Thread replies: 133
Thread images: 41
Thread images: 41
Anonymous
Why should women have the same rights as men? 2017-07-09 09:12:09 Post No. 38260107
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Why should women have the same rights as men? 2017-07-09 09:12:09 Post No. 38260107
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 6029224+_b1f228e9b1ac256ca065db2dd829a65e.jpg (30KB, 348x342px) Image search:
[Google]
30KB, 348x342px
Why should women have the same rights as men?
Anonymous
2017-07-09 09:12:09
Post No. 38260107
[Report]
I mean, seriously, they're inferior in every way and their only worth is in their holes and wombs, both of which are in critical danger of becoming redundant.
>slower than men
>weaker than men
>less resilient than men
>stupider than men
>less prone to taking risks for high reward for men
>incapable of contributing anything meaningful to art, science, or technology
>incapable of thinking for themselves and follow the crowd like sheep
>incapable of holding loyalty for anyone, even family
>incapable of loving anyone aside from their own children, and even then not always
>hilariously incapable of basic pathfinding, leading to them getting lost frequently
>selfish and cowardly, making them incapable of defending anyone, even their own children
>ruled by their emotions and incapable of using logic or thinking rationally
>no concept of consequence, making them impulsive
Frankly, they barely even qualify as human, so why treat them as such? They should have the legal rights of children and need a male caretaker at all times to ensure they don't fuck up everything or hurt themselves with their impressively inferior capabilities.
>>
Women are people too, don't subjugate other people for things they didn't choose.
>>
File: 2AsvRcs.jpg (37KB, 809x273px) Image search:
[Google]
37KB, 809x273px
>>38260107
>slower than men
Compare women's Olympic speeds to those of 14 year old boys, and the boys win in every case even with the Olympic women doping.
>>
I mean, seriously, they're inferior in every way and their only worth is nothing.
>slower than people
>weaker than people
>less resilient than people
>stupider than people
>less prone to taking risks for high reward for people
>incapable of contributing anything meaningful to art, science, or technology
>incapable of thinking for themselves and follow the crowd like sheep
>incapable of holding loyalty for anyone, even family
>incapable of loving anyone
>hilariously incapable of basic pathfinding, leading to them getting lost frequently
>selfish and cowardly, making them incapable of defending anyone
>ruled by their emotions and incapable of using logic or thinking rationally
>no concept of consequence, making them impulsive
Frankly, they barely even qualify as human, so why treat them as such? They should have the legal rights of children and need a caretaker at all times to ensure they don't fuck up everything or hurt themselves with their impressively inferior capabilities.
>>
File: 4ycf4wxe6c0z.png (107KB, 767x548px) Image search:
[Google]
107KB, 767x548px
>>38260107
>weaker than men
Compare female "strongman" records to men and the men BTFO of women in every way possible. Even a high school athlete BTFO out of a profession female "athlete".
>>38260152
I didn't say they weren't people, I said they are not equal to men and should not be treated as such. At best they are overgrown children. At worst, they are parasites.
>>
File: 8iziw62j0fsy.png (358KB, 377x731px) Image search:
[Google]
358KB, 377x731px
Reminder to ignore all white knight and roastie posts. They just want (You)s.
>>38260107
>less resilient than men
Women are incapable of passing even Army basic training without seriously relaxed standards because they can't handle the stress. During crises and disasters, women become instant burdens and always seek men to save them, rather than saving themselves.
>>
>>38260199
>I didn't say they weren't people.
>At worst they are parasites.
>They barely even qualify as human.
Anon, don't dehumanise people. That leads to terrible things.
>>
File: 1471463364448.jpg (862KB, 1728x2412px) Image search:
[Google]
862KB, 1728x2412px
>>38260107
>stupider than men
Women's IQ is lower than men's, and female geniuses are virtually unheard of due to them lacking a Y chromosome. While stupider men are more common, the much, much higher number of extra intelligent men makes women's intellectual contributions minimal.
>>
File: 1472573707562.jpg (499KB, 1155x811px) Image search:
[Google]
499KB, 1155x811px
>>38260107
>less prone to taking risks for high reward for men
Obvious in the lack of women in all high level positions and the few number of women starting businesses. Women balk at risk for reward, and as such virtually never accomplish success or high level positions unless artificially forced there by law.
