Would you say this comic is accurate?

>>37905947
Last guy should be 6'1 and tower over him since he's 6 and 1/2

Their height in relation to the girls is the same???

>>37905947
Maybe, I don't know anyone to artificially lengthen themselves, but I would guess that yes, naturally some men will land girls no matter what.

File: ok_cupid.png (14KB, 480x353px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x353px

>>37905947
There's an undeniable trend that women find taller men more attractive than shorter men.

>>37905947
>I want to buy a helicopter
>you should
I need surgery to get my sides straightened.

File: IMG_2277.png (565KB, 600x610px) Image search: [Google]

565KB, 600x610px

>>37906021
Hahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahaha

>>37906021
That graph is false. Next?

>>37906059
The absolute denial

File: Have_they_not_yet_learnt.png (162KB, 1700x782px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1700x782px

>>37906039
Yeah, although I don't really know how it would go if there was a (say) 5'8" manlet with a 10/10 face Vs. a 6'1" man with a 5/5 face. I'm guessing the 6'1" guy still has an advantage.
>>37906059
https://theblog.okcupid.com/the-big-lies-people-tell-in-online-dating-a9e3990d6ae2

>>37906021
A 5"8 guy isn't drastically different than a 6" guy though
Also the best male is literally messaged less than the worst female

>>37906021
There's an undeniable trend that taller men are much more likely to be virgins than shorter men.

>>37906087
You're a fucking retard if you think a 5'8" with model tier looks won't be swimming in pussy. He'll be fucking the gf of the 6'1" guy.

File: wow.gif (402KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 250x250px

>>37905947
>height isn't everything
really activates the neurons to stimulate cognitive sentience

Pretty realistic comic. Let's see the bitter virgin lanklets come out and deny it.

>>37906121
Post a graph or else I laugh

File: IMG_2278.png (168KB, 748x756px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 748x756px

>>37906101
>>37906121
>>37906134
>manlets posting as if they are even human or considered by women
Not even once

LMAOOOOOO

File: Taylor_manlet.jpg (435KB, 1336x1764px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 1336x1764px

>>37906121
Source. Also >>37906087 disagrees.
>>37906134
I'm not so sure senpai.

>>37906181
How's the weather up there, bitter virgin lanklet?

I'm 5'8 and I've never had a girl tell me I'm too short.

My wife of 4 years is 5'9, maybe you guys should just stop being pessimistic faggots all the time.

>>37906192
I'm sure he is devastated by two ugly roasties thinking that and cries himself to sleep in his harem of girls worshipping him.

>>37906201
I'm 5'6" and have fucked girls of all heights. Dated a 5'11" girl once.

>>37906194
>taller than you
>bitter
I'm enjoying myself since I can actually go on rides at the amusement park with my girlfriend.

>>37906192
Yeah I'm sure he felt so bad fucking them in the bathroom while Taylor Swift was sending him nudes.

>>37906021
By this graph a 5 foot 4 guy is likely to get an unsolicited message every 2 and a half weeks, and a 6 foot 1 guy is getting one once a week. It really doesn't seem that different, also the difference between 5 10 and 6 3 is barely anything in this graph. I think it just shows that less than 5 10 is the shit range, and 6 1 is the ideal height, which everyone knew anyway.

>>37906087
so both are 10/10 faces? check your numbers fool

File: manlets.jpg (286KB, 749x554px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 749x554px

>>37906206
>ugly
Virgin standards are something else. Also pic related.
>Interestingly, females did rate a photographed male as more attractive when he was depicted as tall than when he was depicted as short relative to an adjacent female.

lmao!

>>37906222
... if you had one. But as long as you never talk to girls you will not get one.

>>37906262
An average looking guy will look more attractive if he has a witty profile writeup.

File: manlets2.jpg (370KB, 778x604px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 778x604px

>>37906257
The science is in. It's looking conclusive.

File: 1496166662575.gif (967KB, 245x250px) Image search: [Google]

967KB, 245x250px

>5'9
>both group pictures on my tinder account are next to my mega manlet friends so I look tall

>>37906324
Go back to le /pol/ fagggot

>>37906302
What? my point is that you said 10/10 and 5/5 as if they are different. They both mean 1 really, so they're both the same as 10/10. you meant to say a 10/10 and a 5/10.

File: 1467827056153.jpg (63KB, 445x372px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 445x372px

>it's another "height is everything" vs "height is meaningless" episode

File: manlets3.jpg (143KB, 746x176px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 746x176px

>>37906340
Oh yeah, my bad.

>>37906357
There isn't much variety in them. It's always the same 2 or 3 graphs being posted with "lel manlet".

>>37906302
Nice "science" there, illiterate faggot.

>Tfw 6ft tall virgin
>see a lot of head lower than me dudes walking with cute girls
>they are not even handsome or ripe
>Only thing different is they have clean face and probably a job
Im slav tho so things may be different here

>>37906466
Your girls are materialistic whores, but so are all other girls too.