg (180KB, 1000x658px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1000x658px

>>38510431
Wut r u originally trying to say amigo?

>>38510468
He says that in every sentence. Hold accountability for your words. Obnoxiously vague

Like how much of a pussy are you? You don't know how to qualify your statement?

>>38510572
it means we're getting nowhere and you're saying nothing

>>38510431

>>38510431
Hmm I somewhat agree with your point. Rather than using these relatively poor words we should using some not nearly as unclear. Presumably it would be words that are more clear cut in that sort of style, or so it would seem.

>>38511888
Using words like "presumably" is being accountable. You are stating that what follows comes from preset conditions rather than getting bogged down on the ins and outs of your knowledge. "Relatively" is actually being more precise as well as there is a difference between stating absolute and relative comparisons.

I only started writing like that because people online would get so booty-blased and say I was acting like my opinion was fact. It would derail threads on the professional wrestling forums I went on.

File: 5095b44915a25eb8ba2a17718fc863d9c0cfb128_hq.gif (266KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 500x281px

>>38510431
>hasn't figured out how to use pompous ambiguity to turn absolutely nothing into 10 pages
College is going to chew you up and spit you out.

>>38510431
I used to use the word honestly way too much, so I see how annoying it can get for someone to try and preface everything they say like that. But hopefully you don't think it's fucked to use these words sparingly, like they can and should be.
>>38512215
Kek, this too.

>>38512206
Imagine trying to get to know someone and they hedge for every clause they use. It's mind numbing, annoying, and makes me throw up.

I have no idea where you stand on anything.

>>38512264
Edit: It makes the speaker seem mindless*

lmao

>>38511888
>not inserting plausible deniability into everything you say
You probably ain't gonna make it in these times, friendo.

>>38512264
>I have no idea where you stand on anything.
>actually having definitive beliefs when you're not omniscient
lmao fag

>>38510431
This is somewhat true

>>38512341
Pretty sure the reader is aware of it without your insertion ;)

>>38512282
>prefacing things you say with disclaimers makes you seem mindless
>speaking in absolutes without obvious consideration that you could be wrong makes you seem mindless
it seems you can't win

File: 1.jpg (637KB, 1500x1010px) Image search: [Google]

637KB, 1500x1010px

>>38512406
I'm not just talking about disclaimers. There are people who unironically use these words in every sentence --- even if the topic is hot dogs or french fries. They are legitimately autistic.

>>38510431
You'd presumably think I'm a cuck relatively to my vocabulary? That seems somewhat wrong to be quite honest. It sort of seems that way, rather I don't believe I am nearly as cucked.

File: 2.jpg (371KB, 1500x997px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 1500x997px

So kill yourselves, socially inept soggy tools

>>38512441
>>38512449
Wow. A picture with an argument. It seems I will have to change my nearly all of my writing style now due to this.

Damn, feels good to be missed so much that someone starts analyzing your writing.

>>38512490
If you write like >>38510530 >>38511979
, you need to die a painful death.

"The food was relatively edible."

>>38512510
Presumably something we'll all achieve sooner or later, it is nearly a certainty. Too bad with your relatively blunt sort of thinking you do not seem to notice that. ;^)

>>38510431
Rather, relatively, and presumably are fine. About the others, you are correct.

t. professional writer

>>38512610
Presumably wasn't used that often. More words than listed there.

>>38512634
Relatively is not, when used in excess.

Op says presumably is fine but don't use that one word as if other autists are simply picking that one. There are a ton of wishy washy vague shitty words people like to use (not presumably) and it makes them seem mentally stunted.

File: 9utgk.gif (1MB, 158x129px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 158x129px

>>38510431
this is numale bait

t. numale

kek

>>38510431
not all of us write in ebonics like you

>>38512708
said the brony fanfic enthusiast

>Rereading chatlogs of e-bfs you decided to hate and pick apart their words
>Post rant complaining about THEIR autism and "social sogginess"

Seems legit yo.

>>38510431
>hurrr look at these words that make you a faggot
>HUR HUR HUR HUR HUR WHAT A PUSSY HURRRRRRRRRRRR

Shitposting is an art not a toy OP.

File: 1496261979317.png (2KB, 163x209px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 163x209px

>>38510431
>somewhat
essay padding
>rather
essay padding
>relatively
descriptive therefore useful
>presumably
useful
>sort of
useful if you want to say things are a similar in the immediate, narrow context
>seem
just a description of how things appear to the writer

>>38512731
what the fuck is an e-bf? i don't have any chatlogs of anyone i dislike either.

>>38510431
If you use qualifiers you're never fully wrong.
Thats alpha as fuck.

Not sure what's worse, girls keeping guys on "maybes" like

Boy: Do you want to be my prom date?
Girl: Mm.. maybe?? :// idk ? ? ? ? meb we'll see

Chad: "You're beautiful."

Dumb wimpiette: "You spark a relative attraction." ?????

Then how should I express mild indifference?

>>38512869
Get a life you fucking creep

You can express mild indifference but you don't have to disclaimer every clause you say

You are dumb as shit

>>38510431

>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>NOW
>SOON
>YOU FUCKING BOB
>LOSERS WEEPERS HAHAHAHA
>BLYAT
>*yelling*

>>38512812
It also does dispel anecdotal evidence the other person pulls out of their sleeve in advance.
After all, you have already acknowledged there are some exceptions to what you say beforehand.
I find it foolish to be absolute about anything but proven facts and your own decisions.