>>
File: 1476038233834.jpg (43KB, 303x341px) Image search:
[Google]
43KB, 303x341px
>>38260107
>incapable of contributing anything meaningful to art, science, or technology
Aside from approximately a dozen female geniuses (contrasted to millions of male geniuses) that have made minor contributions to science, women do virtually nothing of import in art, science, or technology. Even after sixty plus years of trying to force women to succeed in all three avenues, women still can not do anything other than basic research positions and subpar coding. They're objectively incapable of succeeding in meaningful pursuits.
>>38260229
Objectively speaking of their inferior capabilities may dehumanize them, but that's not my intent. Children are parasites too, but that doesn't mean they aren't people.
>>
>>38260248
I have this image saved already and the archived cgl thread doesn't work.
>>
File: 1480737028098.jpg (179KB, 1321x249px) Image search:
[Google]
179KB, 1321x249px
>>38260107
>incapable of thinking for themselves and follow the crowd like sheep
Not only do women exhibit same group preference to a disturbing degree, but women are highly suscepitble to peer pressure and popular opinion. This is why almost all advertisement is directed at women, and why fads are almost always most popular with women. They're sheep, and very rarely can one think for themselves or make their own opinions.
>>
File: 1482263203808.jpg (1MB, 1308x1828px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1308x1828px
>>38260107
>incapable of holding loyalty for anyone, even family
This is easily seen in the fact that women are almost always the ones who initiate divorces or breakups, and by their willingness to abandon men and children in disaster scenarios to save themselves. To women, their lives come first always, making them incapable of holding loyalty.
>>
>>38260327
Why would you need the thread?
>>
File: 1483884903508.jpg (891KB, 1560x2744px) Image search:
[Google]
891KB, 1560x2744px
>>38260107
>incapable of loving anyone aside from their own children, and even then not always
Women don't love men, they love what men provide: food, shelter, money, status, protection, and other resources. Whereas men love women for the women themselves, men only love what men provide and WILL leave the man if he is ever incapable of providing those resources or a man with more resources propositions her. This is also why it's exceedingly common for a woman to leave a man whenever he is injured or ill, as that means he is not able to continue providing said resources.
Women are responsible for the lioness's share of child abuse and child murder, and responsible for almost all infant killings. Even when they have children, they often can't help but treat them terribly.
>>
File: C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_1499513830003.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search:
[Google]
17KB, 480x360px
>>38260190
Awww, is the roastie mad?
>>
Women should have the same rights as men because women, too, are human beings. (inb4 DIE ROASTIE)
>>
File: 1486476644572.jpg (117KB, 750x750px) Image search:
[Google]
117KB, 750x750px
>>38260107
>hilariously incapable of basic pathfinding, leading to them getting lost frequently
>https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/12/151207081824.htm
>"The men solved 50 per cent more of the tasks than the women"
>these were 3D mapping tests
>even when women were given testosterone to make them more like men, they still failed miserably in comparison to men and took substantially longer to succeed
>>
File: 1486478049474m.jpg (222KB, 775x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
222KB, 775x1024px
>>38260107
>selfish and cowardly, making them incapable of defending anyone, even their own children
Women will always put their lives ahead of any man's life, and will have no issue letting a man or several men die in their stead if it increases their chances of survival. This not only includes mates and family, but their older male children as well. To women, men are disposable utilities and all they value is their own skin if it comes down to you or her.
>>
>>38260464
I wanted to see their hamstering in action for myself.
>>
>>38260107
>ruled by their emotions and incapable of using logic or thinking rationally
The high levels of estrogen permanently change women's minds and make them less capable of thinking logically or rationally. They are motivated purely by emotions and instincts, and their sense of "want" will always override any logic they have. This is why women are typically terrible with finances, terrible with long term planning, bad at driving, terrible at debating, and terrible at leading. Although they are borderline sociopathic in their dealings with others, they are paradoxically ruled by other emotions such as avarice, lust, and wrath.
>>
File: 1486704245165.jpg (195KB, 780x927px) Image search:
[Google]
195KB, 780x927px
>>38260107
>no concept of consequence, making them impulsive
This ties in with women "thinking" with their emotions. Since they lack any concept of logic, they also lack the very basic logical pathway between cause and effect. They think nothing will ever happen to them for their actions, and since so many people in society coddle women more than children, this is reinforced through a frequent lack of concept of consequence. This is why women fuck around without regards for pregnancy, STDs, or destroying their ability to pair bond, and why they often do actions that any man would immediately be able to tell is a bad idea. This is also part of why female monarchs have always been far more prone to wars than their male peers, as they can't comprehend the consequence. The other part is that they don't view the men as people, but rather commodities, and are fine with wasting them frivolously if it ensures her comfort.
