Have you ever realized how different beta males are from the alpha ones?
You see, beta males:
>They act differently
>Think different
>React differently that an alpha given the same social stimulus
>Has a different posture, and completely other body language
>They see women on a pedestal and tend to idolize them
>They are weeping and weak, full of feminine attributes
>Does not have the imposition that an alpha has
I used to think that the betas were a man who failed to be a man, either because of excessive mother protection, lack of experience or simply social inability, but lately I see that betas are so far apart from alphas that they are practically a third genre.
What /r9k/ think about this theory?
>Betas a different from alphas because they act different.
Who would have thought
BUMP
A thread like this need this kind of reference
>>38416377
a cool dude will see a dude hang hanging alone without a care in the world at a concert and go "that dude doesn't give a fuck, fucking sweet"
a beta will go "hah wat a loser"
>>38416782
head banging *
lmao hang hanging.
You ever notice how different people on /r9k/ and intelligent people are?
You see, /r9k/ posters:
> They act differently
> Think more slowly
> Refuse to change their mind when given new data
> See women as adversaries
> Are weeping and weak, full of insecurities they project onto others and overcompensate for
> lack critical thinking skills that intelligent people have
> buy into alpha/beta/omega classifications for human beings when there's no scientific basis for, or rigorous definitions of these classifications
I used to think /r9k/ posters were people who were failed by the educational system, people who would have developed critical thinking skills if given enough tutoring and personal attention, or if maybe they had a role model who inspired their sense of curiosity, but I'm starting to see that you're all so different... you're practically a third species.
What does /r9k/ think about this theory?
>>38417577
Really made me think
ORIGALIN