ITT: films only normalfags can understand
>>38331949
Are you implying it follows is too complex for robots to understand?
>>38331968
I think he's implying that it's a stupid movie only faggot normies would like
>>38331968
>oh these people are having sex and I can sympathize with that
>teehee i hope chad calls me soon
>so le sppoooky xD
>>38332063
I think OP said understand when he meant relate since robots can't relate to having sex and that's how you get followed in the movie