>>
File: 1486750792925.jpg (1MB, 1698x2490px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1698x2490px
So, in light of all of these inferior qualities of women that make them as children but worse, why do we pretend they need the same rights as men? They are incapable of acting and behaving as men, which is necessary to hold the responsibility that is tied to the rights men have, so why do we pretend otherwise? If any roasties or white knights have actual arguments to share and not "wah think of the holes" then I'd like to hear them.
>>38260487
Ignore the roasties and white knights. They only want (You)s, so don't give them the attention. They have no interest in debate.
>>
It's funny that this shit always come from the lowest tier of men, who are way worse at life than the average woman.
>>
File: 1487377942921.jpg (1MB, 3596x2102px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 3596x2102px
>>38260504
That's not an argument, it's an appeal to emotion. Children should have the right to vote, drive, and fuck as they wish because they too are humans, but we realize they are incapable of handling the responsibility so they are denied it. Women too are incapable of handling the responsibility with rights.
>>
File: 1488720578406.jpg (49KB, 960x444px) Image search:
[Google]
49KB, 960x444px
>38260668
Not even worth a (You), my toasted roast.
>>
Women should not be considered the same as men, and it is harmful to them to do so.
They should occupy their natural role in society, where they can be loved and protected.
>>
>>38260668
Yeah, seriously. Women are apparently ruled by their emotions yet all these dudes spend probably 10+ hours a day raging and whining on this board about how they can't get their dick wet and how they are so lonely. Meanwhile they do nothing to improve their lives and blame their circumstances on the apparently-almighty SJWs (who no one but the SJWs take seriously, btw)...
>>
File: 1488969634325.jpg (102KB, 1261x221px) Image search:
[Google]
102KB, 1261x221px
>>38260715
How do we convince the white knights and women of this fact? Despite the mountains of evidence and millenia of historical examples showing how terrible it is for everyone when we pretend women have the capabilities of men, they remain unconvinced. Is the power of pussy worship truly that powerful? I feel as though it will be the death of mankind.
>>
File: 1488970136437.jpg (151KB, 1148x462px) Image search:
[Google]
151KB, 1148x462px
>38260731
>nobody takes the SJWs seriously
Except the rulers of every western country, my toastie hole.
>>
>>38260752
How about Norah Vincent as an example? She recognized women have more privilege than men. Women wouldn't last a lifetime in our shoes. https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ip7kP_dd6LU
>>
>>38260686
lol
and yet, this apparently incapable gender controls reproduction. If you want women to give birth to your children, she's going to want something in return - equal rights, maybe. A woman without equal rights will be subject to manipulation and violence from men and will hardly be in a position to be a well-adapted, healthy, happy mother. Women are not completely retarded and therefore will be displeased with being subjected as the 'lesser sex' because women know that isn't rational. Why do you want to keep the future mother of your children down? Why wouldn't you want her, and potentially your daughter (s), to enjoy the same rights and privileges as you and your sons? I don't get it.
>>
File: 1488978802754.jpg (295KB, 2280x1140px) Image search:
[Google]
295KB, 2280x1140px
In addition to the numerous shortcomings laid out in the OP, women are also incapable of basic morals, such as integrity, honor, and pride. This is a huge reason why women do not enjoy war and action movies, or learning about history, as both are heavily centered around these human traits that women are unable to comprehend. It is much like an ant trying to understand why humans like tasty food when the ant doesn't have a tongue with which to taste. It only understand nutrition, just as women only understand their own comfort and survival.
>>
>>38260686
There are woman that can handle it just fine and men that can't handle it at all.
The only way to be objective on that point would be to have a test or a checklist and not basing it on just the generalised half of the population.
>>
File: 1488979290540.png (34KB, 798x308px) Image search:
[Google]
34KB, 798x308px
>>38260812
I tried to make clear in my comments that while I seemed to be speaking in absolutes, there are doubtless the very rare woman who is the exception to the near absolute rule either through exceptional effort to overcome their nature or through defect. This woman is one, as are the rare women like Karen Straughan who have pierced the veil of lies and gleaned some truth on the state of the world. However, despite them having some intellectual capacity, they would still argue voraciously in favor of women having the same rights as men, and will never admit that women having the same rights as men is damaging for society as well as both women and men.
