What's wrong with liking Chad?

>>37901879
It depends on the strength of their character, or if they even know what that is.

File: IMG_5491.jpg (40KB, 318x319px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 318x319px

>>37901879
Noting he's objectively superior

Nothing. They are superior in every way.
Same with rich people.
The idea that we're all somehow equal and have a positive trait to compensate for every flaw is nonsense.

>>37901925
I think "equal" is closer to "we all deserve the same basic human rights" and has less to do with our individual and personal characteristics. The rich person isn't "better" than the poor or middle class person because if you were "better" you could be rude and stuff with no consequences.

>>37901961
It's a very polysemic word, and they are better: better genes, better education, better infancy, better social influences, etc, etc. Not in the sense that we live in a chaste system (which we obviously don't).

>>37901879
Chances are he bullied one of us in the past.