What do?

>>38465871
kick the knight

>>38465884
Exchange knight on e4 so you will make space for bishop on c6, black bishop is weak as shit, it would be goo to echange him for white black bishop on f6

but desu I would play
1. Kd5 then d5 and after that f5

https://lichess.org/jUABj4KR
lets go nerds

>>38465964
i meant advance the e pawn to kick whites knight away

>>38465964
or more like this
1. Kd4 Bd4
2. e5 Bb2
3. Bf6 if Be4 then Kf4 and f5 later if he plays Ke4 then d5 and after Kf6 Bf6 and e4 later

>/r9k/
figures that robots are brainlets

>>38465871
I have literally never won a game of chess, being a brainlet fucking sucks

>>38466055
you have to autistic enough to read books about it to get any good

>>38465871

White has like 50 nukes pointed at D4 you need to reinforce there.
he's about to get into your back rank with his queen and absolutely wreck you.

challenge his queen with pawn to e4, then trade knights, then attack his other knigth wirth ur dark bishop

>>38466029
Nigga, you need punctuation. I don't understand the logic of the last line there. There's a reason math and logic use parentheses. Also, how the fuck am I supposed to get my bishop onto f6?

>>38465964
>>38465990
An exchange of dark-squared bishops on f6 might open me up, though - yeah?

>>38465871
Knight E4 looks tempting. You fork Queen and Bishop. Exchanging knight for the D3 Bishop will win you the bishop pair and leave white with an isolated pawn down the middle

There could be much better moves though

>tfw too lazy to look up and learn how to play chess

>>38466127
Pointed at d4? What?

Pawn to e4? What?

>>38466033
Who's a brainlet?

>>38466055
Nah, don't say that. Being good at chess need not imply other kinds of intelligence anyway - nor does overall intelligence require that one be good at chess. I think.

>>38466176
I can learn a little this way too, surely. Situationally. Presumably, there are some good chess players on this board who can help me think through this. Fuck off.

>>38466153
1. lel Nd4
2. Bd4 Bc6
3. Ne4 e5
4. Bb2 d5
5 Nf6 Bf6

Ne4 and take his bishop
after that, watch out for Nc5

>>38465871

You should never begin a plan with hoping that your opponent falls into a trap. In fact: 1 ... e5 then 2. Ndf5 is pretty ugly for black.

I'd consider either the exchange of knights followed by e5, or maybe Ne5 alone is even better? Note that your c knight currently prevents Ndf5 (otherwise exf5 Rxf7 but your knight currently defends the bishop).

Rfe8 is also pretty solid. I'd like to think about g6, to stifle white's knight and light bishop, but it makes you too weak on the dark squares. Your a rook is tied to the defence of a6, meaning that it cannot occupy the c-file (not that your chances there are exemplary since c4 is always likely; but, it's better than being stuck.

Nd4 might be a nice eventual outpost for your f knight. If c4, then you could think about moving it to b4.

Despite white's space and slightly more active pieces, black's position is more coherent. I don't see an immediate threat to your queen. Thus, you should slowly improve your position, get your bishops into the game, trade for any of white's more active pieces.

come at me brainlets

https://lichess.org/5hUnxyth

chess threads are top comfy
https://lichess.org/9AshvMwZ

File: chess1.png (36KB, 553x560px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 553x560px

nyt2eefyv

>>38466776

Rfe8 is a potential prophylactic move to defend the bishop on e7, since white's Ndf5 is a potential tactical shot (black trades on d4). It's alo a waiting move.

File: chess2.png (51KB, 844x548px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 844x548px

>>38466885
Yeah, I gathered that much about Rfe8 and I can still do it. But now I'm thinking of Nxd3.

Also, thanks for teaching me a new word.

https://lichess.org/SrelGfBO

Only newfags allowed.

File: 1462500579941.png (96KB, 671x570px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 671x570px

>>38466969
>1783 rated newfag

>>38467009
I never even played on this website.

>>38466969
>white's pawn structure in shambles
its ogre

>>38465871
How does anyone play correspondence games?

My attention span is pretty good, but it doesn't last for weeks.

And what's to stop you from putting the position into a computer and choosing a "computer-ish" move?

File: sdfgh.jpg (56KB, 551x406px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 551x406px

>>38467051
I actually did it originally.

>>38466969
>>38467051
i stand corrected
>>38467235
nothin, just like nothing stops you from building a script that uses a chess engine to play online for you
People who play chess generally do it for the challenge or enjoyment of the game

https://lichess.org/4J7hYisK

>>38467257
you played well mr anon
black is a brainlet

>>38467257
good fork desu
white blundered bretty hard

File: 1391487493931.jpg (54KB, 500x600px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x600px

>>38467282

>tfw I didn't see the pin

>>38467320
its alright anon you where playing well up to that

>>38466928

Nxd3 looks good to me. He'll retake with queen. Rfe8 covers the tactical shot.

After that, I don't know. I'd love to play g6, but it makes you so weak on those dark squares. But white's knight on d4 is so strong and g6 would stifle it nicely. If you followed it up with e5, then it would block the diagonal nicely.

I don't know. This position actually feels quite sharp when I was working through some variations, mostly centered on white sacrificing his knight to open that e file. You need to squeeze the life out of it and carry that extra pawn into an endgame.

Nxd3 Qxd3
Rfe8 then maybe c4 (or Rad1 or Rac1)
g6 Nf3
e5

That looks good, but I may have overlooked something. Your d pawn could end up potentially weak, particularly if white piled on pressure with Ba3. To that end, you'll want to improve your light square bishop allowing Rd8 if necessary to defend the pawn.

Maybe you could think about b5 to force things open at a later date.

I'm going to bed, but I hope it goes well. Chess threads are comfy.

>>38467522
Good night. May you have wonderful dreams.