Despite their exceptional qualities, they are part of the problem and support the current damaging paradigm and myths of female equality. The only woman I have seen to be an exception is Ann Coulter, who I personally dislike and thinks looks like a man, but realize that women should not have the right to vote. Paradoxically, she also wields political and social influence and works, which goes against her own beliefs.
>>
File: 1488985485203.jpg (74KB, 800x600px) Image search:
[Google]
74KB, 800x600px
>>38260819
If you can't defend your argument then I will ignore your posts. Stop moving the goalpost and using red herrings to distract from your inability to use logic.
>A woman without equal rights will be subject to manipulation and violence from men
That's not true at all. In America there have always been strong laws against beating or mistreating women, and even female slaves were exempted from the harsher punishments that male slaves would be subject to. There is no historical basis for your claim in the U.S.
>>
>>38260921
Do you read Esther Vilar as well? You sound like you'd enjoy it. I actually agree with you on your premise as well. Ann also touched upon the danger of single mothers as well.
>>
File: 1489036863128.png (35KB, 888x305px) Image search:
[Google]
35KB, 888x305px
>>38260866
The rare exception doesn't outweigh the damage of the supermajority. The odd female exception doesn't warrant destroying society out of some misguided sense of fairness or justice.
>>38260866
>The only way to be objective on that point would be to have a test or a checklist
I wouldn't be opposed to that. This would let the rare woman who has the strength, intelligence, endurance, and logic of a man to be treated as a man in society, along with all the costs and benefits that would bring. Very, very few women would qualify, but if it would satisfy the damaging insistence on "fairness" then I wouldn't be opposed to it.
>>
File: 1489049064797.jpg (428KB, 888x1552px) Image search:
[Google]
428KB, 888x1552px
>>38260990
Never heard of her, but I'll check her out, thanks. Yes, single mothers are a danger, but I personally view them as a symptom of the greater problem of women mistakenly being given the rights of men that they can not handle. I am more focused on the root cause that, once fixed, would fix a myriad of ills that plague our society.
>>
File: 1489356695964.jpg (208KB, 923x633px) Image search:
[Google]
208KB, 923x633px
Has /r9k/ completely fallen to the normalfags and roasties?
>>
>>38261022
So what happens to the men who'd fail this test in your opinion?
Also I wouldn't say physical strenght is necessary at all to be a responsible adult.
>>
>>38261344
>So what happens to the men who'd fail this test in your opinion?
Never said they'd be taking it.
It's not just strength, you're intentionally ignoring the point of my argument. It's a laundry list of shortcomings that make women unqualified to hold the responsibility their rights entail, not just them having the strength of 13 year old boys.
>>
Muslims have already figured this out OP, we just have to become more like them.
>>
I like having rights, it's not my fault you're better at manual labor.
>>
File: 1489368248250.png (95KB, 1543x770px) Image search:
[Google]
95KB, 1543x770px
>>38261738
Literally the only thing Muslims are right about is women. In all other facets of existence, they are wrong.
>>38261789
You "liking" having rights isn't an argument.
>>
>>38261804
There's a few other things I can agree with Muslims on, but yeah, you're pretty much right.
>>
>>38261804
It seems pretty good to me.
>>
>>38260107
You are delusional, anon. Please stop posting. Someone of no worth (You) has no right in saying what the worth of anyone else is. Go construct a better life for yourself and have something to truly be proud of and live for before you spout uninformed and ignorant words.
If you still feel the same way afterwards, fine, but your post is just laden with with biased and unfiltered malice over half of the human race with little logical reason and entirely too much "reasoning with your feelings" instead of analytical and factual thought.
>>
>>38261888
All his points are based on facts, fuck off dumb white knight
>>
>>38261682
Why attack woman if they fail to meet this standart but not men?
That's just plain sexism without reason.
I just singled out strenght because I don't think it's a requirement to be a responsible adult.
If you say logic and intelligence are required then I can see why.
>>
File: 1491750353849.jpg (126KB, 1309x313px) Image search:
[Google]
126KB, 1309x313px
>>38261885
Not an argument.
>>38261888
Not an argument.
The complete inability of roasties and white knights to refute any of my points just strengthens my convictions.
