README-MISINFORMATION

>>38032511
>this one shittily reasearched pic debunks everything else.
Well, check your sources regardless, lads, because that's exactly the argument the roasties and the reddit betas are going to use. Stick to the truth, no need to lie when your position is the one supported by reality.

>>38032511
I appreciate the effort, but you gotta where you are on the internet. Most of the stuff here is false, so don't get too worked up. Whenever I look into the "proofs" and links people here give for any issue, it is almost always a case of linking to some meme website which blatantly misinterprets/misquotes the source material. Either that, or linking to a funded "study" which has no standing, peer review and even has an admitted bias. Or posting an image which further misinterprets the findings of an already-debunked study from 40 years ago. Sometimes they just give up and post youtube rants as sources.

>>38032546
What are you saying?

>>this one shittily reasearched pic debunks everything else.

I never said that. Try reading my post again.

>Well, check your sources regardless, lads,

THAT'S WHAT I FUCKING SAID.

>>38032612
I know. Unfortunately a lot of people here don't.

>CNN DEBUNKS
nice try. She was heralded as the iconic image for decades. I'm sure a contender would have stepped in earlier, but this "Naomi Parker" nobody didn't.
And guess what, even if the drawing was based on no one, the fact is women doing manual labour don't want to do it and do it badly. Why? Because they expect riffraff jobs to be delegated to disposable males.
"We Can Do It!" is a perennial joke no matter whose face the clown telling it is.

>>38032511
>someone tells lies in the internet
Wow who would have thought!

File: 148948962871.png (172KB, 539x779px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 539x779px

>>38032511
>but I would like to point out that you shouldn't believe everything you read on 4chan.
this should go without saying but you need to understand where you are and why they are here.

>>38033728
>And guess what, even if the drawing was based on no one, the fact is women doing manual labour don't want to do it and do it badly
See, that's the problem- your stance that women are inherently/naturally unwilling and bad at manual labour, is not invalid. But if you decide to further your opinions by spreading fake/misleading images, it actually detracts from your stance. People think "wait, if this person can't even provide a valid source, and has fallen for this bs image without looking into it, is their stance really valid?"
>even if the drawing was based on no one
Even if you hold the "right" stance, it doesn't excuse spreading fake memes.

I NEED A GF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
oreganoo