>>
>>38261925
>Why attack woman if they fail to meet this standart but not men
Because even a dumb and weak man doesn't meet most of the shortcomings a woman does, as I laid out in the OP. You're either really stupid or intentionally ignoring the laundry list of shortcomings women have compared to men so you can focus on a handful and push your narrative of "muh fairness". But sure, if you want to find the less than one percent of men who meet all of the qualities of a woman in the OP then I guess you can pointlessly test men to weed out that exceedingly small number.
>>
>>38262035
Robots meet all the shortcomings of women and more.
>>
>>38261915
>incapable of contributing anything meaningful to art, science, or technology
False.
>incapable of thinking for themselves and follow the crowd like sheep
Hilariously vague and can apply to men as well.
>incapable of holding loyalty for anyone, even family
Fallacy. This implies that 100% of women are cheaters and swindlers.
>ruled by their emotions and incapable of using logic or thinking rationally
Something which OP is showcasing for us right now on account of the lack of ANY research and studies presented as proof.
>no concept of consequence, making them impulsive
Again, hilariously vague and could apply to men. Aren't men jailed more than women? Wouldn't that mean that men think less about consequence?
Look, I get it, you're a bitter virgin who thinks vagina should be served to you on a silver platter for no other reason than because while Chad was working out, studying, actually socializing and living his life by taking risks and being outgoing, you were holing up indoors and would rather play video games and read comic books than try to build a good life for yourself. And now that it's too late, you're too far gone and so deep in hatred and despair, you convince yourself that "women must be awful, they're not worth it at all!" and you think this because you know you're a broken person, a failure.
Just get off of this board and never post again. Go live in your escapism media while you can.
>>
>38262053
Not an argument, in addition to being hilariously false.
>>
File: 1498657752469.gif (1MB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 500x500px
Virgins crack me up. Scientists should discover a way to convert pure butthurt into energy. This board would be near infinite in its wealth.
>>
File: 1491743545524.jpg (121KB, 520x588px) Image search:
[Google]
121KB, 520x588px
>>38262087
Simply stating things are wrong without any proof to back it up isn't an argument. Everything I said was based in fact, and I even expanded on each point and referenced evidence to support them. If you want to counter argue, then put some thought and effort into it.
Oh, who am I kidding, women aren't capable of the logic needed to actually have an intellectual debate, they just screech and whine and say you're wrong while bitching about unfairness.
>bitter virgin
Confirmed woman. When you realize you can't argue or support your claims, threaten the unavailability of holes.
>>
File: 1498235381610.jpg (83KB, 355x369px) Image search:
[Google]
83KB, 355x369px
>>38262097
Yeah, the bountiful advantages and pleasures of being a robot is why you're posting on here instead of actually getting laid, right? Surely your worst robot is better than the best woman.
>>
>>38262158
>Simply stating things are wrong without any proof to back it up isn't an argument.
That's what you do.
>Oh, who am I kidding, women aren't capable of the logic needed to actually have an intellectual debate
Probably not. Does that mean you're a woman?
>>
>>38260190
Make me your slave,I don't need rights I just need a woman who will care about me
>>
>38262177
Average man is still better than the strongest woman. https://youtu.be/MF-YeWnIJfU
>>
>>38262158
Lol look man, I'm not reading your pissy loser drivel. You've never had sex, nor will you because you fucked up so hard that you barred yourself from any future social standing. Sit there and put on your brave internet front all you want to show how macho you are for all your little robot friends, but as you're reading this, you know I'm 100% right. You won't admit it, because that would hurt too much, yet admitting it and fixing yourself is a very possible and real outcome for you, yet you are so ingrained into your spite, you disallow yourself from actually enjoying life and being happy. Good job playing yourself, I sincerely and genuinely hope that you get it all figured out someday.
>>
>>38262190
>That's what you do.
Aside from providing actual evidence like Olympic stats, referencing a well known IQ study, and the easily searchable washout rates of women in the military? Not to mention the easily verifiable facts of women putting their own safety first in disasters, killing and abusing children more, and initiating the vast majority of breakups and divorces? I provided an abundance of evidence, you provided none aside from a half assed "b-b-but men go to prison more". You have no argument, and you clearly are incapable of structuring one or providing explained or relevant counterexamples. Unless your small mind can manage that, this is the last (You) that you will get.
>>
>>38262253
>Good job playing yourself
Xd yeah you go girl! You get em!
>>
>>38260326
>left tit
>right tit
oriigiiigiiiinalllissimmooo
>>
>>38262253
>if you disagree with me you won't get any holes!
Is this the only way women know how to argue?
>>
>>38262318
No, they can also tell you that you're a virgin.
Aside from that, no, they have no other ways to argue.
>>
>>38262264
>Not to mention the easily verifiable facts of women putting their own safety first in disasters, killing and abusing children more, and initiating the vast majority of breakups and divorces?
None of which was actually sourced.
No fucking shit are women weaker on average, that's just fucking genetics. The IQ example should be thrown out the fucking window as well since women have been set back decades with the aftermath of not giving them an equal playing field still sorting itself out. Third generation attitudes about women still exist and it deeply roots itself into the society of nations that were not equal. Women still pursue lesser education and lower paying jobs due to antiquated social roles that have stuck around in the zeitgeist of how each sex should live.
>>
>>38262350
Calling you a virgin is tied in with that. Everything they use for """""arguing""""" is talking about sex and not having sex. It's so incredibly vapid and emotionally based, and does nothing but support the argument I have made, but they aren't even capable of comprehending that. It's almost embarassing.
>>
>>38262318
Not a woman, but yeah, it's very fucking clear you've never had a "hole" in your life. It's okay to say vagina, anon, I know it's an embarrassing word, but that's a quality you also present well.
>>38262279
I see you've given up - the only thing you can do.
>>
>38262352
You know those headlines on those stories? If you go on Google, with the name you get a source! You're welcome
>38262389
Yas bitch yas!
>>
>>38262373
>It's so incredibly vapid and emotionally based
Just like your massive rant that is CLEARLY an underlying bitchfest about how you've never gotten laid.
>>
File: 1496942751738.jpg (193KB, 421x536px) Image search:
[Google]
193KB, 421x536px
>>38262352
>None of which was actually sourced.
If you can't use google then I can't help you. Literaly google the exact phrases I wrote and you'll get your sources.
>>
>>38262422
Nice burden of proof, anime posting virgin.
>>
>if you disagree with me you won't get the all important SEX!!!!
Jesus fucking Christ, women are embarassing.
>>
>>38262421
Nice job proving our point once again by resorting the calling him a virgin "argument".
Every time you do that, you give us further evidence that we are correct.
>>
>>38260107
Because they're still above children.
>>
>>38262445
>if you don't give me sex, I won't agree with you!!
Jesus fucking Christ, men are embarrassing.
Also, learn to spell.
>>
You guys realize you're worse than women, right?
Most of you are inept NEETs with no future, you're not even good for procreation.
Does it feel good to brag about the achievements of other men while you sit in your mom's basement?
>>
>>38262474
Cool, so you can be """correct""" and never have had sex. You're the winner here, anon. Gonna get that one put on your grave that your lack of children won't be paying for?
What a fucking cuck.
>>
File: GrmyRGUr.jpg (266KB, 1456x1103px) Image search:
[Google]
266KB, 1456x1103px
>>38262445
Stop it you virgin! You're a virgin who'll magically love women after you get a whiff! Virgin virgin virgin!
>>
>>38262479
Please elaborate how that means they should have the rights and responsibilities of men.
>>
File: BpAh9dz.png (67KB, 228x228px) Image search:
[Google]
67KB, 228x228px
>angry nerds complain about women so hard that they get turned off and don't put out
>"w-what the fuck why won't you have s-sex with me?!?"
Loving
Every
Laugh
>>
>>38262445
Well its not like if you agree with them anything will change, you're either a Chad or you're not, they're trying to bribe you with nothing
>>
Don't worry about it OP. Once civilization collapses women will be put back in their place.
>>
>>38262533
It's funny how when roasties reeee about facts and logically sound arguments, literally all they can do is prove it right.
>>
>>38262606
>implying there's any women here
>implying there's any whiteknights here due to first implications
>implying you know it's futile but keep posting anyway
Seriously, anon, quit being an embarrassment and go play a video game or something. This is starting to genuinely get depressing and sad. Ranting on here changes nothing, just go DO something with your life.
>>
File: KHwv6OK.jpg (114KB, 768x696px) Image search:
[Google]
114KB, 768x696px
>>38262606
All they have to do is maybe sweeten the pot of sex and marriage and maybe some will come back. Also not be a raging cunt. It's too high a standard of parasites unfortunately.
>>
>>38262667
What you propose would require women to have intelligence, logic, and morals on par with men, which they do not. The obvious to us is incomprehensible for them.
>>
>>38262506
Yes it's called cuckoldry and most of us beta males here into that
>>
>>38262696
I'm sure you're just aces across the board, huh, champ? That's why you sit on /r9k/ and twiddle your dick all day instead of being in public, right? Due to your IQ of 130 and your olympian physique, right?
>>
>>38262696
Yeah it's truly a sad sight to see. We are quite literally telling them of ways to improve life for all but we're the bad guys.
>>
>>38262586
Not good enough, nor is it guaranteed. Ignoring problems in hopes they go away on their own does not work.
>>
File: 1498301729764.png (339KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
339KB, 1280x720px
What a sad pathetic thread. At first I was having fun messing with the virgin crowd, but now I actually feel bad for doing that and I apologize. I have nothing but sorrowful pity for you all. This isn't fun anymore. I hope something good happens to each of you today in exchange for my bantering. Genuine advice here though, cut the threads, guys. Endlessly posting about women is only going to churn more negative emotion in you and prevent you from taking enjoyment in your hobbies and lives. Keep your opinions and mindsets, that's fine, but please go do something enjoyable instead of this.
>>
>>38262818
The best way to convince us would be to structure a logical argument supported by counter evidence that addresses every point I made. Save the emotional appeal bullshit, that only work on women and trannies.
>>
File: 1490519217747.jpg (261KB, 608x2308px) Image search:
[Google]
261KB, 608x2308px
So, intelligent anons, what is the solution to the woman problem? How do we roll back the legislation pushed by white knights and women and fix the damage it has caused? This generation and the next seem like lost causes, but if we make substantial changes now we might be able to salvage them.
>>
>>38262982
The leftists pushing for women's rights also have a huge hard on for Islam, so we just have to convince them that treating women as property is progressive, and that they're Islamophobic if they don't agree.
>>
>>38262982
I have got just the screencap for that. Give me a second to find it.
>>
>>38262818
There's plenty of happiness and enjoyment to be found outside of placating women. Of course you'd argue the contrary, due to having a vested interest in men believing your bullshit.
>>
>>38260107
>incapable of contributing anything meaningful to art
But op I really enjoyed this book
It was cozy
>>
>>38262506
>Can't acquire Chad's looks
>Can only quote other people's arguments to prove said intelligence
>Meanwhile, even the ugliest roastie can get a decent future simply because she's a female
I can almost smell the rage of the failures in this thread. Don't bother, they're a lost cause.
>>
>>38263031
Sounds nice on the surface, but the only thing Muslims are right on is women. We don't need to destroy our society in a different way just to control women, that seems suicidal to me. But if we could convince them just about the parts with women then that isn't a bad idea. How would we do that?
>>38263038
Looking forward to it.
>>
>>38263044
Women and white knights always argue that the only path to happiness is to worship women and cater to their every want and need. One of their greatest fears is men realizing that not only can you find happiness and fulfillment outside of worshipping women, but that women are actually the most likely to steal your happiness and contentment in the long run. That's why the hate the truth being told, and try to quash all unwanted facts.
>>
>>38263084
The only I can think of getting it to actually work would be to take control of the mainstream media, and push propaganda to convince them. Most of them will believe anything the mainstream media tells them, so they would just need to slowly change their viewpoints with subtle propaganda.
>>
>>38260107
Women are monkeys
Very good at twisting reality
Look what happened to r9k and pol
Do you now realize why male only spaces were a thing?
>>
>>38263176
That would doubtless work, but infiltrating the feminist dominated media seems to be nigh impossible at this point. Not only do they blacklist anyone who tries to speak the truth from every working in it, but they censor all evidence that would support the truth. It fees like pissing into a hurricane to get in there.
>>
>>38263239
I've always known why male only spaces were a thing; it's the only way anything meaningful can be done or discussed. It's also why women have always fought against male only spaces and screeched about unfairness until those spaces were shut down or the women allowed in.
>>
>>38263265
It's actually quite simple. Kind of. All you need is enough money, but getting that money is the hard part.
All you would need to do is pay the right people the right amount of money to change what happens on the news, but it would be no small sum. If we had a billionaire on our side who understood the cause, it would be achievable, but otherwise it would be nearly impossible.
>>
>>38260107
>slower than men
usually yeah
>weaker than men
usually yeah
>less resilient than men
sometimes
>stupider than men
sometimes
>less prone to taking risks for high reward for men
if u say so
>incapable of contributing anything meaningful to art, science, or technology
untrue
>incapable of thinking for themselves and follow the crowd like sheep
untrue
>incapable of holding loyalty for anyone, even family
untrue
>incapable of loving anyone aside from their own children, and even then not always
untrue
>hilariously incapable of basic pathfinding, leading to them getting lost frequently
sometimes rofl
>selfish and cowardly, making them incapable of defending anyone, even their own children
false
>ruled by their emotions and incapable of using logic or thinking rationally
false
>no concept of consequence, making them impulsive
false
Most of these are circumstantial and change from person to person. I'm sure there are plenty of women stronger, faster, and more intelligent than 90% of this board.
tl;dr ur just a spiteful virgin
>>
>>38260152
Shut the fuck up. I bet youre also a failed cyborg that feels empathy in chad bashing threads
>>
>>38263325
So we'd need the support of a billionaire benefactor to make it happen. Is there any billionaire that's red pilled? The closest I can think of is Murdoch, but he doesn't seem to see the truth.
>>
>38263385
>not
>an
>argument
Also clearly didn't read the comments with evidence supporting each claim.
>virgin
Oh, it's just another angry woman who is incapable of thinking.
>>
rather than take rights away from women, we need to take away rights from niggers. that would be much more beneficial.
>>
>>38263077
Leave them be. It's their coping mechanism for being useless to society. They need to find something that'll make them feel better, so they delusionally affiliate with average men in attempts to seem superior to women.
>>
>>38263421
i'm a man, and I regularly talk to more women than you have in your entire life
stay in your basement
>>
>>38263516
Blacks are literally only a problem in America because of feminism. Back in the sixties before feminism destroyed their communities, almost every family had a father and crime was far lower than today. They worked, and needed very little government aid. You want to address a symptom instead of the cause.
>>
File: 1495941841431.png (47KB, 1544x532px) Image search:
[Google]
47KB, 1544x532px
>>38263084
Well this as close I could find it. It had something to do with no fault divorce. Fuck it was really good. Hopefully this will tide you over until I find the other one
>>
>>38260190
Aren't robots sort of ad hoc lower class citizens anyway?
>>
>>38263587
Feminism didn't destroy their communities. It might have contributed a bit, but other factors are far more responsible.
>>
>>38263397
I can't really think of any either. The only people I can think of that are guaranteed to share our views on women would be actual Muslim billionaires, but the only way to make that work would be to convince them that you're using the money to convert people to Islam by getting them more comfortable with Muslim ideas, and then quit once we've succeeded just convincing them about how women should be treated.
>>
>>38260152
>don't subjugate other people for things they didn't choose.
Why not? You can't just spout nonsense like this without an explanation.
>>
>>38263621
That was good, looking forward to the other one. Thanks for looking man, I appreciate it.
>>38263666
Crack and rap certainly didn't help, but I think feminism is what got the ball rolling and did the most damage.
>>
>>38263691
Yeah, and if we took muslim billionaire help we would just trade one devil for another. I'd rather not end up like the Middle East if I can help it.
Any other ideas?
>>
>>38260190
>implying i am treated as a human bean.
>>
>>38263053i really enjoyed that book as well anon.
>>
>>38263837
The only other ideas I can think of would be to get close with billionaires who already prefer for women to have tradition roles, gain their trust, and slowly convince them of how women ought to be treated. If successful, then the rest of the plan can be executed.
>>
File: 8vyqZjO.jpg (721KB, 1439x1494px) Image search:
[Google]
721KB, 1439x1494px
>>38263747
I finally found it. The is what I think should happen.
>>
>>38264171
Thanks m8, let me read it.
>>
>>38264171
I love it, it's a very good step for fixing things. And might not even necessitate removing women's right to vote, that's a fascinating stance.
>>
>>38264760
It's so easy it just might work. But how would we implement this when feminists have the majority in government?
>>
>>38260107
Because even though lots of woman are subhuman, there are a few human woman out there. For every 5 woman who are shitty wives and mothers there is one who is a good wife and mother. For every 10 woman who are retarded there is one non-retarded one.
Should we take away the rights of black people just because a lot of them act like monkeys?
>>
>>38265174
Therein lies the rub, doesn't it? However, with public sentiment turning against feminism more and more, we might be able to make a good case to the "traditional" side for revitalizing a traditional family.
>>
>>38265478
It truly frightens me that we let it get to this point in the first place. I would love for the traditional life for my children since I didn't get to experience it for myself. It's only a matter of time u suppose.
Thread posts: 133
Thread images: 41
Thread images: 41